Abstract

This article provides a stochastic agent-based model to exhibit the role of aggregation metrics in order to mitigate polarization in a complex society. Our sociophysics model is based on interacting and nonlinear Brownian agents, which allow us to study the emergence of collective opinions. The opinion of an agent, xi(t) is a continuous positive value in an interval [0,1]. We find: (i) most agent-metrics display similar outcomes, (ii) The middle-metric and noisy-metric obtain new opinion dynamics either toward assimilation or fragmentation, and (iii) We show that a developed two-stage metric provide new insights about convergence and equilibria. In summary, our simulation demonstrates the power of institutions, which affect the emergence of collective behavior. Consequently, opinion formation in a decentralized complex society is reliant to the individual information processing and rules of collective behavior.

References

1.
Schweitzer
,
F.
,
Frivachy
,
T.
, and
Gracia
,
D.
,
2020
, “
An Agent-Based Model of Opinion Polarization Driven by Emotions
,”
Complexity
, p.
5282035
.
2.
Herzog
,
B.
,
2020
, Informationspopulismus in der liberalen Demokratie: Digitale Echokammern und anti-pluralistische Profilierung im Medienwettbewerb,
Populismus – Staat – Demokratie: Ein Interdisziplinäres Streitgespräch
,
Springer
, Wiesbaden, Germany, pp.
47
73
.
3.
Iyengar
,
S.
, and
Westwood
,
S.
,
2015
, “
Fear and Loathing Across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization
,”
Am. J. Pol. Sci.
,
59
(
3
), pp.
690
707
.10.1111/ajps.12152
4.
Wildford
,
A.
,
2017
, “
Polarization, Number of Parties, and Voter Turnout: Explaining Turnout in 26 OECD Countries
,”
Soc. Sci. Q.
,
98
(
5
), pp.
1391
1405
.10.1111/ssqu.12366
5.
Baldassarri
,
D.
, and
Gelman
,
A.
,
2008
, “
Partisans Without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinions
,”
Am. J. Sociol.
,
114
(
2
), pp.
408
446
.10.1086/590649
6.
French
,
J.
,
1956
, “
A Formal Theory of Social Power
,”
Psychol. Rev.
,
63
(
3
), pp.
181
194
.10.1037/h0046123
7.
Harary
,
F.
,
1959
, A Criterion for Unanimity in French's Theory of Social Power,
Studies in Social Power
,
Institute for Social Research
, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
8.
De Groot
,
M.
,
1974
, “
Reaching a Consensus
,”
J. Am. Stat. Assoc.
,
69
, pp.
118
121
.10.1080/01621459.1974.10480137
9.
Lehrer
,
K.
,
1975
, “
Social Consensus and Rational Agnoiology
,”
Synthese
,
31
(
1
), pp.
141
160
.10.1007/BF00869475
10.
Wagner
,
C.
,
1978
, “
Consensus Through Respect: A Model of Rational Group Decision-Making
,”
Philos. Stud.
,
34
(
4
), pp.
335
349
.10.1007/BF00364701
11.
Cohen
,
J.
,
Hajnal
,
J.
, and
Newman
,
C.
,
1986
, “
Approaching Consensus Can Be Delicate When Positions Harden
,”
Stochastic Proc. Appl.
,
22
, pp.
315
322
.
12.
Friedkin
,
N.
, and
Johnsen
,
E.
,
1990
, “
Social Influence and Opinions
,”
J. Math. Soc.
,
15
(
3–4
), pp.
193
206
.10.1080/0022250X.1990.9990069
13.
Hegselmann
,
R.
, and
Krause
,
U.
,
2002
, “
Opinion Dynamics and Bounded Confidence Models, Analysis,and Simulation
,”
J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.
,
5
(
3
), pp.
1
33
.http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/5/3/2.html
14.
Deffuant
,
G.
,
