The transverse compression and shear collapse mechanisms of a second order, hierarchical corrugated truss structure have been analyzed. The two competing collapse modes of a first order corrugated truss are elastic buckling or plastic yielding of the truss members. In second order trusses, elastic buckling and yielding of the larger and smaller struts, shear buckling of the larger struts, and wrinkling of the face sheets of the larger struts have been identified as the six competing modes of failure. Analytical expressions for the compressive and shear collapse strengths in each of these modes are derived and used to construct collapse mechanism maps for second order trusses. The maps are useful for selecting the geometries of second order trusses that maximize the collapse strength for a given mass. The optimization reveals that second order trusses made from structural alloys have significantly higher compressive and shear collapse strengths than their equivalent mass first order counterparts for relative densities less than about 5%. A simple sheet metal folding and dip brazing method of fabrication has been used to manufacture a prototype second order truss with a relative density of about 2%. The experimental investigation confirmed the analytical strength predictions of the second order truss, and demonstrate that its strength is about ten times greater than that of a first order truss of the same relative density.

1.
Hashin
,
Z.
, and
Shtrikman
,
S.
, 1963, “
A Variational Approach to the Theory of the Elastic Behavior of Multi-Phase Materials
,”
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
0022-5096,
11
, p.
127
.
2.
Norris
,
A. N.
, 1985, “
A Differential Scheme for the Effective Moduli of Composites
,”
Mech. Mater.
0167-6636,
4
, p.
1
.
3.
Milton
,
G. W.
, 1986, “
Modeling the Properties of Composites by Laminates
,” in
Homogenization and Effective Moduli of Materials and Media
,
J. L.
Ericksen
,
D.
Kinderlehrer
,
R.
Kohn
, and
J.-L.
Lions
, eds.,
Springer
, New York, p.
150
.
4.
Francfort
,
G.
, and
Murat
,
F.
, 1986, “
Homogenization and Optimal Bounds in Linear Elasticity
,”
Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.
0003-9527,
94
, p.
307
.
5.
Bhat
,
T.
,
Wang
,
T. G.
, and
Gibson
,
L. J.
, 1989, “
Micro-Sandwich Honeycomb
,”
SAMPE J.
0091-1062,
25
(
3
), p.
43
.
6.
Lakes
,
R.
, 1993, “
Materials With Structural Hierarchy
,”
Nature (London)
0028-0836,
361
(
11
), p.
511
.
7.
Murphey
,
T.
, and
Hinkle
,
J.
, 2003, “
Some Performance Trends in Hierarchical Truss Structures
,”
44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Conference
,
Norfolk, VA
, Apr. 7–10, 1903.
8.
Deshpande
,
V. S.
, and
Fleck
,
N. A.
, 2001, “
Collapse of Truss-Core Sandwich Beams in 3-Point Bending
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
0020-7683,
38
, p.
6275
.
9.
Zenkert
,
D.
, 1995,
An Introduction to Sandwich Construction
,
Engineering Materials Advisory Service
,
Sheffield, UK
, pp.
30
60
.
10.
Hutchinson
,
J. W.
, 1974, “
Plastic Buckling
,” in
Advances in Applied Mechanics
,
C.-S.
Yih
, ed.,
Academic
, New York, vol.
14
, p.
67
.
11.
Cote
,
F.
,
Deshpande
,
V. S.
,
Fleck
,
N. A.
, and
Evans
,
A. G.
, 2004, “
The Out-of-Plane Compressive Behavior of Metallic Honeycombs
,
Mater. Sci. Eng., A
0921-5093,
380
, p.
272
.
12.
Cote
,
F.
,
Deshpande
,
V. S.
,
Fleck
,
N. A.
, and
Evans
,
A. G.
, 2006, “
The Compressive and Shear Responses of Corrugated and Diamond Lattice Materials
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
0020-7683,
43
, pp.
6220
6242
.
13.
Wadley
,
H. N. G.
,
Fleck
,
N. A.
, and
Evans
,
A. G.
, 2003, “
Fabrication and Structural Performance of Periodic Cellular Metal Sandwich Structures
,”
Compos. Sci. Technol.
0266-3538,
63
, p.
2331
.
You do not currently have access to this content.