This study concerns a concept for an optimal control of the force developed in an automotive restraint system during a frontal impact. The concept is close to that of “smart” restraint systems and involves continuous control of the restraint force by moving the point of attachment of the restraint system to the vehicle or retracting and releasing the seat belts. The analytical foundation for the control of the restraining force does not appear to have been formulated prior to this study. The control design involves the limiting performance analysis of the isolation of an occupant from the crash impact and the formation of a feedback to sustain the open-loop control law that provides the limiting performance. Initially, the problem is outlined using a single-degree-of-freedom system and solved for optimal isolator characteristics. This exercise shows that the optimal force is constant and that the performance of a restraint system behaving as a linear spring is half as effective as the optimal. The methodology is then applied to a published thoracic model having multiple degrees of freedom. A set of functionals is defined as constraints corresponding to injury criteria and the displacement of the occupant relative to the vehicle. The characteristics of the optimal isolator force are then determined. It is shown that this force has a short-duration period of high magnitude early in the profile, followed by an interval of nearly constant force. Next it is shown that a restraint behaving as a linear spring can generate the optimal control force if its attachment point in the vehicle is allowed to move. The design of the control law for this motion involves the determination of an optimal open-loop control and the formation of a feedback to sustain this control. Forms for both of these are presented. A substantial improvement in the behavior of an automobile occupant’s restraint systems can be anticipated from an active control of the seat belt retraction.

1.
NHTSA
, 1999, “
Fourth Report to Congress—Effectiveness of Occupant Protection Systems and their Use
,” National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington DC.
2.
Rouhana
,
S.
,
Bedewi
,
P.
,
Kankanala
,
S.
,
Prasad
,
P.
,
Zwolinski
,
J.
,
Meduvsky
,
A.
,
Rupp
,
J.
,
Jeffreys
,
T.
, and
Schneider
,
L.
, 2003, “
Biomechanics of 4-Point Seat Belt Systems in Frontal Impacts
,”
Proc. Stapp Car Crash Conf.
0585-086X,
47
, pp.
367
400
.
3.
Bostrom
,
O.
, and
Haland
,
Y.
, 2003, “
Benefits of a 3+2 Point Belt System and an Inboard Torso Side Support in Frontal, Far-Side and Rollover Crashes
,”
18th Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV)
,
Nagoya, Japan
, Paper 451.
4.
Viano
,
D.
, 2003, “
Lap-shoulder Belts: Some Historical Aspects
,” In
Seat Belts: The Development of an Essential Safety Feature
,
D.
Viano
, ed.,
Society of Automotive Engineers
,
Warrendale, PA
, 2003, PT-92.
5.
Haland
,
Y.
, and
Skanberg
,
T.
, 1989, “
A Mechanical Buckle Pretensioner to Improve a Three Point Seat Belt
,”
Proc. 12th International Technical Conference on ESV
,
Gothenburg, Sweden
, Paper 896134.
6.
Adomeit
,
D.
, and
Balser
,
W.
, 1987, “
Items of an Engineering Program on an Advanced Web-Clamp Device
,” Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, Paper 870328.
7.
Foret-Bruno
,
J.-Y.
,
Trosseille
,
X.
,
Le Coz
,
J.-Y.
,
Bendjellal
,
F.
, and
Steyer
,
C.
, 1998, “
Thoracic Injury Risk in Frontal Car Crashes With Occupant Restrained With Belt Load Limiter
,”
Proc. 42nd Stapp Car Crash Conference
, Society of Automotive Engineers,
Warrendale, PA
, pp.
331
952
, Paper 983166.
8.
Foret-Bruno
,
J.-Y.
,
Trosseille
,
X.
,
Page
,
Y.
,
Huere
,
J.-F
,
Le Coz
,
J.-Y.
,
Bendjellal
,
F.
,
Diboine
,
A.
,
Phalempin
,
T.
,
Villeforceix
,
D.
,
Baudrit
,
P.
,
Guillemot
,
H.
, and
Coltat
,
J.-C.
, 2001, “
Comparison of Thoracic Injury Risk in Frontal Car Crashes for Occupants Restrained Without Belt Load Limiters and those Restrained With 6kN and 4kN Belt Load Limiters
,”
Proc. Stapp Car Crash Conf.
0585-086X,
45
, pp.
205
224
.
9.
Crandall
,
J.
,
Bass
,
C.
,
Pilkey
,
W.
,
Morgan
,
R.
,
Eppinger
,
R.
,
Miller
,
H.
