It is well known that lean premixed combustion systems potentially offer better emissions performance than conventional non-premixed designs. However, premixed combustion systems are more susceptible to combustion instabilities than non-premixed systems. Combustion instabilities (large-scale oscillations in heat release and pressure) have a deleterious effect on equipment, and also tend to decrease combustion efficiency. Designing out combustion instabilities is a difficult process and, particularly if many large-scale experiments are required, also very costly. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is now an established design tool in many areas of gas turbine design. However, its accuracy in the prediction of combustion instabilities is not yet proven. Unsteady heat release will generally be coupled to unsteady flow conditions within the combustor. In principle, computational fluid dynamics should be capable of modeling this coupled process. The present work assesses the ability of CFD to model self-excited combustion instabilities occurring within a model combustor. The accuracy of CFD in predicting both the onset and the nature of the instability is reported.

1.
Smith, C. E., and Leonard, A. D., 1997, “CFD Modelling of Combustion Instability in Premixed Axisymmetric Combustors,” ASME Paper No. 97-GT-305.
2.
Steele, R. C., Cowell, L. H., Cannon, S. M., and Smith, C. E., 1999, “Passive Control of Combustion Instability in Lean Premixed Combustors,” ASME Paper No. 99-GT-052.
3.
Brookes, S. J., Cant, R. S., and Dowling, A. P., “Modelling Combustion Instabilities Using Computational Fluid Dynamics,” ASME Paper No. 99-GT-112.
4.
Menon
,
S.
, and
Jou
,
W-H.
,
1991
, “
Large-Eddy Simulation of Combustion Instability in and Axisymmetric Ramjet Combustor
,”
Combust. Sci. Technol.
,
75
, pp.
53
72
.
5.
Mo¨ller, S. I., Lundgren, E., and Fureby, C., 1996, “Large Eddy Simulation of Unsteady Combustion,” 26th Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, pp. 241–248.
6.
Murota, T., and Ohtsuka, M., 1999, “Large-Eddy Simulation of Combustion Oscillation in the Premixed Combustor,” ASME Paper No. 99-GT-274.
7.
Dowling
,
A. P.
,
1999
, “
A Kinematic Model of a Ducted Flame
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
394
, pp.
51
72
.
8.
Langhorne
,
P. J.
,
1988
, “
Reheat Buzz: An Acoustically Coupled Combustion Instability. Part I: Experiment
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
193
, pp.
417
443
.
9.
Cant
,
R. S.
, and
Bray
,
K. N. C.
,
1989
, “
A Theoretical Model of Premixed Turbulent Combustion in Closed Vessels
,”
Combust. Flame
,
76
, pp.
243
263
.
10.
Abu-Orf, G. M., and Cant, R. S., 1996, “Reaction Rate Modelling for Premixed Turbulent Methane-Air Flames,” Proc. Joint Meeting of the Portuguese, British, Spanish and Swedish Sections of the Combustion Institute, Madeira.
11.
Cant
,
R. S.
,
Bray
,
K. N. C.
,
Kostiuk
,
L. W.
, and
Rogg
,
B.
,
1994
, “
Flow Divergence Effects in Strained Laminar Flamelets for Premixed Turbulent Combustion
,”
Combust. Sci. Technol.
,
95
, pp.
261
276
.
12.
Bray
,
K. N. C.
, and
Cant
,
R. S.
,
1991
, “
Some Applications of Kolmogorov’s Turbulence Research in the Field of Combustion
,”
Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond.
,
A434
, pp.
217
240
.
13.
Cheng
,
R. K.
, and
Shepherd
,
I. G.
,
1991
, “
The Influence of Burner Geometry on Premixed Turbulent Flame Propagation
,”
Combust. Flame
,
85
, pp.
7
26
.
14.
Watkins, A. P., Li, S-P., and Cant, R. S., 1996, “Premixed Combustion Modelling for Spark Ignition Engine Applications,” Society of Automotive Engineers, SAE Paper No. 961190.
15.
Gaskell
,
P. H.
, and
Lau
,
A. K. C.
,
1988
, “
Curvature-Compensated Convective Transport: SMART. A New Boundedness-Preserving Transport Algorithm
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
,
8
, pp.
617
641
.
16.
Issa
,
R. I.
,
1986
, “
Solution of the Implicitly Discretised Fluid Flow Equations by Operator Splitting
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
,
62
, pp.
40
65
.
You do not currently have access to this content.