We present a geometric representation of the set of three-dimensional rigid-body collisional impulses that are reasonably permissible by the combination of non-negative post-collision separation rate, non-negative collisional compression impulse, non-negative energy dissipation and the Coulomb friction inequality. The construction is presented for a variety of special collisional situations involving special symmetry or extremes in the mass distribution, the friction coefficient, or the initial conditions. We review a variety of known friction laws and show how they do and do not fit in the permissible region in impulse space as well as comment on other attributes of these laws. We present a few parameterizations of the full permissible region of impulse space. We present a simple generalization to arbitrary three-dimensional point contact collisions of a simple law previously only applicable to objects with contact-inertia eigenvectors aligned with the surface normal and initial relative tangential velocity component (e.g., spheres and disks). This new algebraic collision law has two restitution parameters for general three-dimensional frictional single-point rigid-body collisions. The new law generates a collisional impulse that is a weighted sum of the impulses from a frictionless but nonrebounding collision and from a perfectly sticking, nonrebounding collision. We describe useful properties of our law; show geometrically the set of impulses it can predict for several collisional situations; and compare it with existing laws. For simultaneous collisions we propose that the new algebraic law be used by recursively breaking these collisions into a sequence ordered by the normal approach velocities of potential contact pairs.

1.
Anitescu
M.
, and
Potra
F. A.
,
1997
, “
Formulating dynamic multi-rigid-body contact problems with friction as solvable linear complementarity problems
,”
Nonlinear Dynamics
, Vol.
14
, pp.
231
247
.
2.
Baraff
D.
,
1989
, “
Analytical methods for dynamic simulation of non-penetrating rigid bodies
,”
Computer Graphics
, Vol.
23
, No.
3
, pp.
223
232
.
3.
Batlle
J. A.
, and
Cardona
S.
,
1998
, “
The Jamb (Self-Locking) Process in Three-Dimensional Rough Collisions
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS
, Vol.
65
, pp.
417
423
.
4.
Bhatt
V.
, and
Koechling
J.
,
1995
a, “
Partitioning the Parameter Space According to Different Behaviors During Three-Dimensional Impacts
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS
, Vol.
62
, pp.
740
746
.
5.
Bhatt
V.
, and
Koechling
J.
,
1995
b, “
Three-Dimensional Frictional Rigid-Body Impact
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS
, Vol.
62
, pp.
893
898
.
6.
Brach, R. M., 1991, Mechanical Impact Dynamics: Rigid Body Collisions, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
7.
Brogliato, B., 1996, Nonsmooth Impact Mechanics: Models, Dynamics and Control, Springer, London, UK.
8.
Chatterjee, A., 1997, “Rigid Body Collisions: Some General Considerations, New Collision Laws, and Some Experimental Data,” Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
9.
Chatterjee, A., 1998, “Note on the realism of complementarity conditions in rigid body collisions,” manuscript in preparation.
10.
Chatterjee, A., and Ruina, A., 1997, “Some new algebraic rigid body collision laws,” Applied Mechanics in the Americas, Vol. 4, Proceedings of the Fifth Pan American Congress of Applied Mechanics, San Juan, Puerto Rico, pp. 403–406.
11.
Chatterjee
A.
, and
Ruina
A.
,
1998
a, “
Two Interpretations of Rigidity in Rigid-Body Collisions
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS
, Vol.
65
, pp.
894
900
.
12.
Chatterjee, A., and Ruina, A., 1998b, “Realizability of Arbitrary Local Mass Matrices in Single-Point Rigid Body Collisions,” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Impact and Friction of Solids, Structures and Intelligent Machines, Ottawa, Canada, June, to appear.
13.
Cottle, R. W., Pang, J.-S.; and Stone, R. E., 1992, The Linear Complementarity Problem, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
14.
Garwin
R. L.
,
1969
, “
Kinematics of an ultraelastic rough ball
,”
American Journal of Physics
, Vol.
37
, No.
1
, pp.
88
92
.
15.
Goldsmith, W., 1960, Impact: The theory and physical behavior of colliding solids, Edward Arnold, Ltd., London, UK.
16.
Goyal
S.
