Background: Interbody arthrodesis is employed in the lumbar spine to eliminate painful motion and achieve stability through bony fusion. Bone grafts, metal cages, composite spacers, and growth factors are available and can be placed through traditional open techniques or minimally invasively. Whether placed anteriorly, posteriorly, or laterally, insertion of these implants necessitates compromise of the anulus—an inherently destabilizing procedure. A new axial percutaneous approach to the lumbosacral spine has been described. Using this technique, vertical access to the lumbosacral spine is achieved percutaneously via the presacral space. An implant that can be placed across a motion segment without compromise to the anulus avoids surgical destabilization and may be advantageous for interbody arthrodesis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro biomechanical performance of the axial fixation rod, an anulus sparing, centrally placed interbody fusion implant for motion segment stabilization. Method of Approach: Twenty-four bovine lumbar motion segments were mechanically tested using an unconstrained flexibility protocol in sagittal and lateral bending, and torsion. Motion segments were also tested in axial compression. Each specimen was tested in an intact state, then drilled (simulating a transaxial approach to the lumbosacral spine), then with one of two axial fixation rods placed in the spine for stabilization. The range of motion, bending stiffness, and axial compressive stiffness were determined for each test condition. Results were compared to those previously reported for femoral ring allografts, bone dowels, BAK and BAK Proximity cages, Ray TFC, Brantigan ALIF and TLIF implants, the InFix Device, Danek TIBFD, single and double Harms cages, and Kaneda, Isola, and University plating systems. Results: While axial drilling of specimens had little effect on stiffness and range of motion, specimens implanted with the axial fixation rod exhibited significant increases in stiffness and decreases in range of motion relative to intact state. When compared to existing anterior, posterior, and interbody instrumentation, lateral and sagittal bending stiffness of the axial fixation rod exceeded that of all other interbody devices, while stiffness in extension and axial compression were comparable to plate and rod constructs. Torsional stiffness was comparable to other interbody constructs and slightly lower than plate and rod constructs. Conclusions: For stabilization of the motion segment, axial placement of implants offers potential benefits relative to traditional exposures. The preliminary biomechanical data from this study indicate that the axial fixation rod compares favorably to other devices and may be suitable to reduce pathologic motion at , thus promoting bony fusion.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
November 2005
Technical Papers
Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Lumbosacral Axial Fixation Device
Eric H. Ledet,
Eric H. Ledet
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Albany Medical College
, Albany, NY 12208 and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
, Troy, NY 12180
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael P. Tymeson,
Michael P. Tymeson
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Albany Medical College
, Albany, NY 12208
Search for other works by this author on:
Simon Salerno,
Simon Salerno
Division of Neurosurgery,
Albany Medical College
, Albany, NY 12208
Search for other works by this author on:
Allen L. Carl,
Allen L. Carl
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Albany Medical College
, Albany, NY 12208
Search for other works by this author on:
Andrew Cragg
Andrew Cragg
Department of Radiology,
University of Minnesota
, Minneapolis, MN 55424
Search for other works by this author on:
Eric H. Ledet
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Albany Medical College
, Albany, NY 12208 and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
, Troy, NY 12180
Michael P. Tymeson
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Albany Medical College
, Albany, NY 12208
Simon Salerno
Division of Neurosurgery,
Albany Medical College
, Albany, NY 12208
Allen L. Carl
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Albany Medical College
, Albany, NY 12208
Andrew Cragg
Department of Radiology,
University of Minnesota
, Minneapolis, MN 55424J Biomech Eng. Nov 2005, 127(6): 929-933 (5 pages)
Published Online: July 14, 2005
Article history
Received:
April 1, 2005
Revised:
July 14, 2005
Citation
Ledet, E. H., Tymeson, M. P., Salerno, S., Carl, A. L., and Cragg, A. (July 14, 2005). "Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Lumbosacral Axial Fixation Device." ASME. J Biomech Eng. November 2005; 127(6): 929–933. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2049334
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
Design of a Dynamic Stabilization Spine Implant
J. Med. Devices (June,2009)
Design of an Endoreactor for the Cultivation of a Joint-Like-Structure
J. Med. Devices (June,2009)
Design of an Osseointegrated Lower Limb Prosthetic Force Limiting Connection
J. Med. Devices (June,2011)
Linear and Torsional Mechanical Characteristics of Intact and Reconstructed Scapholunate Ligaments
J Biomech Eng (April,2009)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Basic Concepts
Design & Analysis of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Components in the Creep Range
Novel and Efficient Mathematical and Computational Methods for the Analysis and Architecting of Ultralight Cellular Materials and their Macrostructural Responses
Advances in Computers and Information in Engineering Research, Volume 2
Flexibility Analysis
Process Piping: The Complete Guide to ASME B31.3, Third Edition