Coordinate measuring machines (CMMs) with continuous-contact scanning capabilities are experiencing more and more use in a wide variety of discrete-part manufacturing industries. Many users of these CMMs, if asked, will say that their metrology requirements include high density scans at high speeds with high accuracy. These requirements are in conflict, as there will be some point at which the accuracy of the scanned data begins to decrease with an increase in the scanning speed. This paper addresses the effects of scanning speed on the performance of different CMMs using contact sensors. The use of a family of artifacts is proposed in order to evaluate the relative scanning performance as a function of scanning speed and the direction of the scan within the CMM volume. The artifacts that are developed for these tests have a sinusoidal waveform superimposed on a flat surface. This paper describes a series of experiments that utilize these artifacts and assess the ability of these tests to capture how a scanning CMM will perform when measuring actual parts.

1.
Ni
,
J.
, and
Wäldele
,
F.
, 1995,
Coordinate Measuring Machines and Systems
,
J. A.
Bosch
, ed.,
Marcel Dekker
, New York, Chap. 2.
2.
Wilhelm
,
R. G.
,
Hocken
,
R. J.
, and
Schwenke
,
H.
, 2001, “
Task Specific Uncertainty in Coordinate Measurement
,”
CIRP Ann.
0007-8506,
50
(
2
), pp.
553
563
.
3.
ANSI B89.4.1, 1997, “
Methods for Performance Evaluation of Coordinate Measuring Machines
,” ASME, New York.
4.
ISO 10360-2, 2001, Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Acceptance and Reverification Tests for Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMM)—Part 2: CMMs Used for Measuring Size, International Organization for Standardization.
5.
ISO 10360-4, 2000, Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Acceptance and Reverification Tests for Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMM)—Part 4: CMMs Used in Scanning Measuring Mode, International Organization for Standardization.
6.
Morse
,
E. P.
, 2004, “
Testing Scanning CMMs—How Much Do the Standard Tests Tell Us?
,”
Proc. International Dimensional Workshop
, Nashville, May 10–14 (CD-ROM), IDW2004/Morse.
7.
Muralidhar
,
A.
, 1998, “
Characterization of Scanning Probe CMMs
,” M.S. thesis, UNC Charlotte, Charlotte.
8.
Pereira
,
P. H.
, 2001, “
Characterization and Compensation of Dynamic Errors of a Scanning Coordinate Measuring Machine
,” Ph.D. thesis, UNC Charlotte, Charlotte.
9.
Pereira
,
P. H.
, and
Hocken
,
R. J.
, 2007, “
Characterization and Compensation of Dynamic Errors of a Scanning Coordinate Measuring Machine
,”
Precis. Eng.
0141-6359,
31
(
1
), pp.
22
32
.
10.
Freire
,
A. S.
, 2000, “
Dynamic Performance of a Coordinate Measuring Machine Measuring Small Radii, Corners and Edges
,” Ph.D. thesis, UNC Charlotte, Charlotte.
11.
Haworth
,
W. J.
, 2003, “
Parameter Optimization for Analog Scanning With the Coordinate Measuring Machine
,” private communication.
12.
Muralikrishnan
,
B.
, and
Raja
,
J.
, 2004, “
Inference Engine for Process Diagnostics and Functional Correlation in Surface Metrology
,”
Wear
0043-1648,
257
(
12
), pp.
1257
1263
.
13.
Overcash
,
J. L.
, and
Cuttino
,
J. F.
, 2004, “
Tunable Ultrasonic Vibration-Assisted Diamond Turning of Steel
,”
Proc. ASPE 19th Annual Meeting
, Orlando, October 24–29,
ASPE
,
Raleigh, NC
, pp.
76
79
.
14.
Evans
,
C. J.
,
Hocken
,
R. J.
, and
Estler
,
W. T.
, 1996, “
Self-Calibration: Reversal, Redundancy, Error Separation and ‘Absolute Testing’
,”
CIRP Ann.
0007-8506,
45
(
2
), pp.
617
634
.
You do not currently have access to this content.