Stress analysis of the cement fixation of orthopaedic implants to bone is frequently carried out using finite element analysis. However, the stress distribution in the cement layer is usually intricate, and it is difficult to report it in a way that facilitates comparison of implants for pre-clinical testing. To study this problem, and make recommendations for stress reporting, a finite element analysis of a hip prosthesis implanted into a synthetic composite femur is developed. Three cases are analyzed: a fully bonded implant, a debonded implant, and a debonded implant where the cement is removed distal to the stem tip. In addition to peak stresses, and contour and vector plots, a stressed volume and probability-of-failure analysis is reported. It is predicted that the peak stress is highest for the debonded stem, and that removal of the distal cement more than halves this peak stress. This would suggest that omission of the distal cement is good for polished prostheses (as practiced for the Exeter design). However, if the percentage of cement stressed above a certain threshold (say 3 MPa) is considered, then the removal of distal cement is shown to be disadvantageous because a higher volume of cement is stressed to above the threshold. Vector plots clearly demonstrate the different load transfer for bonded and debonded prostheses: A bonded stem generates maximum tensile stresses in the longitudinal direction, whereas a debonded stem generates most tensile stresses in the hoop direction, except near the tip where tensile longitudinal stresses occur due to subsidence of the stem. Removal of the cement distal to the tip allows greater subsidence but alleviates these large stresses at the tip, albeit at the expense of increased hoop stresses throughout the mantle. It is concluded that a thorough analysis of cemented implants should not report peak stress, which can be misleading, but rather stressed volume, and that vector plots should be reported if a precise analysis of the load transfer mechanism is required.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
finite element analysis, stress analysis, prosthetics, orthopaedics, biomechanics
Topics:
Cements (Adhesives), Stress, Finite element analysis, Orthopedics, Failure, Probability
1.
Britton
,
A. R.
,
Murray
,
D. W.
,
Bulstrode
,
C. J.
,
McPhearson
,
K.
, and
Denham
,
R. A.
,
1997
, “
Pain Levels After Total Hip Replacement. Their Use as Endpoints for Survival Analysis
,”
J. Bone Jt. Surg.
,
79B
, pp.
93
–
98
.
2.
Malchau, H., and Herberts, P., 1998, “Prognosis of Total Hip Replacement. Revision and Re-revision Rate in THR. A Revision Risk Study of 148,359 Primary Operations,” scientific exhibition presented at the 65th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, New Orleans, LA.
3.
Huiskes
,
R.
, and
Boeklagen
,
R.
,
1989
, “
Mathematical Shape Optimization of Hip Prosthesis Design
,”
J. Biomech.
,
22
, pp.
793
–
804
.
4.
Lee, A. J. C., 1994, “Implants for Fixation With and Without a Collar,” in: Technical Principles, Design, and Safety of Joint Implants, G. H. Buchhorn and H.-G. Willert, eds., Hogrefe & Hubber, Bern, pp. 128–132.
5.
Harris
,
W. H.
,
1992
, “
Is It Advantageous to Strengthen the Cement Metal Interface and Use a Collar for Cemented Femoral Components of Total Hip Replacements
,”
Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.
,
285
, pp.
67
–
72
.
6.
Prendergast, P. J. “Bone Prostheses and Implants,” in: Bone Mechanics Handbook, (S. C. Cowin, ed.), Boca Raton, FL, Chap. 35.
7.
Huiskes
,
R.
,
1990
“
The Various Stress Patterns of Press-Fit, Ingrown, and Cemented Femoral Stems
,”
Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.
,
261
, pp.
27
–
38
.
8.
Harrigan
,
T. P.
,
Kareh
,
J. A.
,
O’Connor
,
D. O.
,
Burke
,
D. W.
, and
Harris
,
W. H.
,
1992
, “
A Finite Element Study of the Initiation of Failure of Fixation in Cemented Femoral Total Hip Components
,”
J. Orthop. Res.
,
10
, pp.
134
–
144
.
9.
McCormack
,
B. A. O.
, and
Prendergast
,
P. J.
,
1999
, “
Microdamage Accumulation in the Cement Layer of Hip Replacements Under Flexural Loading
,”
J. Biomech.
,
32
, pp.
467
–
475
.
10.
