Two approaches are commonly used for handling frictional contact within the framework of the discrete element method (DEM). One relies on the complementarity method (CM) to enforce a nonpenetration condition and the Coulomb dry-friction model at the interface between two bodies in mutual contact. The second approach, called the penalty method (PM), invokes an elasticity argument to produce a frictional contact force that factors in the local deformation and relative motion of the bodies in contact. We give a brief presentation of a DEM-PM contact model that includes multi-time-step tangential contact displacement history. We show that its implementation in an open-source simulation capability called Chrono is capable of accurately reproducing results from physical tests typical of the field of geomechanics, i.e., direct shear tests on a monodisperse material. Keeping track of the tangential contact displacement history emerges as a key element of the model. We show that identical simulations using contact models that include either no tangential contact displacement history or only single-time-step tangential contact displacement history are unable to accurately model the direct shear test.
On the Importance of Displacement History in Soft-Body Contact Models
Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS. Manuscript received June 13, 2015; final manuscript received July 29, 2015; published online November 13, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Javier Cuadrado.
This material is declared a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
Fleischmann, J., Serban, R., Negrut, D., and Jayakumar, P. (November 13, 2015). "On the Importance of Displacement History in Soft-Body Contact Models." ASME. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam. July 2016; 11(4): 044502. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031197
Download citation file: