With deregulation in the power generation market and a need for flexibility in terms of power augmentation during the periods of high electricity demand, power plant operators all over the world are exploring means to augment power from both the existing and new gas turbines. An approach becoming increasingly popular is that of the high pressure inlet fogging. In this paper, the results of a comprehensive parametric analysis on the effects of inlet fogging on a wide range of existing gas turbines are presented. Both evaporative and overspray fogging conditions have been analyzed. The results show that the performance parameters indicative of inlet fogging effects have a definitive correlation with the key gas turbine design parameters. In addition, this study indicates that the aeroderivative gas turbines, in comparison to the heavy-duty industrial machines, have higher performance improvement due to inlet fogging effects. Plausible reasons for the observed trends are discussed. This paper represents the first systematic study on the effects of inlet fogging for a large number (a total of 67) of gas turbines available from the major gas turbine manufacturers.

Issue Section:
Gas Turbines: Industrial and Cogeneration
Keywords:
gas turbines, electricity supply industry deregulation
Topics:
Gas turbines, Temperature
1.
Tawney, R., Pearson, C., and Brown, M., 2001, “Options to Maximize Power Output for Merchant Plants in Combined Cycle Applications,” ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-0409.
2.
Jones, C., and Jacobs, J. A., 2000, “Economics and Technical Considerations for Combined-Cycle Performance-Enhancement Options,” GE Publication GER-4200.
3.
Kitchen, B. J., and Ebeling, J. A., 1995, “Qualifying Combustion Turbines for Inlet Air Cooling Capacity Enhancement,” ASME Paper No. 95-GT-266.
4.
Meher-Homji, C. B., and Mee, T. R., 1999, “Gas Turbine Power Augmentation by Fogging of Inlet Air,” Proceedings of the 28th Turbomachinery Symposium, Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M University, Sept., Houston, TX.
5.
Meher-Homji, C. B., and Mee, T. R., 2000, “Inlet Fogging of Gas Turbine Engines–Part A: Theory, Psychrometrics and Fog Generation and Part B: Prac-tical Considerations, Control and O&M Aspects,” ASME Paper Nos. 2000-GT-307; 2000-GT-308.
6.
Kleinschmidt
,
R. V.
,
1947
, “
Value of Wet Compression in Gas Turbine Cycles
,”
Mech. Eng. (Am. Soc. Mech. Eng.)
,
69
, pp.
115
–
116
.
7.
Wilcox, E. C., and Trout, A. M., 1951, “Analysis of Thrust Augmentation of Turbojet Engines by Water Injection at Compressor Inlet Including Charts for Calculating Compression Processes with Water Injection,” NACA Report No. 1006.
8.
Nolan, J. P., and Twombly, V. J., 1990, “Gas Turbine Performance Improvement by Direct Mixing Evaporative Cooling System,” ASME Paper No. 90-GT-368.
9.
Hill
,
P. G.
,
1963
, “
Aerodynamic and Thermodynamic Effects of Coolant Injection on Axial Compressors
,”
Aeronaut. J.
pp.
331
–
348
.
10.
Arsen’ev
,
L. V.
, and
Berkovich
,
A. L.
,
1996
, “
The Parameters of Gas-Turbine Units with Water Injected into the Compressor
,”
Thermal Engineering
,
43
(
6
), pp.
461
–
465
.
11.
Ingistov, S., 2000, “Fog System Performance in Power Augmentation of Heavy Duty Power Generating Gas Turbines GE Frame 7EA,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-305.
12.
Chaker, M., Meher-Homji, C. B., Mee, T. R., and Nicolson, A., 2001, “Inlet Fogging of Gas Turbine Engines-Detailed Climatic Analysis of Gas Turbine Evaporative Cooling Potential,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-526.
Copyright © 2004
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.