The transverse compression and shear collapse mechanisms of a second order, hierarchical corrugated truss structure have been analyzed. The two competing collapse modes of a first order corrugated truss are elastic buckling or plastic yielding of the truss members. In second order trusses, elastic buckling and yielding of the larger and smaller struts, shear buckling of the larger struts, and wrinkling of the face sheets of the larger struts have been identified as the six competing modes of failure. Analytical expressions for the compressive and shear collapse strengths in each of these modes are derived and used to construct collapse mechanism maps for second order trusses. The maps are useful for selecting the geometries of second order trusses that maximize the collapse strength for a given mass. The optimization reveals that second order trusses made from structural alloys have significantly higher compressive and shear collapse strengths than their equivalent mass first order counterparts for relative densities less than about 5%. A simple sheet metal folding and dip brazing method of fabrication has been used to manufacture a prototype second order truss with a relative density of about 2%. The experimental investigation confirmed the analytical strength predictions of the second order truss, and demonstrate that its strength is about ten times greater than that of a first order truss of the same relative density.
Skip Nav Destination
e-mail: gkooistra@watsonfurniture.com
Article navigation
March 2007
Technical Papers
Hierarchical Corrugated Core Sandwich Panel Concepts
Gregory W. Kooistra,
Gregory W. Kooistra
Department of Materials Science and Engineering,
e-mail: gkooistra@watsonfurniture.com
University of Virginia
, 116 Engineer's Way, Charlottesville, VA 22904
Search for other works by this author on:
Vikram Deshpande,
Vikram Deshpande
Engineering Department,
Cambridge University
, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Haydn N. G. Wadley
Haydn N. G. Wadley
Department of Materials Science and Engineering,
University of Virginia
, 116 Engineer's Way, Charlottesville, VA 22904
Search for other works by this author on:
Gregory W. Kooistra
Department of Materials Science and Engineering,
University of Virginia
, 116 Engineer's Way, Charlottesville, VA 22904e-mail: gkooistra@watsonfurniture.com
Vikram Deshpande
Engineering Department,
Cambridge University
, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK
Haydn N. G. Wadley
Department of Materials Science and Engineering,
University of Virginia
, 116 Engineer's Way, Charlottesville, VA 22904J. Appl. Mech. Mar 2007, 74(2): 259-268 (10 pages)
Published Online: September 20, 2005
Article history
Received:
May 12, 2005
Revised:
September 20, 2005
Citation
Kooistra, G. W., Deshpande, V., and Wadley, H. N. G. (September 20, 2005). "Hierarchical Corrugated Core Sandwich Panel Concepts." ASME. J. Appl. Mech. March 2007; 74(2): 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2198243
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
The Through-Thickness Compressive Strength of a Composite Sandwich Panel With a Hierarchical Square Honeycomb Sandwich Core
J. Appl. Mech (November,2009)
Buckling of Long Sandwich Cylindrical Shells Under External Pressure
J. Appl. Mech (July,2005)
Wrinkling of Wide Sandwich Panels∕Beams With Orthotropic Phases by an Elasticity Approach
J. Appl. Mech (November,2005)
Which Formulation Allows Using a Constant Shear Modulus for
Small-Strain Buckling of Soft-Core Sandwich Structures?
J. Appl. Mech (September,2005)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Estimating Resilient Modulus Using Neural Network Models
Intelligent Engineering Systems Through Artificial Neural Networks, Volume 17
Subsection NB—Class 1 Components
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 1, Third Edition
Section VIII: Division 2–Alternative Rules
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes, Volume 2, Sixth Edition