Stolk, J., Verdonschot, N., and Huiskes, R., 1999, “Management of Strain Fields Around Singular Points: Comparison of FE Simulations and Experiments,” in: Middleton, J., Jones, M. N., and Pande, G. N., eds., Proc. 4th International Symposium on Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Gordon and Breach, pp. 57–62.
11.
Verdonschot
,
N.
, and
Huiskes
,
R.
,
1996
, “
Mechanical Effects of Stem Cement Interface Characteristics in Total Hip Replacement
,”
Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.
,
329
, pp.
326
–
336
.
12.
Stolk, J., Verdonschot, N., and Huiskes, R., 1998, “Sensitivity of Failure Criteria of Cemented Total Hip Replacements to Finite Element Mesh Density,” in: 11th Conference of the European Society of Biomechanics, Journal of Biomechanics, 31, pp. 165.
13.
Verdonschot
,
N.
, and
Huiskes
,
R.
,
1997
, “
The Effects of Cement-Stem Debonding in THA on the Long-Term Failure Probability of Cement
,”
J. Biomech.
,
30
, pp.
795
–
802
.
14.
Viceconti, M., 1997, curve2_3.igs, from: The ISB Finite Element Repository, Istituti Rizzoli; http://www.cineca.it/hosted/LTM/back2net/ISB_mesh.
15.
Bergmann
,
G.
,
Graichen
,
F.
, and
Rohlmann
,
A.
,
1993
, “
Hip Joint Loading During Walking and Running, Measured in Two Patients
,”
J. Biomech.
,
26
, No.
8
, pp.
969
–
990
.
16.
Duda
,
G.
,
1998
, “
Influence of Muscle Forces on Femoral Strain Distribution
,”
J. Biomech.
,
31
, pp.
841
–
846
.
17.
Murphy
,
B. P.
, and
Prendergast
,
P. J.
,
2000
, “
On the Magnitude and Variability of the Fatigue Strength of Acrylic Bone Cement
,”
Int. J. Fatigue
,
22
, pp.
855
–
864
.
18.
Cristofolini
,
L.
,
Viceconti
,
M.
,
Capello
,
A.
, and
Toni
,
A.
,
1996
, “
Mechanical Validation of Whole Bone Composite Femur Models
,”
J. Biomech.
,
29
, pp.
525
–
535
.
19.
McNamara
,
B. P.
,
Cristofolini
,
L.
,
Toni
,
A.
, and
Taylor
,
D.
,
1997
, “
Relationship Between Bone-Prosthesis Bonding and Load Transfer in Total Hip Reconstruction
,”
J. Biomech.
,
30
, No.
6
, pp.
621
–
630
.
20.
Stolk, J., Verdonschot, N., Cristofolini, L., Firmati, L., Toni, A., and Huiskes, R., 2000, “Strains in Composite Hip Joint Reconstructions Obtained Through FEA and Experiments Correspond Closely,” Trans. 46th Annu. Meet.—Orthop. Res. Soc., p. 515.
21.
Vichnin
,
H. H.
, and
Batterman
,
S. C.
,
1986
, “
Stress Analysis and Failure Prediction in the Proximal Femur Before and After Total Hip Replacement
,”
ASME J. Biomech. Eng.
,
108
, pp.
33
–
41
.
22.
Bergmann, G., and Duda, G., 1998, “Development of the Loading Configuration: Report for Contract SMT4-CT96-2076 Preclinical Testing of Cemented Hip Replacement Implants: Pre-normative Research for a European Standard,” Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
23.
Chang
,
P. B.
,
Mann
,
K. A.
, and
Bartel
,
D. L.
,
1998
, “
Cemented Femoral Stem Performance—Effects of Proximal Bonding, Geometry, and Neck Length
,”
Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.
,
355
, pp.
57
–
69
.
24.
Prendergast
,
P. J.
,
1997
, “
Finite Element Models in Tissue Mechanics and Orthopaedic Implant Design
,”
Clin. Biomech.
,
12
, pp.
343
–
366
.
25.
Fagan
,
M. J.
, and
Lee
,
A. J. C.
,
1986
, “
Materials Selection in the Design of the Femoral Component of Cemented Total Hip Replacement
,”
Clin. Mater.
,
1
, pp.
151
–
167
.
Copyright © 2001
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.