This paper presents energy end-use model of the U.S. Chemical Industry. The model allocates combustible fuel and renewable energy inputs among generic end-uses including intermediate conversions through on-site power and steam generation. The results of this model provide the basis to scale energy process-step models. The main federal database to construct energy end-use models is Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey of the U.S. Energy Information Administration. This database provides information on how much energy is used for each end-use on a national scale in each industry. The secondary federal database to construct the energy end-use models is the Energy Information Administration’s “EIA-860B: Annual Electric Generator Report.” This database provides information about fuel consumed, gross generation, and recovered waste heat at the prime mover level of detail. The results of the model show that the majority of the fuel input is used directly for the end-uses. Although the rest of the fuel is used to generate steam and power, most of this energy contributes to the end-uses as steam. Therefore, the purpose of fuel consumption at nonutility plants is to run their end-uses. During the course of this study, the most recent U.S. federal energy database available was for the year 1998. Currently, the most recent available U.S. federal energy database is given for the year 2002 based on the data collected from 15,500 establishments.

1.
Energy Information Administration (EIA)
, 2004, Chemical Industry Briefs: Energy Consumption, retrieved from http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/mecs/iab98/chemicals/energy_use.htmlhttp://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/mecs/iab98/chemicals/energy_use.html.
2.
Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey (MECS)
, Table N3.2 Fuel Consumption, retrieved from http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/mecs/mecs98/datatables/d98n3_2.htmhttp://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/mecs/mecs98/datatables/d98n3_2.htm.
3.
Energy Information Administration (EIA)
, EIA Database, Energy Consumption: Energy Consumption by Fuel, retrieved from http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/mecs/iab98/chemicals/fuel.htmlhttp://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/mecs/iab98/chemicals/fuel.html.
4.
Energy Information Administration (EIA)
, EIA Natural Gas Navigator, retrieved from http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/ng/ng_cons_acct_dcu_nus_a.htmhttp://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/ng/ng_cons_acct_dcu_nus_a.htm.
5.
The North American Industrial Classification Systems (NAICS)
, retrieved from the U.S. Census Bureau Website at http://www.census.gov/epcd/www/naics.htmlhttp://www.census.gov/epcd/www/naics.html.
6.
Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey (MECS)
, MECS Glossary, retrieved from http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/efficiency/mecs_glossary.htmhttp://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/efficiency/mecs_glossary.htm.
7.
Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey (MECS)
, MECS Data Tables, retrieved from http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/mecs/http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/mecs/.
8.
Energy Information Administration (EIA)
, EIA 860B: Annual Electric Generator—Non Utility Database, retrieved from http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/page/eia860b.htmlhttp://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/page/eia860b.html.
9.
Worrell
,
E.
,
Price
,
L
.,
Martin
,
N
.,
Hendriks
,
C
., and
Meida
,
L. O.
, 2001, “
Carbon Dioxide Emissions From the Global Cement Industry
,”
Annu. Rev. Energy Environ.
1056-3466,
26
, pp.
303
329
.
10.
Energy Information Administration (EIA)
, 1995, “
Energy Consumption Series: Measuring Energy Efficiency in the United States’ Economy: A Beginning
,” Reference No. DOE/EIA-0555(95)/2.
11.
Feder
,
D.
, 2004, “
A Regionally Based Energy End-Use Strategy: Case Studies From Centre County Pennsylvania
,”
Profess. Geograph.
0033-0124,
56
(
2
), pp.
185
200
.
12.
Andersen
,
J. P.
, and
Hyman
,
B.
, 2001, “
Energy and Material Flow Models for the US Steel Industry
,”
Energy
0360-5442,
26
, pp.
137
159
.
13.
Hyman
,
B.
, and
Reed
,
T.
, 1995, “
Energy Intensity of Manufacturing Processes
,”
Energy
0360-5442,
20
, pp.
593
606
.
14.
Worrell
E.
,
Phylipsen
D.
,
Einstein
D.
, and
Martin
N. ,
2000, “
Energy Use and Energy Intensity of the U.S. Chemical Industry
,” Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-44314.
15.
Patel
,
M.
, 2003, “
Cumulative Energy Demand (CED) and Cumulative CO2 Emissions for Products of the Organic Chemical Industry
,”
Energy
0360-5442,
28
, pp.
721
740
.
16.
Ayres
,
R.
,
Ayres
,
L. W.
, and
Warr
,
B.
, 2003, “
Exergy, Power and Work in the U.S. Economy 1900–1998
,”
Energy
0360-5442,
28
, pp.
219
273
.
17.
Ertesvag
,
I. S.
, and
Mielnik
,
M.
, 2000, “
Exergy Analysis of Norwegian Society
,
Energy
0360-5442,
25
, pp.
957
973
.
18.
Ozalp N., and Hyman B., 2006, “
Calibrated Models of On-Site Power and Steam Production in U.S. Manufacturing Industries
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
1359-4311,
26
, pp.
530
539
.
19.
Ozalp
,
N.
, and
Hyman
,
B.
, 2006, “
Energy End-Use Model of Paper Manufacturing in the U.S.
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
1359-4311,
26
, pp.
540
548
.
20.
Ozalp
,
N.
, and
Hyman
,
B.
, 2007, “
Allocation of Energy Inputs Among the End-Uses in the U.S. Petroleum and Coal Products Industry
,”
Energy
0360-5442,
32
, pp.
1460
1470
.
21.
Giraldo
,
L.
, and
Hyman
,
B.
, 1995, “
Energy End-Use Models for Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard Mills
,”
Energy
0360-5442,
20
, pp.
1005
1019
.
22.
Arthur D. Little, Inc. (ADL)
, 2000 “
Overview of Energy Flow for Industries in Standard Industrial Classifications
,” U.S. Department of Energy Office of Industrial Technology, Report No. DOE/OIT-71563.
23.
Department of Energy (DOE)
, 2004, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE): Energy Use and Loss Footprints, retrieved from http://www.eere.energy.gov/industry/energy_systems/footprints.htmlhttp://www.eere.energy.gov/industry/energy_systems/footprints.html.
24.
Bhatt
,
S. M.
, 2000, “
Energy Audit Case Studies I—Steam Systems
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
1359-4311,
20
, pp.
285
296
.
25.
Petek
,
J.
, and
Glavic
,
P.
, 1996, “
An Integral Approach to Waste Minimization in Process Industries
,”
Resour. Conserv. Recycl.
0921-3449,
17
(
3
), pp.
169
188
.
26.
McKay
,
G.
and
Holland
,
C. R.
, 1981, “
Energy Savings From Steam Losses on an Oil Refinery
,”
Engineering Costs and Production Economics
,”
5
, pp.
193
203
.
You do not currently have access to this content.