Postcombustion CO2 capture from natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plants is challenging due to the large flow of flue gas with low CO2 content (∼3–4 vol %) that needs to be processed in the capture stage. A number of alternatives have been proposed to solve this issue and reduce the costs of the associated CO2 capture plant. This work focuses on the selective exhaust gas recirculation (S-EGR) configuration, which uses a membrane to selectively recirculate CO2 back to the inlet of the compressor of the turbine, thereby greatly increasing the CO2 content of the flue gas sent to the capture system. For this purpose, a parallel S-EGR NGCC system (53% S-EGR ratio) coupled to an amine capture plant (ACP) using monoethanolamine (MEA) 30 wt % was simulated using gCCS (gPROMS). It was benchmarked against an unabated NGCC system, a conventional NGCC coupled with an ACP (NGCC + carbon capture and storage (CCS)), and an EGR NGCC power plant (39% EGR ratio) using amine scrubbing as the downstream capture technology. The results obtained indicate that the net power efficiency of the parallel S-EGR system can be up to 49.3% depending on the specific consumption of the auxiliary S-EGR systems, compared to the 49.0% and 49.8% values obtained for the NGCC + CCS and EGR systems, respectively. A preliminary economic study was also carried out to quantify the potential of the parallel S-EGR configuration. This high-level analysis shows that the cost of electricity (COE) for the parallel S-EGR system varies from 82.1 to 90.0 $/MWhe for the scenarios considered, with the cost of CO2 avoided (COA) being in the range of 79.7–105.1 $/ton CO2. The results obtained indicate that there are potential advantages of the parallel S-EGR system in comparison to the NGCC + CCS configuration in some scenarios. However, further benefits with respect to the EGR configuration will depend on future advancements and cost reductions achieved on membrane-based systems.

References

1.
IEA
,
2015
, World Energy Outlook 2015, International Energy Agency, Paris, France.
2.
IEAGHG
,
2012
, “
CO2 Capture at Gas Fired Power Plants
,” International Energy Agency Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Cheltenham, UK, Report No.
2012/8
.http://www.ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/2012-08.pdf
3.
Stéphenne
,
K.
,
2014
, “
Start-Up of World's First Commercial Post-Combustion Coal Fired CCS Project: Contribution of Shell Cansolv to SaskPower Boundary Dam ICCS Project
,”
Energy Procedia
,
63
, pp.
6106
6110
.
4.
NRG
, 2017, “
NRG Energy, JX Nippon Complete World's Largest Post-Combustion Carbon Capture Facility On-Budget and On-Schedule
,” NRG Energy, Inc., Princeton, NJ, accessed Feb. 1, 2017, http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20170109006496/en/NRG-Energy-JX-Nippon-Complete-World%E2%80%99s-Largest
5.
Bolland
,
O.
, and
Sæther
,
S.
,
1992
, “
New Concepts for Natural Gas Fired Power Plants Which Simplify the Recovery of Carbon Dioxide
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
33
(5–8), pp.
467
475
.
6.
Bolland
,
O.
, and
Mathieu
,
P.
,
1998
, “
Comparison of Two CO2 Removal Options in Combined Cycle Power Plants
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
39
(16–18), pp.
1653
1663
.
7.
Li
,
H.
,
Ditaranto
,
M.
, and
Berstad
,
D.
,
2011
, “
Technologies for Increasing CO2 Concentration in Exhaust Gas From Natural Gas-Fired Power Production With Post-Combustion, Amine-Based CO2 Capture
,”
Energy
,
36
(
2
), pp.
1124
1133
.
8.
Li
,
H.
,
Haugen
,
G.
,
Ditaranto
,
M.
,
Berstad
,
D.
, and
Jordal
,
K.
,
2011
, “
Impacts of Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) on the Natural Gas Combined Cycle Integrated With Chemical Absorption CO2 Capture Technology
,”
Energy Procedia
,
4
, pp.
1411
1418
.
9.
Ali
,
U.
,
Agbonghae
,
E. O.
,
Hughes
,
K. J.
,
Ingham
,
D. B.
,
Ma
,
L.
, and
Pourkashanian
,
M.
,
2016
, “
Techno-Economic Process Design of a Commercial-Scale Amine-Based CO2 Capture System for Natural Gas Combined Cycle Power Plant With Exhaust Gas Recirculation
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
,
103
, pp.
747
758
.
10.
Merkel
,
T. C.
,
Wei
,
X.
,
He
,
Z.
,
White
,
L. S.
,
Wijmans
,
J. G.
, and
Baker
,
R. W.
,
2013
, “
Selective Exhaust Gas Recycle With Membranes for CO2 Capture From Natural Gas Combined Cycle Power Plants
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
,
52
(
3
), pp.
1150
1159
.
11.
ElKady
,
A. M.
,
Evulet
,
A.
,
Brand
,
A.
,
Ursin
,
T. P.
, and
Lynghjem
,
A.
,
2009
, “
Application of Exhaust Gas Recirculation in a DLN F-Class Combustion System for Postcombustion Carbon Capture
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
131
(
3
), p.
