Reported investigations of facet articulation in the human spine have often been conducted through the insertion of pressure sensitive film into the joint space, which requires incision of the facet capsule and may alter the characteristics of interaction between the facet surfaces. Load transmission through the facet has also been measured using strain gauges bonded to the articular processes. While this method allows for preservation of the facet capsule, it requires extensive instrumentation of the spine, as well as strain-gauge calibration, and is highly sensitive to placement and location of the strain gauges. The inherently invasive nature of these techniques makes it difficult to translate them into medical practice. A method has been developed to investigate facet articulation through the application of test kinematics to a specimen-specific rigid-body model of each vertebra within a lumbar spine segment. Rigid-body models of each vertebral body were developed from CT scans of each specimen. The distances between nearest-neighboring points on each facet surface were calculated for specific time frames of each specimen’s flexion/extension test. A metric describing the proportion of each facet surface within a distance (2 mm) from the neighboring surface, the contact area ratio (CAR), was calculated at each of these time frames. A statistically significant difference (p<0.037) was found in the CAR between the time frames corresponding to full flexion and full extension in every level of the lumbar spine (L1–L5) using the data obtained from the seven specimens evaluated in this study. The finding that the contact area of the facet is greater in extension than flexion corresponds to other findings in the literature, as well as the generally accepted role of the facets in extension. Thus, a biomechanical method with a sufficiently sensitive metric is presented as a means to evaluate differences in facet articulation between intact and treated or between healthy and pathologic spines.

1.
Kahmann
,
R. D.
,
Buttermann
,
G. R.
,
Lewis
,
J. L.
, and
Bradford
,
D. S.
, 1990, “
Facet Loads in the Canine Lumbar Spine Before and After Disc Alteration
,”
Spine
0362-2436,
15
(
9
), pp.
971
978
.
2.
Luo
,
Z. P.
,
Buttermann
,
G. R.
, and
Lewis
,
J. L.
, 1996, “
Determination of Spinal Facet Joint Loads From Extra Articular Strains–A Theoretical Validation
,”
J. Biomech.
0021-9290,
29
(
6
), pp.
785
790
.
3.
Cripton
,
P. A.
,
Sati
,
M.
,
Orr
,
T. E.
,
Bourquin
,
Y.
,
Dumas
,
G. A.
, and
Nolte
,
L. P.
, 2001, “
Animation of In Vitro Biomechanical Tests
,”
J. Biomech.
0021-9290,
34
(
8
), pp.
1091
1096
.
4.
Yang
,
K. H.
, and
King
,
A. I.
, 1984, “
Mechanism of Facet Load Transmission as a Hypothesis for Low-Back Pain
,”
Spine
0362-2436,
9
(
6
), pp.
557
565
.
5.
Zhu
,
Q. A.
,
Park
,
Y. B.
,
Sjovold
,
S. G.
,
Niosi
,
C. A.
,
Wilson
,
D. C.
,
Cripton
,
P. A.
, and
Oxland
,
T. R.
, 2008, “
Can Extra-Articular Strains Be Used to Measure Facet Contact Forces in the Lumbar Spine? An In-Vitro Biomechanical Study
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part H: J. Eng. Med.
0954-4119,
222
(
2
), pp.
171
184
.
6.
Ha
,
K. Y.
,
Schendel
,
M. J.
,
Lewis
,
J. L.
, and
Ogilvie
,
J. W.
, 1993, “
Effect of Immobilization and Configuration on Lumbar Adjacent-Segment Biomechanics
,”
J. Spinal Disord.
0895-0385,
6
(
2
), pp.
99
105
.
7.
Lorenz
,
M.
,
Patwardhan
,
A.
, and
Vanderby
,
R.
, Jr.
, 1983, “
Load-Bearing Characteristics of Lumbar Facets in Normal and Surgically Altered Spinal Segments
,”
Spine
0362-2436,
8
(
2
), pp.
122
130
.
8.
Rousseau
,
M. A.
,
Bradford
,
D. S.
,
Bertagnoli
,
R.
,
Hu
,
S. S.
, and
Lotz
,
J. C.
, 2006, “
Disc Arthroplasty Design Influences Intervertebral Kinematics and Facet Forces
,”
Eur. Spine J.
0940-6719,
6
(
3
), pp.
258
266
.
9.
Dunlop
,
R. B.
,
Adams
,
M. A.
, and
Hutton
,
W. C.
, 1984, “
Disc Space Narrowing and the Lumbar Facet Joints
,”
J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.
0301-620X,
66
(
5
), pp.
706
710
.
10.
Wiseman
,
C. M.
,
Lindsey
,
D. P.
,
Fredrick
,
A. D.
, and
Yerby
,
S. A.
, 2005, “
The Effect of an Interspinous Process Implant on Facet Loading During Extension
,”
Spine
0362-2436,
30
(
8
), pp.
903
907
.
11.
Wu
,
J. Z.
,
Herzog
,
W.
, and
Epstein
,
M.
, 1998, “
Effects of Inserting a Pressensor Film Into Articular Joints on the Actual Contact Mechanics
,”
ASME J. Biomech. Eng.
0148-0731,
120
(
5
), pp.
655
659
.
12.
Fischer
,
K. J.
,
Manson
,
T. T.
,
Pfaeffle
,
H. J.
,
Tomaino
,
M. M.
, and
Woo
,
S. L.
, 2001, “
A Method for Measuring Joint Kinematics Designed for Accurate Registration of Kinematic Data to Models Constructed From CT Data
,”
J. Biomech.
0021-9290,
34
(
3
), pp.
377
383
.
13.
Van Sint Jan
,
S.
,
Giurintano
,
D. J.
,
Thompson
,
D. E.
, and
Rooze
,
M.
, 1997, “
Joint Kinematics Simulation From Medical Imaging Data
,”
IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.
0018-9294,
44
(
12
), pp.
1175
1184
.
14.
Van Sint Jan
,
S.
,
Salvia
,
P.
,
Hilal
,
I.
,
Sholukha
,
V.
,
Rooze
,
M.
, and
Clapworthy
,
G.
, 2002, “
Registration of 6-DOFs Electrogoniometry and CT Medical Imaging for 3D Joint Modeling
,”
J. Biomech.
0021-9290,
35
(
11
), pp.
1475
1484
.
15.
Anderst
,
W. J.
, and
Tashman
,
S.
, 2003, “
A Method to Estimate In Vivo Dynamic Articular Surface Interaction
,”
J. Biomech.
0021-9290,
36
(
9
), pp.
1291
1299
.
16.
Haberl
,
H.
,
Cripton
,
P. A.
,
Orr
,
T. E.
,
Beutler
,
T.
,
Frei
,
H.
,
Lanksch
,
W. R.
, and
Nolte
,
L. P.
, 2004, “
Kinematic Response of Lumbar Functional Spinal Units to Axial Torsion With and Without Superimposed Compression and Flexion/Extension
,”
Eur. Spine J.
0940-6719,
13
(
6
), pp.
560
566
.
17.
Womack
,
W.
,
Woldtvedt
,
D.
, and
Puttlitz
,
C. M.
, 2008, “
Lower Cervical Spine Facet Cartilage Thickness Mapping
,”
Osteoarthritis Cartilage
1063-4584,
16
(
9
), pp.
1018
1023
.
18.
Yoganandan
,
N.
,
Knowles
,
S. A.
,
Maiman
,
D. J.
, and
Pintar
,
F. A.
, 2003, “
Anatomic Study of the Morphology of Human Cervical Facet Joint
,”
Spine
0362-2436,
28
(
20
), pp.
2317
2323
.
You do not currently have access to this content.