Bulk metallic glasses are excellent candidate materials for integral armor because of their high strength and large elastic strain. Also, annealed glasses exhibit higher yield strengths than their fully amorphous counterparts. Therefore, the dynamic behavior of an annealed bulk metallic glass, Zr41.25Ti13.75Ni10Cu12.5Be22.5, was investigated in this study. A Split-Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) was employed to determine the stress-strain response at strain rates varying from 500/s-2000/s for the annealed glass. Also, a high-speed camera was utilized to obtain in-situ video of the specimen during the deformation process. These results were then compared to similar tests on the fully amorphous material. Finally, a new specimen design and experimental setup was proposed to promote accurate measurements from SHPB tests. During dynamic loading, the strain to failure increased as the strain-rate was increased, and the changes in strain-rate produced a larger effect than that of the annealing treatment on the failure strain. Maximum stresses were generally higher for the annealed glass, although there was some scatter. Finally, while an instability formed a dominant shear band for the as-received material, extensive fragmentation characterized the deformation after formation of an initial crack.

1.
Lowhaphandu
P.
, and
Lewandowski
J. J.
(
2001
). “
Fracture Toughness and Notched toughness of Bulk Amorphous Alloy Zr-Ti-Ni-Cu-Be
,”
Scripta Materialia
38
(
12
),
1811
1817
.
2.
Bruck, H.A. (1994). “Quasi-static and Dynamic Constitutive Characterization of Beryllium-bearing Bulk Metallic Glasses,” Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology.
3.
Peker
A.
, and
Johnson
W.
(
1993
). “
A Highly Processable Metallic Glass: Zr41.25Ti13.75Cu12.5Ni10Be22.5
,”
Applied Physics Letters
63
(
17
),
2342
2344
.
4.
Lu., J. (2002). “Mechanical Behavior of a Bulk Metallic Glass and its Composite over a Wide Range of Strain Rates and Temperatures,” Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology.
5.
Hufnagel
T. C.
,
Jiao
T.
,
Li
Y.
,
Xing
L. Q.
, and
Ramesh
K. T.
(
2002
) “
Deformation and failure of Zr57Ti5Cu20Ni8Al10 bulk metallic glass under quasi-static and dynamic compression
.”
Journal of Material Research
17
,
1441
1445
.
6.
Subhash, G., Zhang, H., and Li, H. (2003). “Thermodynamic and Mechanical Behavior of Hafhium/Zirconium Based Bulk Metallic Glasses.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Mechanical Behavior of Materials (ICM-9), Geneva, Switzerland, May 25–29, 2003.
7.
Sunny, G., Yuan, F., Prakash, V., and Lewandowski, J. (2005) “Effects of Specimen Geometry on High Strain-Rate Behavior of a Bulk Metallic Glass.” Proceedings of the Society of Experimental Mechanics, Portland, Oregon, June 7–9, 2005.
8.
Lewandowski
J. J.
(
2001
) “
Effects of Annealing and Changes in Stress State on Fracture Toughness of Bulk Metallic Glass
.”
Materials Transactions
42
(
4
),
633
637
.
9.
Lewandowski
J. J.
and
Lowhaphandu
P.
. (
2002
). “
Effects of Hydrostatic Pressure on Flow and Fracture of a Bulk Amorphous Metal
,”
Philosophical Magazine A
,
82
(
17/18
),
3427
3441
.
10.
Gray, G.T. (1996). “Classic Split-Hopkinson Bar Testing.” Mechanical Testing and Evaluation Handbook, Vol. 8, American Society for Metals, Materials Park, OH, 462–476.
11.
Subhash, G., and Ravichandran, G. (1996) “Split-Hopkinson Bar Testing of Ceramics.” Mechanical Testing and Evaluation Handbook, Vol. 8, American Society for Metals, Materials Park, OH, 497–504.
12.
Chen
W.
,
Subhash
G.
, and
Ravichandran
G.
(
1994
) “
Evaluation of Ceramic Specimen Geometries Used in a Split-Hopkinson Pressure Bar
.”
DYMAT Journal
1
,
193
210
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.