034505
.
12.
Ditaranto
,
M.
,
Hals
,
J.
, and
Bjørge
,
T.
,
2009
, “
Investigation on the In-Flame NO Reburning in Turbine Exhaust Gas
,”
Proc. Combust. Inst.
,
32
(
2
), pp.
2659
2666
.
13.
National Energy Technology Laboratory
,
2013
, “
Current and Future Technologies for Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC) Power Plants
,” National Energy Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA, Report No.
DOE/NETL-341/061013
.https://www.netl.doe.gov/research/energy-analysis/search-publications/vuedetails?id=607
14.
PSE
, 2017, “
gCCS—Overview
,” Process Systems Enterprise Limited, London, accessed Feb. 1, 2017, https://www.psenterprise.com/sectors/power/ccs/gccs
15.
ElKady
,
A. M.
,
Evulet
,
A.
,
Brand
,
A.
,
Ursin
,
T. P.
, and
Lynghjem
,
A.
,
2008
, “
Exhaust Gas Recirculation in DLN F-Class Gas Turbines for Post-Combustion CO2 Capture
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2008-51152.
16.
Mac Dowell
,
N.
, and
Shah
,
N.
,
2013
, “
Identification of the Cost-Optimal Degree of CO2 Capture: An Optimisation Study Using Dynamic Process Models
,”
Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control
,
13
, pp.
44
58
.
17.
Agbonghae
,
E. O.
,
Hughes
,
K. J.
,
Ingham
,
D. B.
,
Ma
,
L.
, and
Pourkashanian
,
M.
,
2014
, “
Optimal Process Design of Commercial-Scale Amine-Based CO2 Capture Plants
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
,
53
(
38
), pp.
14815
14829
.
18.
Strigle
,
R. F.
,
1994
,
Packed Tower Design and Applications: Random and Structured Packings
, 2nd ed.,
Gulf Publishing
,
Houston, TX
.
19.
Darde
,
A.
,
Prabhakar
,
R.
,
Tranier
,
J.-P.
, and
Perrin
,
N.
,
2009
, “
Air Separation and Flue Gas Compression and Purification Units for Oxy-Coal Combustion Systems
,”
Energy Procedia
,
1
(
1
), pp.
527
534
.
20.
NETL
,
2013
, “
Quality Guidelines for Energy System Studies: Capital Cost Scaling Methodology
,” National Energy Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA, Report No.
DOE/NETL-341/013113
https://www.netl.doe.gov/research/energy-analysis/search-publications/vuedetails?id=1026.
21.
IPCC
,
2005
,
IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage
(Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change),
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
.
22.
Zhai
,
H.
, and
Rubin
,
E. S.
,
2013
, “
Techno-Economic Assessment of Polymer Membrane Systems for Postcombustion Carbon Capture at Coal-Fired Power Plants
,”
Environ. Sci. Technol.
,
47
(
6
), pp.
3006
3014
.
23.
Rao
,
A. B.
,
2002
, “
A Technical, Economic and Environmental Assessment of Amine-Based CO2 Capture Technology for Power Plant Greenhouse Gas Control
,”
Environ. Sci. Technol.
,
36
(
20
), pp.
4467
4475
.
24.
Carnegie Mellon University
, 2017, “
Integrated Environmental Control Model
,” Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, accessed Feb. 1, 2017, https://www.cmu.edu/epp/iecm/about.html
25.
Voleno
,
A.
,
Romano
,
M. C.
,
Turi
,
D. M.
,
Chiesa
,
P.
,
Ho
,
M. T.
, and
Wiley
,
D. E.
,
2014
, “
Post-Combustion CO2 Capture From Natural Gas Combined Cycles by Solvent Supported Membranes
,”
Energy Procedia
,
63
, pp.
7389
7397
.
26.
White
,
L. S.
,
Wei
,
X.
,
Pande
,
S.
,
Wu
,
T.
, and
Merkel
,
T. C.
,
2015
, “
Extended Flue Gas Trials With a Membrane-Based Pilot Plant at a One-Ton-Per-Day Carbon Capture Rate
,”
J. Membr. Sci.
,
496
, pp.
48
57
.
27.
IEAGHG
,
2009
, “
Criteria for Technical and Economic Assessment of Plants With Low CO2 Emissions
,” International Energy Agency Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Cheltenham, UK, Report No.
2009/TR3
http://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/2009-TR3.pdf.
28.
DOE/NETL
,
2015
, “
Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants Volume 1a: Bituminous Coal (PC) and Natural Gas to Electricity—Revision 3
,” National Energy Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA, Report No.
DOE/NETL-2015/1723
https://www.netl.doe.gov/File%20Library/Research/Energy%20Analysis/Publications/Rev3Vol1aPC_NGCC_final.pdf.
29.
Ho
,
M. T.
,
Allinson
,
G. W.
, and
Wiley
,
D. E.
,
2008
, “
Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture From Flue Gases Using Membrane Technology
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
,
47
(
5
), pp.
1562
1568
.
You do not currently have access to this content.