Passenger airbag is an important vehicle passive safety device to protect occupant safety. The shape of a passenger airbag plays an important role in determining how well the device is capable of protecting occupants. Traditionally, the airbag shape is designed manually, using a trial and error method. The lines of a passenger airbag shape are first drawn. After meshing the airbag, it is inserted into multiple occupant restraint system models. Then, run the multiple occupant models for different crash scenario and evaluate the occupant injury numbers. The process is iterated until a design meets all occupant injury criteria. The manual process is not only time-consuming, but also has little chance to find the optimal solutions if any. This paper first automates the whole design process using an advanced integration tool. Advanced optimization method is then used to find the optimal airbag shape systematically. A real-world frontal impact application with different dummies, belted and/or unbelted, at different impact speeds is used to demonstrate the methodology.

Volume Subject Area:
Health and Safety
Topics:
Airbags, Design, Optimization, Shapes, Safety, Wounds, Errors, Restraint systems, Vehicles
1.
Fu
Y.
,
Yang
R. J.
, and
Yeh
I.
, “
A Genetic Algorithm for Optimal Design of an Inflatable Knee Bolster
,”
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
, Vol.
26
, pp.
264
–
271
,
2004
.
2.
Honglu Zhang, Madana M. Gopal and Roopesh Saxena, Xavier J. Avula, “An Integrated Optimization System for Airbag Design and Modeling by Finite Element Analysis,” 2003-01-0506, 2003 SAE World Congress, Detroit, Michigan, March 3–6, 2003.
3.
MADYMO User’s Manual, Version 5.4.1, TNO, 1999.
4.
Seongjin Kim, Soongu Hong and Jeongkeun Lee, “A Study of Driver Airbag Shape Design with Process Integration,” 2005-01-1299, 2005 SAE World Congress, Detroit, Michigan, April 11–14, 2005.
5.
Sey Bok Lee and Soon Gu Hong, “Parametric Study on Mid-Mounted Passenger Airbag Cushion Using Design of Experiments,” 2003-01-0514, 2003 SAE World Congress, Detroit, Michigan, March 3–6, 2003.
6.
HYPERMESH User’s Manual, Version 6.0, Altair Computing Inc, 2005.
7.
John E. Hinger and Harold E. Clyde, “Advanced Air Bag Systems and Occupant Protection: Recent Modifications to FMVSS 208,” 2001-01-0157, 2001 SAE World Congress, Detroit, Michigan, March 5–8, 2001.
8.
modeFRONTIER User’s Manual, Version 3.1.0, ESTECO, 2005.
9.
Zeleny, M., Linear Multiobjective Programming, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 95, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1974.
10.
Cohon, J. L., Multiobjective Programming and Planning, Academic Press, Inc., New York, 1978.
11.
Steuer, R. E., Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation, and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1986.
12.
Miettinen, K. M., Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts, 1999.
13.
Mei
T. X.
, and
Goodall
R. M.
, “
Use of Multiobjective Genetic Algorithms to Optimize Inter-Vehicle Active Suspensions
,”
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
, Vol.
216
, No.
1
,
2002
, pp.
53
–
63
.
14.
Sankar
S. S
,
Ponnanbalam
S. G.
,
Rajendran
C.
, “
A Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm for Scheduling a Flexible Manufacturing System
,”
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
, Vol.
22
, No.
3–4
,
2003
, pp.
229
–
236
.
15.
Hanne
T.
, “
Global Multiobjective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
,”
Journal of Heuristics
, Vol.
6
, No.
3
,
2000
, pp.
347
–
360
.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 2005
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.