This paper presents an optimization ontology and its implementation into a prototype computational knowledge-based tool dubbed ONTOP (ontology for optimization). Salient feature of ONTOP include a knowledge base that incorporates both standardized optimization terminology, formal method definitions, and often unrecorded optimization details, such as any idealizations and assumptions that may be made when creating an optimization model, as well as the model developer’s rationale and justification behind these idealizations and assumptions. ONTOP was developed using Protégé, a Java-based, free open-source ontology development environment created by Stanford University. Two engineering design optimization case studies are presented. The first case study consists of the optimization of a structural beam element and demonstrates ONTOP’s ability to address the variations in an optimal solution that may arise when different techniques and approaches are used. A second case study, a more complex design problem that deals with the optimization of an impeller of a pediatric left ventricular heart assist device, demonstrates the wealth of knowledge ONTOP is able to capture. Together, these test beds help illustrate the potential value of an ontology in representing application-specific knowledge while facilitating both the sharing and exchanging of this knowledge in engineering design optimization.

1.
Weihe
,
K.
, 2002, “
Optimization Algorithms—Basic Terminology
,” edited by
T. U.
Darmstadt
, Germany, www.algo.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/lehre/2002ss/optalgo/grundlagen.pswww.algo.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/lehre/2002ss/optalgo/grundlagen.ps
2.
Messac
,
A.
, and
Chen
,
W.
, 2000, “
The Engineering Design Discipline: Is Its Confounding Lexicon Hindering its Evolution
?”
Engineering Evaluation and Cost Analysis
, special edition on “Decision-Based Design: Status & Promise,”
3
(
1-2
), pp.
67
88
.
3.
Vanderplaats
,
G. N.
, 2001,
Numerical Optimization Techniques for Engineering Design
, 3rd ed.,
Vanderplaats Research & Development
.
5.
Mathsoft Engineering & Education, Inc.
, Mathcad, http://www.mathcad.com/http://www.mathcad.com/
6.
Fourer
,
R.
,
Gay
,
D. M.
, and
Kernighan
,
B. W.
, 2002,
AMPL-A Modeling Language for Mathematical Programming
,
Duxbury Press, Brooks/Cole Publishing
,
Belmont, MA
.
7.
Fourer
,
R.
,
Gay
,
D. M.
, and
Kernighan
,
B. W.
, 1990, “
A Modeling Language for Mathematical Programming
,”
Manage. Sci.
0025-1909,
36
,
519
554
.
11.
Delen
,
D.
,
Benjamin
,
P.
, and
Erraguntla
,
M.
, 1998, “
Integrated Modeling and Analysis Generator Environment (IMAGE): A Decision Support Tool
,”
Winter Simulation Conference
.
12.
American Association for Artificial Intelligence
, http://www.aaai.org/http://www.aaai.org/
14.
Ferguson
,
J.
, and
Goldie
,
S.
, 2000, “
Applied Artificial Intelligence and the Management of Knowledge
,”
Bristol Bus. Sch. Teach. Res. Rev.
,
3
.
15.
Gincel
,
R.
, 2004, “
Refining Enterprise Search
,” Infoworld, October, pp.
1
3
.
16.
Gruber
,
T. R.
, 1993, “
A Translation Approach to Portable Ontologies
,”
Knowl. Acquis.
1042-8143,
5
(
2
) pp.
199
220
.
17.
Ahmed
,
S.
,
Kim
,
S.
, and
Wallace
,
K.
, 2005, “
A Methodology for Creating Ontologies for Engineering Design
,”
ASME IDETC/CIE
.
18.
Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary, C., 1972,
G.&C. Merriam-Webster, Inc.
,
Springfield, MA
, p.
590
.
19.
Musen
,
M. A.
,
Fergerson
,
R. W.
,
Grosso
,
W. E.
,
Noy
,
N. F.
,
Crubezy
,
M.
, and
Gennari
,
J. H.
, 2000, “
Component-Based Support for Building Knowledge-Acquisition Systems
,”
Conference on Intelligent Information Processing (IIP 2000) of the International Federation for Information Processing World Computer Congress (WCC 2000)
, Beijing.
20.
Grosse
,
I. R.
,
Milton-Benoit
,
J. M.
, and
Wileden
,
J.
, 2005, “
Ontologies for Supporting Engineering Analysis Models
,”
Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf.
0890-0604,
19
(
1
), pp.
1
18
.
21.
Witherell
,
P. W.
,
Grosse
,
I. R.
, and
Krishnamurty
,
S.
, 2005, “
Ontologies and Tools for Supporting Decision-Based Design
,”
International Conference for E-Design
, Orlando.
22.
Bajaj
,
M.
,
Paredis
,
C. J.
,
Rathnam
,
T.
, and
Peak
,
R.
, 2005, “
Federated Product Models for Enabling Simulation-Based Product Lifecycle Management
,”
2005 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
, Orlando.
23.
Liang
,
V. C.
, and
Paredis
,
C. J.
, 2004, “
A Port Ontology for Conceptual Design of Systems
,”
ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng.
1530-9827,
4
(
3
), pp.
206
217
.
24.
Ciocoiu
,
M.
,
Nau
,
D.
, and
Gruninger
,
M.
, 2001, “
Onotlogies for Integrating Engineering Applications
,”
ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng.
1530-9827,
1
, pp.
12
22
.
25.
Dolan
,
E.
,
Fourer
,
R.
,
Goux
,
J.
, and
Munson
,
T.
, 2002, “
Kestrel: An Interface From Modeling Systems to the NEOS Server
,” Technical Report,
Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory
.
26.
Schwabacher
,
M.
,
Ellman
,
T.
, and
Hirsh
,
H.
, 1998, “
Learning to Set Up Numerical Optimizations of Engineering Designs
,”
Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf.
0890-0604,
12
(
2
), pp.
173
192
.
27.
28.
Gennari
,
J.
,
Musen
,
M. A.
,
Fergerson
,
R. W.
,
Grosso
,
W. E.
,
Crubézy
,
M.
,
Eriksson
,
H.
,
Noy
,
N. F.
, and
Tu
,
S. W.
, 2002, “
The Evolution of Protégé: An Environment for Knowledge-Based Systems Development
,”
Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud.
1071-5819,
58
(
1
), pp.
89
123
.
29.
Noy
,
N. F.
,
Sintek
,
M.
,
Decker
,
S.
,
Crubezy
,
M.
,
Fergerson
,
R. W.
, and
Musen
,
M. A.
, 2001, “
Creating Semantic Web Contents With Protege-2000
,”
IEEE Intell. Syst.
1094-7167,
16
(
2
),
60
71
.
30.
Gruber
,
T.
, and
Olsen
,
G.
, 1994, “
An Ontology for Engineering Mathematics
,”
Proc. of 4th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning
,
Morgan Kaufmann
,
San Mateo, CA
,
Doyle
,
J.
,
Torasso
P.
, and
Sandewall
,
E.
, eds., pp.
258
269
..
31.
Gruber
,
T. R.
, 1993, “
Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing
,”
Padua Workshop on Formal Ontology
, March.
32.
33.
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), http://www.w3.org/XML/http://www.w3.org/XML/
34.
Lin
,
J.
,
Fox
,
M. S.
, and
Bilgic
,
T.
, 1996, “
A Requirement Ontology for Engineering Design
,”
Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl.
1063-293X,
4
(
3
), pp.
279
291
.
You do not currently have access to this content.