, and
Sikorski
,
J.
, 1997, “
Thoracic Response and Injury With Belt, Driver Side Air Bag, and Constant Force Retractor Restraints
,”
Int. J. Crashworthiness
1358-8265,
2
(
1
), pp.
119
132
.
10.
Kent
,
R.
,
Lessley
,
D.
,
Shaw
,
G.
, and
Crandall
,
J.
, 2003, “
The Utility of Hybrid III and THOR Chest Deflection for Discriminating Between Standard and Force-Limiting Belt Systems
,”
Proc. Stapp Car Crash Conf.
0585-086X,
47
, pp.
267
297
.
11.
Petitjean
,
A.
,
Lebarbe
,
M.
,
Potier
,
P.
,
Trosseille
,
X.
, and
Lassau
,
J.
, 2002, “
Laboratory Reconstructions of Real World Frontal Crash Configurations Using the Hybrid III and THOR Dummies and PMHS
,”
Proc. Stapp Car Crash Conf.
0585-086X,
46
, pp.
27
54
.
12.
Miller
,
H.
, 1995, “
Injury Reduction With Smart Restraint Systems
,”
Proceedings, 39th Annual Conference of the Assoc. Adv. Automotive Med.
,
Des Plaines, IL
, March∕April, pp.
527
541
.
13.
Johannessen
,
H.
, and
Mackay
,
M.
, 1995, “
Why “Intelligent” Automotive Occupant Restraint Systems?
Proceedings, 39th Annual Conference of the Assoc. Adv. Automotive Med.
,
Des Plaines, IL
, March∕April, pp.
519
526
.
14.
Fredin
,
S.
, 1995, “
Injury Reduction Potential for ‘Smart’ Airbags
,”
Proc. 39th Annual Conference of the Assoc. Adv. Automotive Med.
,
Des Plaines, IL
, March∕April, pp.
557
566
.
15.
Bernat
,
A.
, 1995, “
Smart” Safety Belts for Injury Reduction
,”
Proc. 39th Annual Conference of the Assoc. Adv. Automotive Med.
,
Des Plaines, IL
, March∕April, pp.
567
576
.
16.
Andrews
,
S.
, “
Occupant Sensing in Smart Restraint Systems
,”
Proc. 39th Annual Conference of the Assoc. Adv. Automotive Med.
,
Des Plaines, IL
, March∕April, pp.
543
555
.
17.
Sevin
,
E.
, and
Pilkey
,
W. D.
, 1971,
Optimum Shock and Vibration Isolation
,
Shock and Vibration Information Analysis Center
,
Washington DC
.
18.
Balandin
,
D. V.
,
Bolotnik
,
N. N.
, and
Pilkey
,
W. D.
, 2001,
Optimal Protection from Impact, Shock, and Vibration
,
Taylor and Francis Publishers
,
Philadelphia, PA
.
19.
Lobdell
,
T. E.
,
Kroell
,
C. K.
,
Schneider
,
D. C.
,
Hering
,
W. E.
, and
Nahum
,
A. M.
, 1973, “
Impact Response of the Human Thorax
,” in
W. F.
King
, and
H. J.
Mertz
, eds.,
Human Impact Response Measurement and Simulation
,
Plenum Press
,
New York-London
, pp.
201
245
.
20.
Hesseling
,
R. J.
,
Steinbuch
,
M.
,
Veldpaus
,
F. E.
, and
Klisch
,
T.
, 2006, “
Feedback Control of Occupant Motion During a Crash
,”
Int. J. Crashworthiness
1358-8265,
11
, pp.
81
96
.
21.
Kent
,
R.
,
Bass
,
C.
,
Woods
,
W.
,
Sherwood
,
C.
,
Madeley
,
N.-J.
,
Salzar
,
R.
, and
Kitagawa
,
Y.
, 2003, “
Muscle Tetanus and Loading Effects on the Elastic and Viscous Characteristics of the Thorax
,”
Traffic Injury Prevention
, 4, pp.
297
314
.
22.
Eppinger
,
R.
et al.
, 1999, “
Development of Improved Injury Criteria for the Assessment of Advanced Automotive Restraint Systems
,” II. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.
23.
Crandall
,
J. R.
,
Cheng
,
Z.
, and
Pilkey
,
W. D.
, 2000, “
Limiting Performance of Seat Belt Systems for the Prevention of Thoracic Injuries
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part D (J. Automob. Eng.)
0954-4070,
214
, pp.
127
139
.
You do not currently have access to this content.