Filamentary brushing tools are used in a wide range of surface finishing processes, such as deburring, edge radiusing, polishing, and surface decontamination applications. Moreover, these tools are easily adapted to automation because the filament tips, which perform the machining operation, readily conform to the workpart surface without the need for sophisticated control systems technology. However, little is known about the material removal mechanics of filamentary brushes and, therefore, trial-and-error experimentation is often necessary before the tool is implemented in a production environment. This uncertainty of performance can be traced to a lack of understanding of the actual forces that are generated within the contact zone, that is, along the interface of the filament tip and workpart surface. Although previous experimental research has focused on the overall (i.e., resultant) brush force exerted onto the workpart, no information exists in the literature regarding the variation of force within the contact zone. Such information is essential for understanding the material removal profile within the contact zone, and could provide valuable information regarding the most active machining site along the contact surface. In this paper, a novel experiment is proposed for evaluating the force profile of filament tip forces that are generated within the contact region of a brushed surface. A specially designed workpart fixture is constructed and used in conjunction with a multiaxis force sensor for measuring the detailed force variation within the contact zone. The experiment is conducted using a wire brush at several different rotational speeds, which enables one to ascertain the role of filament inertia in the material removal process. Findings are reported which suggest that a significantly enhanced material removal rate can be achieved at a selective location within the contact zone at moderately elevated spindle speeds.

1.
FitzPatrick, P. R., and Paul, F. W., 1987, “Robotic Finishing Using Brushes—Material Removal Mechanics,” SME, Deburring and Surface Conditioning Conference, Phoenix, AZ, MR87-156.
2.
Stango
,
R. J.
,
Cariapa
,
V.
,
Prasad
,
A.
, and
Liang
,
S. K.
,
1991
, “
Measurement and Analysis of Brushing Tool Performance Characteristics—Part I: Stiffness Response
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
113
(
3
), pp.
283
289
.
3.
Cariapa
,
V.
,
Stango
,
R. J.
,
Liang
,
S. K.
, and
Prasad
,
A.
,
1991
, “
Measurement and Analysis of Brushing Tool Performance Characteristics—Part II: Contact Zone Geometry
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
113
(
3
), pp.
290
296
.
4.
Stango
,
R. J.
,
Heinrich
,
S. M.
, and
Shia
,
C. Y.
,
1989
, “
Analysis of Constrained Filament Deformation and Stiffness Properties of Brushes
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
111
(
3
), pp.
238
243
.
5.
Shia
,
C. Y.
, and
Stango
,
R. J.
,
1994
, “
On the Frictional Response of Circular Filamentary Brush in Contact With Planar Workpart
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
,
34
(
4
), pp.
573
589
.
6.
Shia
,
C. Y.
,
Stango
,
R. J.
, and
Heinrich
,
S. M.
1998
, “
Analysis of Contact Mechanics for a Circular Filamentary Brush/Workpart System: Solution Method and Numerical Studies
,”
ASME J. Manuf. Science and Engineering
,
120
(
4
), pp.
715
721
.
1.
Hatman
,
V. G.
,
Haque
,
I.
, and
Bagchi
,
A.
,
1996
, “
Dynamics of a Flexible Rotating Beam Interacting With a Flat Rigid Surface—Part I: Model Development
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
194
(
5
), pp.
653
669
; and
2.
“Part II: Numerical Solution,”
194
(
5
), pp.
671
683
.
1.
Cariapa
,
V.
,
Stango
,
R. J.
,
Chen
,
L.
, and
Hermann
,
R.
,
1992
, “
Aspects of Process Model for Automatic Control of Edge Deburring With Filamentary Brush
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
114
(
3
), pp.
294
300
.
2.
Stango
,
R. J.
,
Chen
,
L.
, and
Cariapa
,
V.
,
1999
, “
Automated Deburring With Filamentary Brush: Prescribed Burr Geometry
,”
ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
,
121
(
3
), pp.
385
392
.
3.
Chen
,
L.
,
Stango
,
R. J.
, and
Cariapa
,
V.
,
2001
, “
Development of Force-Control Model for Edge-Deburring With Filamentary Brush
,”
ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
,
123
(
3
), pp.
528
532
.
4.
Tarrab, K., 1990, “Dynamic Properties of Circular Brushes and Evaluation of Filamentary Stress: Photographic Analysis,” M.S. thesis, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI.
5.
Popken, J. L., 1990, “Three-Dimensional Topology of Plates Generated by Circular Brushing Tools,” M.S. thesis, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI.
You do not currently have access to this content.