The slipstream of a high-speed train was investigated using large-eddy simulation (LES). The subgrid stresses were modeled using the standard Smagorinsky model. The train model consisted of a four-coach of a 1/25 scale of the ICE2 train. The model was attached to a 3.61 m diameter rotating rig. The LES was made at two Reynolds numbers of 77,000 and 94,000 based on the height of the train and its speed. Three different computational meshes were used in the simulations: course, medium and fine. The coarse, medium, and fine meshes consisted of 6×106, 10×106, and 15×106 nodes, respectively. The results of the fine mesh are in fairly agreement with the experimental data. Different flow regions were obtained using the LES: upstream region, nose region, boundary layer region, intercarriage gap region, tail region, and wake region. Localized velocity peak was obtained near the nose of the train. The maximum and minimum pressure values are also noticed near to the nose tip. Coherent structures were born at the nose and roof of the train. These structures were swept by the radial component of the velocity toward the outer side of the train. These structures extended for a long distance behind the train in the far wake flow. The intercarriage gaps and the underbody complexities, in the form of supporting cylinders, were shown to have large influences on the slipstream velocity. The results showed that the slipstream velocity is linearly proportional to the speed of the train in the range of our moderate Reynolds numbers.

1.
Pope
,
C.
, 2006, “
Safety of Slipstreams Effects Produced by Trains
,” A Report Prepared by Mott Macdonald, Ltd., for RSSB.
2.
RSSB
, 2006, “
Slipstream Risks: Phase 1 (a) Commentary on Existing GB Position
,” http://www.rssb.co.uk/http://www.rssb.co.uk/
3.
Figura-Hary
,
G. I.
, 2007, RSSB Slipstream Safety Analysis of Existing Experimental Data on Train Slipstreams Including the Effects on Pushchairs.
4.
Sterling
,
M.
,
Baker
,
C. J.
,
Jordan
,
S. C.
, and
Johnson
,
T.
, 2008, “
A Study of the Slipstreams of High-Speed Passenger Trains and Freight Trains
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., F J. Rail Rapid Transit
0954-4097,
222
, pp.
177
193
.
5.
Baker
,
C. J.
,
Dalley
,
S. J.
,
Johnson
,
T.
,
Quinn
,
A.
, and
Wright
,
N. G.
, 2001, “
The Slipstream and Wake of a High Speed Train
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., F J. Rail Rapid Transit
0954-4097,
215
, pp.
83
99
.
6.
Gil
,
N.
,
Baker
,
C. J.
, and
Roberts
,
C.
, 2008, “
The Measurement of Train Slipstream Characteristics Using a Rotating Rail Rig
,”
BBAA VI International Colloquium on Bluff Bodies Aerodynamics and Applications
, Milan, Italy.
7.
Raghunathan
,
R. S.
,
Kim
,
H. -D.
, and
Setoguchi
,
T.
, 2002, “
Aerodynamics of High-Speed Railway Train
,”
Prog. Aerosp. Sci.
0376-0421,
38
, pp.
469
514
.
8.
Andersson
,
E.
,
Haggstrom
,
J.
,
Sima
,
M.
, and
Stichel
,
S.
, 2004, “
Assessment of Train-Overturning Risk due to Strong Cross-Wind
,”
Proc. Inst., Mech. Eng., F J. Rail Rapid Transit
,
218
, pp.
213
223
. 0002-7820
9.
Orellano
,
A.
, and
Schober
,
M.
, 2006, “
Aerodynamic Performance of a Typical High-Speed Train
,” WSEAS Transactions on Fluid Mechanics, Vol.
1
.
10.
Holmes
,
S.
,
Schroeder
,
M.
, and
Toma
,
E.
, 2000, “
High-Speed Passenger and Intercity Train Aerodynamic Computer Modelling
,”
The 2000 International Mechanical Engineering Congress (ME2000)
.
11.
Robert
,
A.
, and
Harvey
,
S. L.
, 2002, “
Measurement of the Aerodynamic Pressures Produced by Passing Trains
,”
Proceedings of the 2002 ASME/IEEE Joint Rail Conference
.
12.
Bocciolone
,
M.
,
Cheli
,
F.
,
Corradi
,
R.
,
Muggiasca
,
S.
, and
Tomasini
,
G.
, 2008, “
Crosswind Action on Rail Vehicles: Wind Tunnel Experimental Analyses
,”
J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
,
96
, pp.
584
610
.
13.
Muld
,
T.
,
Efraimsson
,
G.
,
Henningson
,
D.
,
Herbst
,
A.
, and
Orellano
,
A.
, 2009, “
Detached Eddy Simulation and Validation on the Aerodynamic Train Model
,”
EUROMECH Colloquium
, Berlin, Germany, March 24–25.
14.
Hemida
,
H.
, and
Krajnovic
,
S.
, 2009, “
Exploring Flow Structures Around a Simplified ICE2 Train Subjected to a 30° Side Wind Using LES
,”
Eng. Appl. of Comp. Fluid Mech.
,
3
(
1
), pp.
28
41
.
15.
Hemida
,
H.
, and
Krajnovic
,
S.
, 2008, “
LES Study of the Influence of a Train Nose Shape on the Flow Structures Under Cross-Wind Conditions
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
130
(
9
), p.
091101
.
16.
Hemida
,
H.
, and
Krajnovic
,
S.
, 2010, “
LES Study of the Influence of Yaw Angles and Nose Shape on Flow Structures Around Trains
,”
J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
,
98
(
1
), pp.
34
46
.
18.
Bradshaw
,
P.
, 1973, “
Effects of Streamline Curvature on Turbulent Flow
,” Agardograph 169.
19.
Kim
,
N.
, and
Rhode
,
D. L.
, 2000, “
Streamwise Curvature Effect on the Incompressible Turbulent Mean Velocity Over Curved Surfaces
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
122
, pp.
547
551
.
20.
Jeong
,
J.
, and
Hussain
,
F.
, 1995, “
On the Identification of the Vortex
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
285
, pp.
69
94
.
You do not currently have access to this content.