,
Papadopoulos
J. M.
, and
Sullivan
P. A.
,
1998
a, “
The Dynamics of Clattering, I: Equations of Motion and Examples
,”
ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control
, Vol.
120
, pp.
83
93
.
17.
Goyal
S.
,
Papadopoulos
J. M.
, and
Sullivan
P. A.
,
1998
b, “
The Dynamics of Clattering, II: Global Results and Shock Protection
,”
ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control
, Vol.
120
, pp.
94
102
.
18.
Goyal
S.
,
Pinson
E. N.
, and
Sinden
F. W.
,
1994
, “
Simulation of dynamics of interacting rigid bodies including friction I: General problem and contact model
,”
Engineering with Computers
, Vol.
10
, pp.
162
174
.
19.
Ivanov
A. P.
,
1992
, “
Energetics of a collision with friction
,”
Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics
, Vol.
56
, No.
4
, pp.
527
534
.
20.
Ivanov
A. P.
,
1995
, “
On multiple impact
,”
Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics
, Vol.
59
, No.
6
, pp.
887
902
.
21.
Jenkins
J. T.
,
1992
, “
Boundary Conditions for Rapid Granular Flow: Flat, Frictional Walls
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS
, Vol.
59
, pp.
120
127
.
22.
Johnson
K. L.
,
1983
, “
The bounce of ‘superball,’
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education
, Vol.
11
, No.
1
, pp.
57
63
.
23.
Kane, T. R., and Levinson, D. A., 1985, Dynamics: Theory and Applications, McGraw-Hill, New York.
24.
Lo¨tstedt
P.
,
1982
, “
Mechanical systems of rigid bodies subject to unilateral constraints
,”
SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics
, Vol.
42
, No.
2
, pp.
281
296
.
25.
Maw
N.
,
Barber
J. R.
, and
Fawcett
J. N.
,
1981
, “
The Role of Elastic Tangential Compliance in Oblique Impact
,”
ASME Journal of Lubrication Technology
, Vol.
103
, pp.
74
80
.
26.
Moreau, J. J., 1983, “Standard inelastic shocks and the dynamics of unilateral constraints,” Unilateral problems in structural analysis (International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, Courses and Lectures, No. 288), G. D. Piero and F. Maceri, eds., Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 173–221.
27.
Pfeiffer, F., and Clocker, C., 1996, Dynamics of rigid body systems with unilateral constraints (Wiley Series in Nonlinear Science), A. H. Nayfeh and A. V. Holden, series eds., John Wiley and Sons, New York.
28.
Poisson, S. D., 1833, Traite´ de Me´canique, 2nd Ed., Bachelier, Paris.
29.
Routh, E. J., 1897, Dynamics of a System of Rigid Bodies, 6th Ed., Macmillan and Co., London.
30.
Rubin
M. B.
,
1998
, “
Physical Restrictions on the Impulse Acting During Three-Dimensional Impact of Two “Rigid” Bodies
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS
, Vol.
65
, pp.
464
469
.
31.
Smith
C. E.
,
1991
, “
Predicting Rebounds Using Rigid-Body Dynamics
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS
, Vol.
58
, pp.
754
758
.
32.
Smith
C. E.
, and
Liu
P.-P.
,
1992
, “
Coefficients of Restitution
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS
, Vol.
59
, pp.
963
969
.
33.
Stoianovici
D.
, and
Hurmuzlu
Y.
,
1996
, “
A Critical Study of the Applicability of Rigid-Body Collision Theory
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS
, Vol.
63
, pp.
307
316
.
34.
Stronge
W. J.
,
1994
, “
Swerve During Three-Dimensional Impact of Rough Bodies
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS
, Vol.
61
, pp.
605
611
.
35.
Walton, O., 1992, Particulate Two-Phase Flow, M. C. Roco, ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, Chapter 25.
36.
Wang
Y.
, and
Mason
M. T.
,
1992
, “
Two-Dimensional Rigid-Body Collisions With Friction
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS
, Vol.
59
, pp.
635
642
.
37.
Whittaker, E. T., 1944, A Treatise on the Analytical Dynamics of Particles and Rigid Bodies, 4th Ed., Dover, New York.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.