The flow fields in the orifice and the confinement region of a normally impinging, axisymmetric, confined, and submerged liquid jet were computationally investigated. Numerical predictions were made for orifice diameters of 3.18 and 6.35 mm at several orifice-to-target plate spacings, with turbulent jet Reynolds number ranging from 8500 to 23,000. The commercial finite-volume code FLUENT was used to solve the flow fields using a modified k–ε model based on renormalization group theory. The predicted characteristics of the separation region at the entrance of the orifice agree with experiments in the literature. The pressure drop across the orifice was predicted to within 5 percent of proposed empirical correlations based on published experimental data. The computed flow patterns in the confinement region of the impinging jet were in good qualitative agreement with flow visualizations; however, a secondary recirculation zone observed in experiments was not predicted by the models. The results presented for the flow (and pressure drop) in the orifice, as well as that in the confined outflow region, influence heat transfer on the impingement surface and are important considerations in electronics packaging design.

1.
Chang, C. T., Kocamustafaogullari, G., Landis, F., and Downing, S., 1993, “Single and Multiple Liquid Jet Impingement Heat Transfer,” ASME National Heat Transfer Conference, HTD-246, ASME, NY, pp. 43–52.
2.
Fluent, 1993, FLUENT User’s Manual-Volume 1, Version 4.23, Fluent, Inc., Lebanon, NH.
3.
Garimella
S. V.
, and
Nenaydykh
B.
,
1996
, “
Nozzle-Geometry Effects in Liquid Jet Impingement Heat Transfer
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
, Vol.
39
, pp.
2915
2923
.
4.
Garimella
S. V.
, and
Rice
R. A.
,
1995
, “
Confined and Submerged Liquid Jet Impingement Heat Transfer
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER
, Vol.
117
, pp.
871
877
.
5.
Hosseinalipour
S. M.
, and
Mujumdar
A. S.
,
1995
, “
Comparative Evaluation of Different Turbulence Models for Confined Impinging and Opposing Jet Flows
,”
Num. Heat Transfer
, Vol.
28
, pp.
647
666
.
6.
Hutchinson
B. R.
, and
Raithby
G. D.
,
1986
, “
A Multigrid Method Based on Additive Correction Strategy
,”
Num. Heat Transfer
, Vol.
9
, pp.
511
537
.
7.
Kirtley
K. R.
,
1992
, “
Renormalization Group Based Algebraic Turbulence Model for Three-Dimensional Turbomachinery Flows
,”
AIAA Journal
, Vol.
30
, No.
6
, pp.
1500
1506
.
8.
McGuinness, M. D., 1978, “Flow with a Separation Bubble: Steady and Unsteady Aspects,” Ph.D. dissertation, Cambridge University Engineering Department, Cambridge, UK.
9.
Mohanty
A. K.
, and
Tawfek
A. A.
,
1993
, “
Heat Transfer Due to a Round Jet Impinging Normal to a Flat Surface
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
, Vol.
36
, pp.
1639
1647
.
10.
Morris
G. K.
,
Garimella
S. V.
, and
Amano
R. S.
,
1996
, “
Prediction of Jet Impingement Heat Transfer Using a Hybrid Wall Treatment With Different Turbulent Prandtl Number Functions
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER
, Vol.
118
, pp.
562
569
.
11.
Obot, N. T., Douglas, W. J. M., and Mujumdar, A. S., 1982, “Effect of Semi-Confinement on Impingement Heat Transfer,” Procs. 7th International Heat Transfer Conf., Vol. 3, pp. 395–400.
12.
Obot, N. T., Majumdar, A. S., and Douglas, W. J. M., 1979, “The Effect or Nozzle Geometry on Impingement Heat Transfer Under a Round Turbulent Jet,” ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Paper #s79-WA/HT-53.
13.
Polat
S.
,
1993
, “
Heat and Mass Transfer in Impingement Drying
,”
Int. J. Drying Technol.
, Vol.
11
, No.
5
, pp.
1147
1176
.
14.
Polat, S., Huang, B., Mujumdar, A. S., and Douglas, W. J. M., 1989, “Numerical Flow and Heat Transfer Under Impinging Jets: A Review,” Ann. Rev. of Num. Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer, Vol. 2, Hemisphere, New York, pp. 157–197.
15.
Rice, R. A., and Garimella, S. V., 1994, “Heat Transfer from Discrete Heat Sources Using an Axisymmetric, Submerged and Confined Liquid Jet,” Proc. 1994 Int. Heat Transfer Conf., Vol. 3, Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 89–94.
16.
Schafer
D.
,
Incropera
F. P.
, and
Ramadhyani
S.
,
1991
, “
Planar Liquid Jet Impingement Cooling of Multiple Discrete Heat Sources
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER
, Vol.
113
, pp.
359
366
.
17.
Sutton, E. P., Evans, G. P., McGuinness, M. D., and Shehla, K. M., 1981, “Influence of Wall Vibrations on a Flow with Boundary-Layer Separation at a Convex Edge,” Unsteady Turbulent Shear Flows, E. Michel et al., eds., IUTAM Symposium, Toulouse, pp. 284–293.
18.
Van Doormaal
J. P.
, and
Raithby
G. D.
,
1984
, “
Enhancements of the SIMPLE Method for Predicting Incompressible Fluid Flows
,”
Num. Heat Transfer
, Vol.
7
, pp.
147
163
.
19.
Ward-Smith, A. J., 1971, “A Unified Treatment of the Flow and Pressure Drop Characteristics of Constrictions Having Orifices With Square Edges,” part 4 in Pressure Losses in Ducted Flows, Butterworths, London.
20.
Womac
D. J.
,
Ramadhyani
S.
, and
Incropera
F. P.
,
1993
, “
Correlating Equations for Impingement Cooling of Small Heat Sources With Single Circular Liquid Jets
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER
, Vol.
115
, pp.
106
115
.
21.
Yakhot
V.
, and
Orszag
S. A.
,
1986
, “
Renormalization Group Analysis of Turbulence, Basic Theory
,”
J. Scientific Computing
, Vol.
1
, pp.
1
51
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.