This paper documents new command shapers designed to both eliminate the residual vibration and reduce the transient deflection of a flexible system. Equations are derived to predict both the residual vibration and the transient deflection for a mass-spring-damper system with position input, or equivalently, a mass under PD control. The solution of equations containing constraints on both the transient deflection and the residual vibration leads to the creation of specified-deflection, zero-vibration command shapers. These specified-deflection shapers limit the transient deflection to a predetermined ratio of the base line deflection resulting from an arbitrary reference command. Computer simulations and experiments on a bridge crane verify the efficacy of the new command shapers.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
November 2007
Technical Briefs
Specified-Deflection Command Shapers for Second-Order Position Input Systems
Michael J. Robertson,
Michael J. Robertson
Weapons and Systems Engineering Department,
United States Naval Academy
, Annapolis, MD 21402
Search for other works by this author on:
William E. Singhose
William E. Singhose
Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology
, Atlanta, GA 30332
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael J. Robertson
Weapons and Systems Engineering Department,
United States Naval Academy
, Annapolis, MD 21402
William E. Singhose
Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology
, Atlanta, GA 30332J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control. Nov 2007, 129(6): 856-859 (4 pages)
Published Online: June 13, 2007
Article history
Received:
October 13, 2005
Revised:
June 13, 2007
Citation
Robertson, M. J., and Singhose, W. E. (June 13, 2007). "Specified-Deflection Command Shapers for Second-Order Position Input Systems." ASME. J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control. November 2007; 129(6): 856–859. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2789476
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Robust Periodical Tracking for Fast Tool Servo Systems With Selective Disturbance Compensation
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (August 2022)
Feasibility of a Wearable Cold-Gas Thruster for Fall Prevention
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (August 2022)
Comparing Three Different Decoupling Control Approaches for Roll-To-Roll Printing Systems
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control
Saturated Output Feedback Control for Robot Manipulators with Joints of Arbitrary Flexibility
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control
Related Articles
Comparison of Methods for Modeling a Hydraulic Loader Crane With Flexible Translational Links
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (October,2015)
Dynamics and Control of a Small-Scale Boom Crane
J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam (July,2011)
Optimal Dynamic Absorbers for Plate Vibration Control
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (December,1975)
Quarter-Cycle Switching Control for Switch-Shunted Dampers
J. Vib. Acoust (April,2004)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Research on Autobody Panels Developmental Technology Based on Reverse Engineering
Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Technologies (MIMT 2010)
Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics
Flow Induced Vibration of Power and Process Plant Components: A Practical Workbook
Codes in Action Recent Highlights and Milestones
The Code: An Authorized History of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code