The flowfield around a 6:1 prolate spheroid at angle of attack is predicted using solutions of the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations and detached-eddy simulation (DES). The calculations were performed at a Reynolds number of 4.2×106, the flow is tripped at x/L=0.2, and the angle of attack α is varied from 10 to 20 deg. RANS calculations are performed using the Spalart-Allmaras one-equation model. The influence of corrections to the Spalart-Allmaras model accounting for streamline curvature and a nonlinear constitutive relation are also considered. DES predictions are evaluated against experimental measurements, RANS results, as well as calculations performed without an explicit turbulence model. In general, flowfield predictions of the mean properties from the RANS and DES are similar. Predictions of the axial pressure distribution along the symmetry plane agree well with measured values for 10 deg angle of attack. Changes in the separation characteristics in the aft region alter the axial pressure gradient as the angle of attack increases to 20 deg. With downstream evolution, the wall-flow turning angle becomes more positive, an effect also predicted by the models though the peak-to-peak variation is less than that measured. Azimuthal skin friction variations show the same general trend as the measurements, with a weak minima identifying separation. Corrections for streamline curvature improve prediction of the pressure coefficient in the separated region on the leeward side of the spheroid. While initiated further along the spheroid compared to experimental measurements, predictions of primary and secondary separation agree reasonably well with measured values. Calculations without an explicit turbulence model predict pressure and skin-friction distributions in substantial disagreement with measurements.

1.
Tsai, C.-Y., and Whitney, A. K., 1999, “Numerical Study of Three-Dimensional Flow Separation for a 6:1 Ellipsoid,” AIAA Paper No. 99-0172.
2.
Rhee
,
S. H.
, and
Hino
,
T.
,
2000
, “
Computational Investigation of 3D Turbulent Flow Separation Around a Spheroid Using an Unstructured Grid Method
,”
J. Soc. Nav. Arch. Jpn.
,
188
, pp.
1
9
.
3.
Alin, N., Berglund, M., and Fureby, C., 2000, “A VLES Approach Applied to Flows Around Underwater Vehicle Hulls,” AIAA Paper No. 00-0543.
4.
Hedin, P.-O., Berglund, M., Alin, N., and Fureby, C., 2001, “Large Eddy Simulation of the Flow Around an Inclined Prolate Spheroid,” AIAA Paper No. 2001-1035.
5.
Spalart
,
P. R.
,
2000
, “
Strategies for Turbulence Modeling and Simulations
,”
International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow
,
21
, pp.
252
263
.
6.
Spalart, P. R., Jou, W. H., Strelets, M., and Allmaras, S. R., 1997, “Comments on the Feasibility of LES for Wings, and on a Hybrid RANS/LES Approach,” First AFOSR International Conference on DNS/LES, Ruston, LA.
7.
Shur, M., Spalart, P. R., Strelets, M., and Travin, A., 1999, “Detached-Eddy Simulation of an Airfoil at High Angle of Attack,” 4th Int. Symp. Eng. Turb. Modelling and Measurements, Corsica, May 24–26.
8.
Travin
,
A.
,
Shur
,
M.
,
Strelets
,
M.
, and
Spalart
,
P. R.
,
2000
, “
Detached-Eddy Simulations Past a Circular Cylinder
,”
Flow, Turbul. Combust.
,
63
, pp.
293
313
.
9.
Constantinescu, G. S., and Squires, K. D., 2000, “LES and DES Investigations of Turbulent Flow Over a Sphere,” AIAA Paper No. 2000–0540.
10.
Strelets, M., 2001, “Detached Eddy Simulation of Massively Separated Flows,” AIAA Paper No. 01-0879.
11.
Chesnakas
,
C. J.
, and
Simpson
,
R. L.
,
1997
, “
Detailed Investigation of the Three-Dimensional Separation About a 6:1 Prolate Spheroid
,”
AIAA J.
,
35
(
6
), pp.
990
999
.
12.
Wetzel
,
T. G.
,
Simpson
,
R. L.
, and
Chesnakas
,
C. J.
,
1998
, “
Measurement of Three-Dimensional Crossflow Separation
,”
AIAA J.
,
36
(
4
), pp.
557
564
.
13.
Spalart
,
P. R.
, and
Allmaras
,
S. R.
,
1994
, “
A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows
,”
Rech. Aerosp.
,
1
, pp.
5
21
.
14.
Spalart
,
P. R.
, and
Shur
,
M.
,
1997
, “
On the Sensitization of Simple Turbulence Models to Rotation and Curvature
,”
Aerosp. Sci. Technol.
,
1
(
5
), pp.
297
302
.
15.
Arnone
,
A.
,
Liou
,
M. S.
, and
Povinelli
,
L. A.
,
1995
, “
Integration of the Navier-Stokes Equations Using Dual Time Stepping and a Multigrid Method
,”
AIAA J.
,
33
(
6
), pp.
985
990
.
16.
Johnson
,
T. A.
, and
Patel
,
V. C.
,
1999
, “
Flow Past a Sphere up to a Reynolds Number of 300
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
378
(
1
), pp.
19
70
.
17.
Gottlieb
,
J. J.
, and
Groth
,
C. P. T.
,
1988
, “
Assessment of Riemann Solvers for Unsteady One-Dimensional Inviscid Flows of Perfect Gases
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
,
78
, pp.
437
458
.
18.
Karypis, G., Schloegel, K., and Kumar, V., 1997, “ParMETIS: Parallel Graph Partitioning and Sparse Matrix Ordering Library Version 1.0,” Department of Computer Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
19.
Grismer
,
M. J.
,
Strang
,
W. Z.
,
Tomaro
,
R. F.
, and
Witzemman
,
F. C.
,
1998
, “
Cobalt: A Parallel, Implicit, Unstructured Euler/Navier-Stokes Solver
,”
Adv. Eng. Software
,
29
, pp.
365
373
.
20.
Hsu
,
K.
, and
Lee
,
S. L.
,
1991
, “
A Numerical Technique for Two-Dimensional Grid Generation With Grid Control at all of the Boundaries
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
,
11
, pp.
451
469
.
21.
Fu
,
T. C.
,
Shekarriz
,
A.
,
Katz
,
J.
, and
Huang
,
T. T.
, “
The Flow Structure in the Lee of an Inclined 6: Prolate Spheroid
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
269
, pp.
79
106
.
22.
Speziale
,
C. G.
,
1987
, “
On the Non-linear K-l and K-ε Models of Turbulence
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
178
, p.
459
459
.
23.
Tamura
,
T.
, and
Kuwahara
,
K.
,
1990
, “
On the Reliability of Two-Dimensional Simulation for Unsteady Flows Around Cylinder-Type Structure
,”
J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
,
35
, pp.
275
298
.
24.
Boris
,
J. P.
,
Grinstein
,
F. F.
,
Oran
,
E. S.
, and
Kolbe
,
R. L.
,
1992
, “
New Insights into Large Eddy Simulation
,”
Fluid Dyn. Res.
,
10
, pp.
199
228
.
25.
Fureby
,
C.
, and
Grinstein
,
F. F.
,
1999
, “
Monotonically Integrated Large Eddy Simulation of Free Shear Flows
,”
AIAA J.
,
37
, pp.
544
556
.
You do not currently have access to this content.