0
Research Papers

Effective Convergence Checks for Verifying Finite Element Stresses at Two-Dimensional Stress Concentrations

[+] Author and Article Information
G. B. Sinclair

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Louisiana State University,
Baton Rouge, LA 70803

J. R. Beisheim

Development Department,
ANSYS Inc.,
Canonsburg, PA 15317

P. J. Roache

Consultant,
1215 Apache Drive,
Socorro, NM 87801

Manuscript received April 26, 2016; final manuscript received October 12, 2016; published online December 2, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Jeffrey E. Bischoff.

J. Verif. Valid. Uncert 1(4), 041003 (Dec 02, 2016) (8 pages) Paper No: VVUQ-16-1012; doi: 10.1115/1.4034977 History: Received April 26, 2016; Revised October 12, 2016

The accurate determination of stresses at two-dimensional (2D) stress risers is both an important and a challenging problem in engineering. Finite element analysis (FEA) has become the method of choice in making such determinations when new configurations with unknown stress concentrations are encountered in practice. For such FEA to be useful, discretization errors in peak stresses have to be sufficiently controlled. Convergence checks and companion error estimates offer a means of exerting such control. Here, we report some new convergence checks to this end. These checks are designed to promote conservative error estimation. They are applied to seven benchmark problems that have exact solutions for their peak stresses. Associated stress concentration factors span a range that is larger than that normally experienced in engineering. Error levels in the FEA of these peak stresses are classified in accordance with: 1–5%, satisfactory; 1/5–1%, good; and <1/5%, excellent. The present convergence checks result in 91 error assessments for the benchmark problems. For these 91, errors are assessed as being at the same level as true exact errors on 83 occasions and one level worse for the other 8. Thus, stress error estimation is largely accurate (91%) and otherwise modestly conservative (9%).

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Pilkey, W. D. , and Pilkey, D. F. , 2008, Peterson's Stress Concentration Factors, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Sinclair, G. B. , Cormier, N. G. , Griffin, J. H. , and Meda, G. , 2002, “ Contact Stresses in Dovetail Attachments: Finite Element Modeling,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 124(1), pp. 182–189. [CrossRef]
Cormier, N. G. , Smallwood, B. S. , Sinclair, G. B. , and Meda, G. , 1999, “ Aggressive Submodelling of Stress Concentrations,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 46(6), pp. 889–909. [CrossRef]
Richardson, L. F. , 1910, “ The Approximate Arithmetical Solution by Finite Differences of Physical Problems Involving Differential Equations, With an Application to the Stresses in a Masonry Dam,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 210, pp. 307–357. [CrossRef]
Richardson, L. F. , 1927, “ The Deferred Approach to the Limit—Part I: Single Lattice,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 226(636–646), pp. 299–349. [CrossRef]
De Vahl Davis, G. , 1983, “ Natural Convection of Air in a Square Cavity: A Bench Mark Numerical Solution,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 3(3), pp. 249–264. [CrossRef]
Roache, P. J. , 1994, “ Perspective: A Method for Uniform Reporting of Grid Refinement Studies,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 116(3), pp. 405–413. [CrossRef]
Roache, P. J. , 1998, “ Verification of Codes and Calculations,” AIAA J., 36(5), pp. 696–702. [CrossRef]
Roache, P. J. , 2009, Fundamentals of Verification and Validation, Hermosa Publishing, Socorro, NM.
ASME, 2006, “ Guide for Verification and Validation in Computational Solid Mechanics,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, Standard No. ASME V&V10.
ASME, 2012, “ An Illustration of the Concepts of Verification and Validation in Computational Solid Mechanics,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, Standard No. ASME V&V 10.1.
Neuber, H. , 1946, Theory of Notch Stresses, J. W. Edwards, Ann Arbor, MI.
ANSYS, 2016, “ ANSYS Modeling and Meshing Guide, Rev. 16.0,” ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA.
Cook, R. D. , Malkus, D. S. , Plesha, M. E. , and Witt, R. J. , 2002, Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis, Wiley, New York, NY.
Shtaerman, I. Ya. , 1949, Contact Problems of the Theory of Elasticity, Gostekhizdat, Moscow, Russia.
Johnson, K. L. , 1985, Contact Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Sinclair, G. B. , 2013, “ Edge-of-Contact Stresses in Blade Attachments in Gas Turbines,” Surface Effects and Contact Mechanics, Vol. XI, Siena, Italy, WIT Press, Wessex, UK, pp. 87–108.
ANSYS, 2016, “ ANSYS Element Reference Guide, Rev. 16.0,” ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA.
Sinclair, G. B. , Beisheim, J. R. , and Sezer, S. , 2006, “ Practical Convergence-Divergence Checks for Stresses from FEA,” International ANSYS Users' Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, May 2–4.
Kolosov, G. V. , 1914, “ On Some Properties of the Plane Problem of Elasticity Theory,” Z. Math. Phys., 62, pp. 383–409.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Dovetail attachment in a gas turbine: (a) cross section of the attachment, (b) initial finite element mesh, and (c) contact stresses for refined meshes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Geometry and coordinates for notch benchmark problems: initial mesh

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In