The optimum geometries of the ejectors, which give maximum efficiency, are numerically predicted and experimentally measured. The numerical investigation is based on flow equations governing turbulent, compressible, two-dimensional, steady, time averaged, and boundary layer equations. These equations are iteratively solved using finite-difference method under the conditions of different flow regimes, which can be divided into several distinctive regions where the methods for estimating the mixing length are different for each flow region. The first region depicts the wall boundary layer, jet shear layer, and secondary and primary potential flows. The second one contains a single region of developing flow. A simple ejector with convergent-divergent primary nozzle was fabricated and experimentally tested. The present theoretical and experimental results are well compared with published data. The results obtained are used to correlate the optimum ejector geometry, pressure ratio, and ejector optimum efficiency as functions of the operation parameters and ejector area ratio. The resultant correlations help us to select the optimum ejector geometry and its corresponding maximum efficiency for particular operating conditions.

1.
Donald
,
P. H.
, and
Robert
,
W. C.
, 1956, “
Investigation at Supersonic and Subsonic Mach Numbers of Auxiliary Inlets Supplying Secondary Air Flow to Ejector Exhaust Nozzles
,” NACA RM E55J12a.
2.
Fabri
,
J.
, and
Paulon
,
J.
, 1958, “
Theory and Experiments on Supersonic Air-to-Air Ejectors
,” NACA TM-1410.
3.
Kirti
,
N. G.
,
Torda
,
T. P.
, and
Zalman
,
L.
, 1970, “
Turbulent Mixing in the Initial Region of Heterogeneous Axisymmetric Coaxial Confined Jets
,” NASA CR-1615.
4.
Abou-Taleb
,
F. A.
, 1986, “
Effect of Geometric Parameters on the Performance of Ejectors
,” M.Sc. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Menoufia University, Egypt.
5.
Dutton
,
J. C.
, and
Carroll
,
B. F.
, 1986, “
Optimal Supersonic Ejector Design
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
108
, pp.
414
420
.
6.
Raman
,
G.
, and
Taghavi
,
R.
, 1997, “
Aeroacoustic Characteristics of a Rectangular Multi-Element Supersonic Jet Mixer-Ejector Nozzle
,”
J. Sound Vib.
0022-460X,
207
(
2
), pp.
227
247
.
7.
Guillaume
,
D. W.
, and
Judge
,
T. A.
, 1999, “
Improving the Efficiency of a Jet Pump Using an Elliptical Nozzle
,”
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
0034-6748,
70
(
12
), pp.
4727
4729
.
8.
Szabo
,
S.
, 2001, “
Influence of the Material Quality of Primary Gas Jets on the Final Vacuum Created by a Supersonic Gas Ejector
,”
Computational Applied Mechanics
,
2
(
1
), pp.
131
144
.
9.
Kandakure
,
M. T.
,
Gaikar
,
V. G.
, and
Patwardhan
,
A. W.
, 2005, “
Hydrodynamic Aspects of Ejectors
,”
Chem. Eng. Sci.
0009-2509,
60
, pp.
6391
6402
.
10.
Karambirov
,
S. N.
, and
Chebaevskii
,
V. F.
, 2005, “
Possibilities of Improving Ejector Pump Characteristics
,”
Chemical Petroleum Engineering
,
41
(
1–2
), pp.
75
80
.
11.
Yong
,
F.
,
Yuji
,
S.
, and
Nobuhide
,
K.
, 2006, “
Development of a Large-Entrainment-Ratio Axisymmetric Supersonic Ejector for Micro Butane Combustor
,”
J. Micromech. Microeng.
0960-1317,
16
, pp.
S211
S219
.
12.
Krause
,
E.
, 1972, “
Numerical Treatment of Boundary-Layer and Navier–Stokes Equations
,”
VKI Lecture Series, Numerical Methods in Fluid Mechanics
, Feb. 7–11.
13.
Hedges
,
K. R.
, and
Hill
,
P. G.
, 1974, “
Compressible Flow Ejectors
,”
ASME Trans. J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
96
, pp.
272
281
.
14.
Schlichting
,
H.
, 1968,
Boundary Layer Theory
,
McGraw-Hill Book, Inc.
,
New York
.
15.
Hewedy
,
N. I. I.
,
Hamed
,
M. H.
,
Abou-Taleb
,
F. Sh.
, and
Ghonim
,
T. A.
, 2007, “
Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Compressible Flow Ejectors
,”
Minoufiya Engineering Research Journal
,
30
(
1
), pp.
53
66
.
You do not currently have access to this content.