This paper gives a representative energy process-step model of hydrogen production in the U.S. Chemical Industry based on federal data. There have been prior efforts to create energy process-step models for other industries. However, among all manufacturing industries, creating energy flow models for the U.S. Chemical Industry is the most challenging one due to the complexity of this industry. This paper gives concise comparison of earlier studies and provides thorough description of the methodology to develop energy process-step model for hydrogen production in the U.S. Chemical Industry. Results of the energy process-step model of hydrogen production in the U.S. Chemical Industry show that steam allocations among the end-uses are 68% to process cooling (steam injection to product combustion gases), 25% to process heating, and 7% to other process use (CO2 converter). The model also shows that the major energy consuming step in hydrogen production is the reformer, which consumes approximately 16 Peta Joules (PJ) fuels. During the course of this study, the most recent U.S. federal energy database available was for the year 1998. Currently, the most recent available U.S. federal energy database is given for the year 2002 based on the data collected from 15,500 establishments.

1.
Brown
,
H. L.
,
Hamel
,
B. B.
, and
Hedman
,
B. A.
, 1996,
Energy Analysis of 108 Industrial Processes
,
Fairmont
,
Atlanta, GA
.
2.
Worrell
,
E.
,
Phylipsen
,
D.
,
Einstein
,
D.
, and
Martin
,
N.
, 2000, “
Energy Use and Energy Intensity of the U.S. Chemical Industry
,” Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-44314.
3.
Wang
,
M.
,
Lee
,
H.
, and
Molburg
,
J.
, 2004, “
Allocation of Energy Use in Petroleum Refineries to Petroleum Products: Implications for Life-Cycle Energy Use and Emission Inventory of Petroleum Transportation Fuels
,”
International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
,
9
(
1
), pp.
34
44
.
4.
Arthur D. Little, Inc. (ADL)
, 2000, “
Overview of Energy Flow for Industries in Standard Industrial Classifications
,” U.S. Department of Energy Office of Industrial Technology, Report No. DOE/OIT-71563.
5.
Giraldo
,
L.
, and
Hyman
,
B.
, 1996, “
An Energy Process-Step Model for Manufacturing Paper and Paperboard
,”
Energy
0360-5442,
21
(
7-8
), pp.
667
681
.
6.
Andersen
,
J. P.
, and
Hyman
,
B.
, 2001, “
Energy and Material Flow Models for the US Steel Industry
,”
Energy
0360-5442,
26
, pp.
137
159
.
7.
Ozalp
,
N.
, and
Hyman
,
B.
, 2006, “
Energy End-Use Model of Paper Manufacturing in the U.S.
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
1359-4311,
26
, pp.
540
548
.
8.
Ozalp
,
N.
, and
Hyman
,
B.
, 2007, “
Allocation of Energy Inputs Among the End-Uses in the U.S. Petroleum and Coal Products Industry
,”
Energy
0360-5442,
32
, pp.
1460
1470
.
9.
U. S. Chemical Industry subsectors according to the North American Industrial Classification Systems (NAICS), retrieved from the U.S. Census Bureau website at http://www.census.gov/epcd/ec97/industry/E325.HTMhttp://www.census.gov/epcd/ec97/industry/E325.HTM.
10.
Department of Commerce (DOC)
, 1997, Industry economic accounts, benchmark input-output data, retrieved from http://www.bea.gov/bea/dn2/i-o_benchmark_1997.htmhttp://www.bea.gov/bea/dn2/i-o_benchmark_1997.htm.
11.
Padró
,
C. E. G.
, and
Keller
,
J. O.
, 2005, “
Hydrogen Energy
,”
Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology
,
John Wiley and Sons
,
New York
.
12.
Muradov
,
N. Z.
, and
Veziroglu
,
T. N.
, 2005, “
From Hydrocarbon to Hydrogen-Carbon to Hydrogen Economy
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
0360-3199,
30
, pp.
225
237
.
13.
Baade
,
W. F.
,
Parekh
,
U. N.
, and
Raman
,
V. S.
, 2001, “
Hydrogen
,”
Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology
,
John Wiley and Sons
,
New York
.
14.
Häussinger
,
P.
,
Lohmüller
,
R.
, and
Watson
,
A. M.
, 2000, “
Hydrogen
,”
Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry
,
Wiley-VCH GmbH & Co.
,
Weinheim, Germany
.
15.
Shreve
,
R. N.
, and
Brink
,
J. A.
, 1984,
Shreve’s Chemical Process Industries
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
16.
Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey (MECS) by the Energy Information Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy, retrieved from http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/mecs/http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/mecs/.
17.
Ozalp
,
N.
, and
Hyman
,
B.
, “
Methodological Issues With Using the U.S. National Databases
,” unpublished.
18.
Bhatt
,
M. S.
, 2000, “
Energy Audit Case Studies I-Steam Systems
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
1359-4311,
20
, pp.
285
296
.
19.
Petek
,
J.
, and
Glavic
,
P.
, 1996, “
An Integral Approach to Waste Minimization in Process Industries
,”
Resour. Conserv. Recycl.
0921-3449,
17
(
3
), pp.
169
188
.
20.
McKay
,
G.
, and
Holland
,
C. R.
, 1981, “
Energy Savings From Steam Losses on an Oil Refinery
,”
Eng. Costs Prod. Econ.
,
5
, pp.
193
203
. 0167-188X
21.
Energy Information Administration (EIA) 860B Database: Annual Electric Generator-Nonutility, retrieved from http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/page/eia860b.htmlhttp://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/page/eia860b.html.
22.
Ozalp
,
N.
, and
Hyman
,
B.
, 2006, “
Calibrated Models of On-Site Power and Steam Production in U.S. Manufacturing Industries
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
1359-4311,
26
, pp.
530
539
.
23.
Ozalp
,
N.
, 2005, “
Energy, Material and Emissions Flow Models of the U.S. Chemical Industry
,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
24.
U.S. Census Bureau Current Industrial Reports (CIR)
, 1998, “
Industrial Gases
,” Reference No. MA325C(98)-1.
You do not currently have access to this content.