This paper proposes a new kind of multifunctional energy system (MES) using natural gas and coal to more efficiently and more economically produce methanol and power. Traditional chemical processes pursue high conversion ratios of chemical energy of fuels. The new MES focuses on the moderate conversion of the chemical energy of fuels. To do this, about 50% of the coal is partially gasified with pure oxygen and steam as oxidant, and then the unconverted residuals (char) and natural gas are utilized synthetically by char-fired reforming to generate syngas. The combustion of char drives the methane/steam-reforming reaction. Here, the reforming reaction is also moderately converted, and the reforming temperature is decreased 100150°C compared with that of the conventional method. The carbon-rich syngas from the partial gasifier of coal and hydrogen-rich syngas from char-fired reformer are mixed together and converted into methanol at a proper conversion ratio (lower than that of the conventional chemical process). Finally, the unconverted syngas is used in a combined cycle as fuel for power generation. As a result, the total exergy efficiency of the new system is 55–60%. Comparing to individual systems, including the integrated gasification combined cycle and the natural gas-based methanol synthesis plants, this new system can generate 10–20% more electricity with the same quantity of fossil fuel input and methanol output. In addition, the possibility of reducing the size of gasifier, reformer, and methanol synthesis reactor may reduce investment costs accordingly. These results may provide a new way to use coal and natural gas more efficiently and economically.

1.
BP Group
, 2008, “
BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2008
.”
2.
Cai
,
R.
,
Lin
,
R.
,
Xiao
,
Y.
, and
Xu
,
D.
, 1993, “
Coal-Fired Combined Cycle Power Generation Technology With High Efficiency, Low Pollution, and Low Water Consumption
,”
UNESCO, Senior Conference of Cleaning Coal-Fired Technology
, Beijing, China.
3.
Longwell
,
J. P.
,
Rubin
,
E. S.
, and
Wilson
,
J.
, 1995, “
Coal: Energy for the Future
,”
Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.
0360-1285,
21
, pp.
269
360
.
4.
Rukes
,
B.
, and
Taud
,
R.
, 2004, “
Status and Perspectives of Fossil Power Generation
,”
Energy
0360-5442,
29
, pp.
1853
1874
.
5.
Larson
,
E. D.
, and
Ren
,
T.
, 2003, “
Synthetic Fuels Production by Indirect Coal Liquefaction
,”
Energy for Sustainable Development
,
7
(
4
), pp.
79
102
.
6.
U.S. Department of Energy and the Gasification Technologies Council
, 2000, “
Gasification-Worldwide Use and Acceptance
.”
7.
Gao
,
L.
,
Jin
,
H.
,
Liu
,
Z.
, and
Zheng
,
D.
, 2004, “
Exergy Analysis of Coal-Based Polygeneration System for Power and Chemical Production
,”
Energy
0360-5442,
29
, pp.
2359
2371
.
8.
Lange
,
J.
, 2001, “
Methanol Synthesis: A Short Review of Technology Improvements
,”
Catal. Today
0920-5861,
64
, pp.
3
8
.
9.
Lozza
,
G.
,
Chiesa
,
P.
, and
De Vita
,
L.
, 1996, “
Combined-Cycle Power Stations Using “Clean-Coal Technologies:” Thermodynamic Analysis of Full Gasification Versus Fluidized Bed Combustion With Partial Gasification
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
118
, pp.
737
748
.
10.
Foster Wheeler Development Corporation
, 2003, “
Development of Pressurized Circulation Fluidized Bed Partial Gasification Module (PGM)
,” Department of Energy, Contract No. DE-FC26-00NT40972.
11.
Tang
,
Z.
, and
Wang
,
Y.
, 2000, “
Efficient and Environment Friendly Use of Coal
,”
Fuel Process. Technol.
0378-3820,
62
, pp.
137
141
.
12.
Xu
,
Y.
,
Jin
,
H.
,
Lin
,
R.
, and
Han
,
W.
, 2008, “
System Study on Partial Gasification Combined Cycle With CO2 Recovery
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
130
, p.
051801
.
13.
Jin
,
H.
,
Ishida
,
M.
,
Kobayashi
,
M.
, and
Numokawa
,
M.
, 1997, “
Exergy Evaluation of Two Current Advanced Power Plants: Supercritical Steam Turbine and Combined Cycle
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
0195-0738,
119
, pp.
250
256
.
14.
Jin
,
H.
, 1994, “
Development of Thermal Power Systems Based on Graphical Exergy Analysis
,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Environmental Chemistry and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
15.
Japan Petroleum Institute
, 1983, “
Design of Methanol Synthesis
.”
16.
Rosen
,
M. A.
, and
Scott
,
D. S.
, 1998, “
Comparative Efficiency Assessments for a Range of Hydrogen Production Process
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
0360-3199,
23
, pp.
653
659
.
17.
Han
,
W.
,
Jin
,
H.
, and
Xu
,
W.
, 2007, “
A Novel Combined Cycle With Synthetic Utilization of Coal and Natural Gas
,”
Energy
0360-5442,
32
, pp.
1334
1342
.
18.
Jin
,
H.
,
Han
,
W.
, and
Gao
,
L.
, 2007, “
Multi-Functional Energy System (MES) With Multi Fossil Fuels and Multi Products
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
129
, pp.
331
337
.
19.
Jin
,
H.
,
Han
,
W.
, and
Gao
,
L.
, 2008, “
A Novel Multifunctional Energy System (MES) for CO2 Removal With Zero Energy Penalty
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
130
, p.
021401
.
20.
Chiesa
,
P.
,
Lozza
,
G.
, and
Mazzocchi
,
L.
, 2005, “
Using Hydrogen as Gas Turbine Fuel
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
127
, pp.
73
80
.
21.
Kesser
,
K. F.
,
Hoffman
,
M. A.
, and
Baughn
,
J. W.
, 1994, “
Analysis of a Basic Chemically Recuperated Gas Turbine Power Plant
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
116
(
2
), pp.
277
284
.
22.
Ishida
,
M.
, and
Kawamura
,
K.
, 1982, “
Energy and Exergy Analysis of a Chemical Process System With Distributed Parameters Based on the Energy-Direction Factor Diagram
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev.
0196-4305,
21
, pp.
690
695
.
You do not currently have access to this content.