There is a difference of opinion regarding the relative merits of gas turbines using biomass fuels. Some engineers believe that the internal combustion gas turbine coupled to a gasifier will give a higher efficiency than the externally fired gas turbine using pretreated biomass that is not gasified. Others believe the opposite. In this paper, a comparison between these schemes is made, within the framework of the Brazilian perspective. The exergetic analysis of four cycles is described. The first cycle is externally fired (EFGT), the second uses gasified biomass as fuel (BIG/GT), each of them with a combined cycle as a variant (EFGT/CC and BIG/GTCC). These four are then compared to the natural gas turbine cycles (NGT and NGT/CC) in order to evaluate the thermodynamic cost of using biomass. The comparison is carried out in terms of thermal efficiency and in terms of exergetic efficiency and exergy destruction in the main components. The present analysis shows that the EFGT is quite promising. When compared to the NGT cycle, the EFGT gas turbine shows poor efficiency, though this parameter practically equals that of the BIG/GT cycle. The use of a bottoming steam cycle changes the figures, and the EFGT/CC—due to its higher exhaust temperature—results in high efficiency compared to the BIG/GTCC. Its lower initial and maintenance cost may be an important attraction.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
gas turbines, combustion, bioenergy conversion, thermodynamics, costing, energy resources
Topics:
Biomass, Cycles, Fuels, Gas turbines, Turbines, Exergy, Temperature, Combined cycles
1.
Ferreira, S. B., 1998, Ana´lise das Condic¸o˜es de Operac¸a˜o de Turbinas a Ga´s lindustriais Utilizando Biomassa Gaseificada, M.Sc. thesis (Portuguese), Istituto de Engenharia Meca^nica, Escola Federal de Engenharia Meca^nica, Itajuba´-MG/Brasil.
2.
Mathieu, P., and Pilidis, P., 1991, “The Use of Gaseous Fuels on Aero-Derivative Gas Turbine Engines,” presented at Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, Orlando, FL, June 3–6.
3.
Bridgwater
,
A. V.
,
1995
, “
The Technical and Economic Feasibility of Bjomass Gasification for Power Generation
,”
Fuel
,
74
, No.
5
, pp.
631
–
653
.
4.
Consonni
,
S.
, and
Larson
,
E. D.
,
1996
, “
Biomass-Gasifier/Aeorderivative Gas Turbine Combined Cycles: Part A—Technologies and Performance Modeling
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
118
, pp.
507
–
515
.
5.
Larson, E. D., and Williams, R. H., 1988, “Biomass-Fired Steam-Injected Gas Turbine Cogeneration,” ASME-Cogen Turbo II Proc., G. K. Sevory, and T. H. Fransson, eds., ASME, New York, pp. 57–66.
6.
LaHaye, P. G., and Zabolotny, E., 1989, “Externally-Fired Combined Cycle (EFCC),” ASME-Cogen Turbo Meeting, Nice, France, August 30–September 2, pp. 263–274.
7.
Zabolotny, E. R., Vivenzio, T. A., and LaHaye, P., 1990, “Externally Fired Combined Cycle (EFCC),” American Power Conf., 52nd Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, pp. 23–31.
8.
Consonni, S., and Macchi, E., 1996, “Externally Fired Combined Cycles (EFCC). Part B: Alternative Configurations and Cost Projections,” ASME International Gas Turbine & Aeroderivative Congress & Exhibition, Birmingham, UK, pp. 1–10.
9.
Tsatsaronis
,
G.
,
1993
, “
Thermoeconomic Analysis and Optimization of Energy Systems
,”
Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.
,
19
, pp.
227
–
257
.
10.
Brilliant, H. M., 1995, Second Law Analysis of Present and Future Gas Turbine Engines, 31st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibition, Report AIAA 95-3030, July 10–12, San Diego, CA.
11.
Bejan, A., Tsatsaronis, G., and Moran, M., 1996, Thermal Design and Optimization, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
12.
Moran, M. J., 1982, Availability Analysis: A Guide to Efficient Energy Use, Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
13.
Szargut, J., Morris, D. R., and Stewart, F. R., 1988, Exergy Analysis of Thermal, Chemical and Metallurgical Processes, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York, NY.
14.
Neto, A. C., and Pilidis, P., 1999, “A Comparative Exergy Analysis of Advanced Power Cycles Using Biomass Fuel,” Presented at Int Gas Turbine & Aeroengine Congress & Exhibition, Indianapolis, IN, June 7–10.
Copyright © 2001
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.