Neau
,
D.
,
Amblard
,
F.
, and
Weisbuch
,
G.
,
2000
, “
Mixing Beliefs Among Interacting Agents
,”
Adv. Complex Syst.
,
3
, pp.
87
98
.10.1142/S0219525900000078
15.
Castellano
,
C.
,
Fortunato
,
S.
, and
Loreto
,
V.
,
2009
, “
Statistical Physics of Social Dynamics
,”
Rev. Mod. Phys.
,
81
(
2
), pp.
591
646
.10.1103/RevModPhys.81.591
16.
Dornic
,
I.
,
Chaté
,
H.
,
Chave
,
J.
, and
Hinrichsen
,
H.
,
2001
, “
Critical Coarsening Without Surface Tension: The Universality Class of the Voter Model
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
,
87
(
4
), p.
045701
.10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.045701
17.
Banisch
,
S.
,
2014
, “
From Microscopic Heterogeneity to Macroscopic Complexity in the Contrain Voter Model
,”
Adv. Complex Syst.
,
17
(
5
), p.
1450025
.10.1142/S0219525914500258
18.
Fernández-Gracia
,
J.
,
Suchecki
,
K.
,
Ramasco
,
J. J.
,
San Miguel
,
M.
, and
Eguíluz
,
V. M.
,
2014
, “
Is the Voter Model a Model for Voters?
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
,
112
(
15
), p.
158701
.10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.158701
19.
Herzog
,
B.
,
2015
, “
An Econophysics Model of Financial Bubbles
,”
Nat. Sci.
,
7
(
1
), pp.
55
63
.10.4236/ns.2015.71006
20.
Herzog
,
B.
,
2015
, “
Quantum Model of Decision-Making in Economics
,”
J. Quantum Inf. Sci.
,
5
(
1
), pp.
1
5
.10.4236/jqis.2015.51001
21.
Schweitzer
,
F.
,
2018
, “
Sociophysics
,”
Phys. Today
,
71
(
2
), pp.
40
46
.10.1063/PT.3.3845
22.
Banisch
,
S.
, and
Olbrich
,
E.
,
2019
, “
Opinion Polarization by Learning From Social Feedback
,”
J. Math. Sociol.
,
43
(
2
), pp.
76
103
.10.1080/0022250X.2018.1517761
23.
Schweighöfer
,
S.
,
Garcia
,
D.
, and
Schweitzer
,
F.
,
2020
, “
An Agent-Based Model of Multi-Dimensional Opinion Dynamics and Opinion Alignment
,”
Chaos
,
30
(
9
), p.
093139
.10.1063/5.0007523
24.
Becker
,
J.
,
Brackbill
,
D.
, and
Centola
,
D.
,
2017
, “
Network Dynamics of Social Influence in the Wisdom of Crowds
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A
,
114
(
26
), pp.
5070
5076
.10.1073/pnas.1615978114
25.
Navajas
,
J.
,
Niella
,
T.
,
Garbulsky
,
G.
,
Bahrami
,
B.
, and
Sigman
,
M.
,
2018
, “
Aggregated Knowledge From a Small Number of Debates Outperforms the Wisdom of Large Crowds
,”
Nat. Hum. Behav.
,
2
(
2
), pp.
126
132
.10.1038/s41562-017-0273-4
26.
Mavrodiev
,
P.
, and
Schweitzer
,
F.
,
2021
, “
The Ambiguous Role of Social Influence on the Wisdom of Crowds: An Analytical Approach
,”
Phys. A
,
567
, p.
125624
.10.1016/j.physa.2020.125624
27.
Datseris
,
G.
,
Vahdati
,
A. R.
, and
DuBois
,
T. C.
,
2022
, “
Agents.jl: A Performant and Feature-Full Agent Based Modelling Software of Minimal Code Complexity
,”
Simulation
, epub.10.1177/00375497211068820
28.
Schweitzer
,
F.
,
2020
, The law of proportionate growth and its siblings: Applications in agent-based modeling of socio-economic systems,
Complexity, Heterogeneity, and the Method of Statistical Physics in Economics
,
Springer
,
Tokyo
, pp.
145
176
.
29.
Albarracin
,
D.
, and
Jung
,
H.
,
2021
, “
A Research Agenda for the Post-Covid-19 World: Theory and Research in Social Psychology
,”
Asian J. Soc. Psychol.
,
24
(
1
), pp.
10
17
.10.1111/ajsp.12469
You do not currently have access to this content.