Update search
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper No
NARROW
Date
Availability
1-1 of 1
Curbs (Roads)
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Proceedings Papers
Proc. ASME. FMD2013, ASME 2013 Conference on Frontiers in Medical Devices: Applications of Computer Modeling and Simulation, V001T10A007, September 11–13, 2013
Paper No: FMD2013-16034
Abstract
Prolonged mechanical loading of tissue in between a bony prominence and a support surface can lead to pressure ulcers. Despite recent initiatives to curb down incidence rates, the health care burden of pressure ulcer prevention remains significant [1]. Etiology of pressure ulcers are commonly attributed to interface pressures. As a result, interventions, e.g., support surfaces, routinely aim to reduce contact pressures. However, the clinical effectiveness of such an objective can be questionable [2]. Recent studies have shown that internal mechanics of the tissue can be associated with pressure ulcer development [3], potentially indicating the inefficacy of interventions targeted solely at contact pressure relief. Tissue characteristics at a bony prominence, e.g., tissue thickness and material properties, also influence load distribution within and on the surface of the tissue. Given the variability in patient populations and for a bony region of interest [4], it is possible that patient specific risk and load relief (with the use of support surface) may differ widely.