The hydroelastic scaling relations for the shock response of water-backed, anisotropic composite marine structures are derived and verified. The scaling analysis considers the known underwater explosion physics, previously derived analytical solutions for the underwater shock response of a water-backed plate, and elastic beam behavior. To verify the scaling relations, the hydroelastic underwater shock response of an anisotropic composite plate at several different scales is modeled as a fully coupled fluid-structure interaction (FSI) problem using the commercial Lagrangian finite element software ABAQUS/Explicit. Following geometric and Mach similitude, as well as proper scaling of the FSI parameter, scaling relations for the structural natural frequencies, fluid and structural responses are demonstrated for a variety of structural boundary conditions (cantilevered, fixed-fixed, and pinned-pinned). The scaling analysis shows that the initial response scales properly for elastic marine structures, but the secondary bubble pulse reload caused by an underwater explosion does not follow the same scaling and may result in resonant response at full scale.

References

1.
Fatt
,
M. S. H.
and
Palla
,
L
., 2009. “
Analytical Modeling of Composite Sandwich Panels Under Blast Loads
,”
Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials
,
11
, pp.
357
380
.
2.
Young
,
Y
., 2009, “
Dynamic Hydroelastic Scaling of Self-Adaptive Composite Marine Rotors
,”
Composite Structures
,
7
(
1
), pp.
97
106
.
3.
Cole
,
R. H
., 1948,
Underwater Explosions
,
Dover
,
New York
.
4.
Hammond
,
L
. and
Saunders
,
D
., 1997, “
The Applicability of Scaling Laws to Underwater Shock Tests
,”
Maritime Platforms Division Aeronautical and Maritime Research Laboratory
, Tech. Report No. DSTO-GD-0162.
5.
Reid
,
W. D
., 1996, “
The Response of Surface Ships to Underwater Explosions
,”.
Ship Structures and Materials Division,
Aeronautical and Maritime Research Laboratory, Tech. Report No. DSTO-GD-0109.
6.
Geers
,
T. L
. and
Hunter
,
K. S
., 2002, “
An Integrated Wave-Effects Model for an Underwater Explosion Bubble
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
,
111
(
4
), pp.
1584
1601
.
7.
Shin
,
Y. S
., 2004, “
Ship Shock Modeling and Simulation for Far-Field Underwater Explosion
,”
Computers and Structures
,
82
, pp.
2211
2219
.
8.
Taylor
,
G. I
., 1963,
Scientific Papers of GI Taylor
, Vol.
III
, G. K. Batchelor, ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
p.
287
.
9.
Liu
,
Z
. and
Young
,
Y. L
., 2008, “
Transient Response of Submerged Plates Subject to Underwater Shock Loading: An Analytical Perspective
,”
J. Appl. Mech.
,
75
, pp.
044504
-
1
.
10.
Motley
,
M
.
,
Young
,
Y
., and
Liu
,
Z
., “
Three-Dimensional Underwater Shock Response of Adaptive Marine Structures
,”
J. Appl. Mech.
(submitted).
11.
ABAQUS, Inc., 2005. ABAQUS Version 6.6 Documentation, ABAQUS, Inc., Pawtucket, RI.
You do not currently have access to this content.