A generalized thermodynamic model is developed to describe combined cooling, heating, and power generating systems. This model is based on reversible power generation and refrigeration devices with practical, irreversible heat exchanger processes. It provides information on a system’s performance and allows easy comparisons among different systems at different loading conditions. Using both the first and second laws as well as the carbon dioxide production rate allows one to make a first-order system assessment of its energy usage and environment impact. The consistency of the exergy destruction rate and the first law performance ensures that the thermodynamic system boundaries are correctly and completely defined. The importance of the total thermal load to the required power ratio (HLRP) as a scaling parameter is demonstrated. A number of trends for limited conditions can be delineated even though the reported results confirmed that generalized trends are not identifiable because of the systems’ complexities. The results demonstrate that the combined vapor compression∕absorption refrigeration has higher first law utilization factors and lower carbon dioxide production rate for systems with high refrigeration to total thermal load ratios for all HLRP values. Fuel cell systems outperform engine systems for large refrigeration load applications. An illustration of combining these results to an economic analysis is presented.

1.
Garche
,
J.
, 1998, “
Application of Small Scale Fuel Cells in Combined Heat∕Power Cogeneration
,”
Hydrogen Power: Theoretical and Engineering Solutions, Proceedings of the Hypothesis II Symposium
,
T. O.
Saetre
, ed.,
Kluwer
,
Dordrecht
, pp.
563
574
.
2.
Rosen
,
M. A.
, 1990, “
Comparison Based on Energy and Exergy Analyses of the Potential Cogenration Efficiencies for Fuel Cells and Other Electricity Generation Devices
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
0360-3199,
15
(
4
), pp.
267
274
.
3.
Manning
,
K.
, 1996, “
Opportunity for Cogeneration
,”
ASHRAE J.
0001-2491,
38
(Oct), pp.
57
59
.
4.
Kolanowski
,
B. F.
, 2000,
Small-Scale Cogeneration Handbook
,
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
.
5.
Boyce
,
P. M.
, 2002,
Handbook—for Cogeneration and Combined Cycle Power Plants
,
ASME
,
New York
.
6.
Ryan
,
W.
, 2002, “
Economics of Cogeneration
,”
ASHRAE J.
0001-2491,
44
, pp.
34
39
.
7.
Kowalski
,
G. J.
, and
Zenouzi
,
M.
, 2000, “
Determining Optimal Operating Conditions for a Cogeneration System Using Minimum Entropy Generation Rate and Maximum Performance Criterion for Real and Ideal Cycles
,”
Advanced Energy Systems Division, Proceedings of ASME
,
ASME
,
New York
, ASME Vol.
40
, pp.
591
600
.
8.
Kowalski
,
G. J.
, and
Zenouzi
,
M.
, 2001, “
Comparison of Exergy, Energy Utilization Factors and CO2 CHP Systems Using Fuel Cell And Engine Power Cycles
,”
Determining Off-Design Point Energy and Exergy Performance of CHP Systems of Fuel Cells and Other Electrical Producing Systems, Proceedings of the ASME Advanced Energy Division
, New York,
G. J.
Kowalski
and
M.
Zenouzi
, eds.,
ASME
,
New York
, AES Vol.
1
, Book No. 100520.
9.
Hennefirth
,
J. G.
, and
Todd
,
D. M.
, 1988, “
Cogeneration on a Large Scale
,”
Mech. Eng. (Am. Soc. Mech. Eng.)
0025-6501,
110
, pp.
51
53
.
10.
Luz-Silveria
,
J.
,
Balestieri
,
J. A. P.
,
Santos
,
A. H.
, and
Almeida
,
R. A.
, 1996, “
Thermodynamic Analysis: a Criterion for the Selection of Cogeneration Systems
,”
Proceedings of Advanced Energy Systems Division
,
ASME
,
New York
, AES Vol.
36
, pp.
235
240
.
11.
Fischer
,
S.
, and
Glazer
,
J.
, 2002, “
CHP Self Analysis
,”
ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and R&D Expo
, New Orleans, ASME Paper No. IMECE2002-33345.
12.
Rosen
,
M. A.
, and
Le
,
M. N.
, 1996, “
Thermodynamic Assessment of the Components Comparing an Integrated System for Cogeneration and District Heating and Cooling
,”
Proceedings of Advanced Energy Systems Division
,
ASME
,
New York
, AES Vol.
36
, pp.
473
480
.
13.
Li
,
H.
, 2003, “
Evaluation of A Distributed Energy System Combined with Heating, Cooling and Power Generation Through Multi-criteria Optimization
,”
ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and R&D Expo
, Washington, ASME Paper No. IMECE2003-41458.
14.
Czachorski
,
M.
,
Kelly
,
J
,
Olsen
,
K.
, 2003, “
Heat Recovery From Commercial On-Site Power Generation System: Desiccant Dehumidification vs. Absorption Cooling
,”
2003 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and R&D Expo
, Washington, DC, IMECE2003-42576.
15.
Cruz
,
R. W.
, and
Nebra
,
S. A.
, 2002, “
Thermoeconomic Analysis of a Cogeneration System of Compression Ignition Engine and Absorption Refrigeration Machine
,”
2002 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and R&D Expo
, New Orleans, ASME Paper No. IMEC2002-33182.
16.
Parsons
,
R. A.
, 1993,
ASHRAE Handbook—Fundamentals
,
American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air Conditioning Engineers
,
Atlanta
.
17.
Babcock & Wilcox
, 1963,
Steam its Generation and Use
,
Babcock & Wilcox Co.
,
New York
.
18.
Freni
,
S.
,
Aquino
,
M.
,
Passalacqua
,
E.
, 1992, “
Mass and Energy Blances in a Molten-Carbonate Fuel Cell With Internal Reforming
,”
J. Power Sources
0378-7753,
39
, pp.
203
214
.
19.
Gaggioli
,
R. A.
, and
Dunbar
,
W. R.
, 1993, “
Emf, Maximum Power and Efficiency of Fuel Cells
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
0195-0738,
115
, pp.
100
104
.
20.
Cengel
,
Y. A.
, and
Boles
,
M. A.
, 1998,
Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach
,
WCB∕McGraw-Hill
,
Boston
.
21.
Bejan
,
A.
, 1982, “
Second-Law Analysis in Heat Transfer and Thermal Design
,”
Adv. Heat Transfer
0065-2717,
15
, pp.
1
58
.
22.
Bejan
,
A.
, 1996, “
Entropy Generation Minimization: The New Thermodynamics of Finite-Time Processes
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
0021-8979,
79
(
3
), pp.
1191
1218
.
23.
Bejan
,
A.
, 1995, “
Theory of Heat Transfer-Irreversible Power Plants-II. The Optimal Allocation of Heat Exchange Equipment
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
0017-9310,
38
(
3
), pp.
433
444
.
24.
Masters
,
G. M.
, 2004,
Renewable and Efficient Electric Power Systems
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
You do not currently have access to this content.