Lean premixing prevaporizing (LPP) burners represent a promising solution for low-emission combustion in aeroengines. Since lean premixed combustion suffers from pressure and heat release fluctuations that can be triggered by unsteady large-scale flow structures, a deep knowledge of flow structures formation mechanisms in complex swirling flows is a necessary step in suppressing combustion instabilities. The present paper describes a detailed investigation of the unsteady aerodynamics of a large-scale model of a double swirler aeroengine LPP burner at isothermal conditions. A three-dimensional (3D) laser Doppler velocimeter and an ensemble-averaging technique have been employed to obtain a detailed time-resolved description of the periodically perturbed flow field at the mixing duct exit and associated Reynolds stress and vorticity distributions. Results show a swirling annular jet with an extended region of reverse flow near to the axis. The flow is dominated by a strong periodic perturbation, which occurs in all the three components of velocity. Radial velocity fluctuations cause important periodic displacement of the jet and the inner separated region in the meridional plane. The flow, as expected, is highly turbulent. The periodic stress components have the same order of magnitude of the Reynolds stress components. As a consequence the flow-mixing process is highly enhanced. Turbulence acts on a large spectrum of fluctuation frequencies, whereas the large-scale motion influences the whole flow field in an ordered way that can be dangerous for stability in reactive conditions.

1.
Reynolds
,
W. C.
, and
Hussian
,
A. K.
, 1972, “
The Mechanics of an Organized Wave in Turbulent Shear Flow, Part 3: Theoretical Models and Comparisons with Experiments
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
54
(
2
), pp.
263
288
.
2.
Boutier
,
A.
, 1991, “
Accuracy of Laser Velocimetry
,”
Lecture Series 1991-05
, VKI, Brussels.
3.
Strazisar
,
T.
, 1986, “
Laser Anemometry in Compressors and Turbines
,”
ASME Lecture on Fluid Dynamics of Turbomachinery
.
4.
Modarress
,
D.
,
Tan
,
H.
, and
Nakayama
,
A.
, 1988, “
Evaluation of Signal Processing Techniques in Laser Anemometry
,”
Proc. of Fourth Int. Symp. on Application of Laser Anemometry to Fluid Dynamics
, Istituto Superior Técnico,
Lisbon
, paper 1.20.
5.
Lyn
,
D. A.
,
Einav
,
S.
,
Rodi
,
W.
, and
Park
,
J.-H.
, 1995, “
A Laser Doppler Velocimetry Study of Ensemble-Averaged Characteristics of the Turbulent Near Wake of a Square Cylinder
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
304
, pp.
285
319
.
6.
Chao
,
Y.
,
Leu
,
J.
, and
Hung
,
Y.
, 1991, “
Downstream Boundary Effects on the Spectral Characteristics of a Swirling Flow Field
,”
Exp. Fluids
0723-4864,
10
, pp.
341
348
.
7.
Li
,
G.
, and
Gutmark
,
E.
, 2003, “
Geometry Effects on the Flow Field and the Spectral Characteristics of a Triple Annular Swirler
,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38799.
8.
Schildmacher
,
K.
,
Kock
,
R.
,
Witting
,
S.
,
Krebs
,
W.
, and
Hoffman
,
S.
, 2000, “
Experimental Investigation of the Temporal Air-Fuel Mixing Fluctuations and Cold Flow Instabilities of a Premixing Gas Turbine Burner
,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-0084.
9.
Carrotte
,
J.
, and
Batchelor-Wylam
,
C.
, 2003, “
Characterization of the Instantaneous Velocity and Mixture Field Issuing from a Lean-Premixed Module (LPM)
,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38663.
10.
Panda
,
J.
, and
McLaughlin
,
D. K.
, 1994, “
Experiments on the Instabilities of a Swirling Jet
,”
Phys. Fluids
1070-6631,
6
(
1
), pp.
263
276
.
11.
Merkle
,
K.
,
Büchner
,
H.
,
Zarzalis
,
N.
, and
Sara
,
O. N.
, 2003, “
Influence of Co and Counter Swirl on Lean Stability Limits of an Airblast Nozzle
,” ASME Paper No. GT-2003-38004.
12.
Brücker
,
C.
, 1993, “
Study of Vortex Breakdown by Particle Tracking Velocimetry (PTV), Part 2: Spiral-Type Vortex Breakdown
,”
Exp. Fluids
0723-4864,
14
, pp.
133
139
.
13.
Lucca-Negro
,
O.
, and
O’Doherty
,
T.
, 2001, “
Vortex Breakdown: A Review
,”
Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.
0360-1285,
27
, pp.
431
481
.
You do not currently have access to this content.