A desired compensation adaptive robust control (DCARC) framework is presented for nonlinear systems having both parametric uncertainties and uncertain nonlinearities. The paper first considers a class of higher order nonlinear systems transformable to a normal form with matched model uncertainties. For this class of uncertain systems, the desired values of all states for tracking a known desired trajectory can be predetermined and the usual desired compensation concept can be used to synthesize DCARC laws. The paper then focuses on systems with unmatched model uncertainties, in which the desired values of the intermediate state variables for perfect output tracking of a known desired trajectory cannot be predetermined. A novel way of formulating desired compensation concept is proposed and a DCARC backstepping design is developed to overcome the design difficulties associated with unmatched model uncertainties. The proposed DCARC framework has the unique feature that the adaptive model compensation and the regressor depend on the reference output trajectory and on-line parameter estimates only. Such a structure has several implementation advantages. First, the adaptive model compensation is always bounded when projection type adaption law is used, and thus does not affect the closed-loop system stability. As a result, the interaction between the parameter adaptation and the robust control law is reduced, which may facilitate the controller gain tuning process considerably. Second, the effect of measurement noise on the adaptive model compensation and on the parameter adaptation law is minimized. Consequently, a faster adaptation rate can be chosen in implementation to speed up the transient response and to improve overall tracking performance. These claims have been verified in the comparative experimental studies of several applications.

1.
Krstic
,
M.
,
Kanellakopoulos
,
I.
, and
Kokotovic
,
P. V.
, 1995,
Nonlinear and Adaptive Control Design
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
2.
Marino
,
R.
, and
Tomei
,
P.
, 1995,
Nonlinear Control Design: Geometric, Adaptive, and Robust
,
Prentice-Hall
,
London
.
3.
Yao
,
B.
, and
Tomizuka
,
M.
, 1995, “
Adaptive Control of Robot Manipulators in Constrained Motion—Controller Design
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
117
(
3
), pp.
320
328
.
4.
Ioannou
,
P. A.
, and
Sun
,
J.
, 1996,
Robust Adaptive Control
,
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
.
5.
Utkin
,
V. I.
, 1992,
Sliding Modes in Control Optimization
,
Springer-Verlag
,
Berlin
.
6.
Corless
,
M. J.
, and
Leitmann
,
G.
, 1981, “
Continuous State Feedback Guaranteeing Uniform Ultimate Boundedness for Uncertain Dynamic Systems
,”
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control
0018-9286,
26
(
5
), pp.
1139
1144
.
7.
Qu
,
Z.
, and
Dorsey
,
J. F.
, 1991, “
Robust Control of Generalized Dynamic Systems Without Matching Conditions
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
113
, pp.
582
589
.
8.
Hedrick
,
J. K.
, and
Yip
,
P. P.
, 2000, “
Multiple Sliding Surface Control: Theory and Application
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
122
(
4
), pp.
586
593
.
9.
Polycarpou
,
M. M.
, and
Ioannou
,
P. A.
, 1993, “
A Robust Adaptive Nonlinear Control Design
,”
Proceedings of the American Control Conference
, pp.
1365
1369
.
10.
Freeman
,
R. A.
,
Krstic
,
M.
, and
Kokotovic
,
P. V.
, 1998, “
Robustness of Adaptive Nonlinear Control to Bounded Uncertainties
,”
Automatica
0005-1098,
34
(
10
), pp.
1227
1230
.
11.
Ikhouane
,
F.
, and
Krstic
,
M.
, 1998, “
Adaptive Backstepping With Parameter Projection: Robustness and Asymptotic Performance
,”
Automatica
0005-1098,
34
(
4
), pp.
429
435
.
12.
Yao
,
B.
, and
Tomizuka
,
M.
, 1996, “
Smooth Robust Adaptive Sliding Mode Control of Robot Manipulators With Guaranteed Transient Performance
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
118
(
4
), pp.
764
775
.
13.
Yao
,
B.
, and
Tomizuka
,
M.
, 1997, “
Adaptive Robust Control of SISO Nonlinear Systems in a Semi-Strict Feedback Form
,”
Automatica
0005-1098,
33
(
5
), pp.
893
900
.
14.
Yao
,
B.
, and
Tomizuka
,
M.
, 2001, “
Adaptive Robust Control of MIMO Nonlinear Systems in Semi-Strict Feedback Forms
,”
Automatica
0005-1098,
37
(
9
), pp.
1305
1321
.
15.
Yao
,
B.
, 1997, “
High Performance Adaptive Robust Control of Nonlinear Systems: A General Framework and New Schemes
,”
Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control
, San Diego, CA, pp.
2489
2494
.
16.
Yao
,
B.
, and
Tomizuka
,
M.
, “
Comparative Experiments of Robust and Adaptive Control With New Robust Adaptive Controllers for Robot Manipulators
,”
Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control
, Orlando, CA, pp. 1290–1295, 1994.
17.
Yao
,
B.
,
Al-Majed
,
M.
, and
Tomizuka
,
M.
, 1997, “
High Performance Robust Motion Control of Machine Tools: An Adaptive Robust Control Approach and Comparative Experiments
,”
IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron.
1083-4435,
2
(
2
), pp.
63
76
.
18.
Xu
,
L.
, and
Yao
,
B.
, 2001, “
Adaptive Robust Precision Motion Control of Linear Motors With Negligible Electrical Dynamics: Theory and Experiments
,”
IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron.
1083-4435,
6
(
4
), pp.
444
452
.
19.
Yao
,
B.
,
Bu
,
F.
,
Reedy
,
J.
, and
Chiu
,
G. T.-C.
, 2000, “
Adaptive Robust Control of Single-Rod Hydraulic Actuators: Theory and Experiments
,”
IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron.
1083-4435,
5
(
1
), pp.
79
91
.
20.
Yao
,
B.
, and
Tomizuka
,
M.
, 1998, “
Adaptive Robust Motion and Force Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators in Contact With Compliant Surfaces With Unknown Stiffness
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
120
(
2
), pp.
232
240
.
21.
Reed
,
J. S.
, and
Ioannou
,
P. A.
, 1989, “
Instability Analysis and Robust Adaptive Control of Robotic Manipulators
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
1042-296X,
5
(
3
), pp.
381
386
.
22.
Sadegh
,
N.
, and
Horowitz
,
R.
, 1990, “
Stability and Robustness Analysis of a Class of Adaptive Controllers for Robot Manipulators
,”
Int. J. Robot. Res.
0278-3649,
9
(
3
), pp.
74
92
.
23.
Yao
,
B.
, and
Tomizuka
,
M.
, 1994, “
Robust Desired Compensation Adaptive Control of Robot Manipulators With Guaranteed Transient Performance
,”
Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation
, San Diego, CA, pp.
1830
1836
.
24.
Hong
,
Y.
, and
Yao
,
B.
, 2007, “
A Globally Stable Saturated Desired Compensation Adaptive Robust Control for Linear Motor Systems With Comparative Experiments
,”
Automatica
0005-1098,
43
(
10
), pp.
1840
1848
.
25.
Bu
,
F.
, and
Yao
,
B.
, 2001, “
Desired Compensation Adaptive Robust Control of Single-Rod Electro-Hydraulic Actuator
,”
American Control Conference
, Arlington, TX, pp.
3926
3931
.
You do not currently have access to this content.