This paper presents a comparative study of the AC and MFDC resistance spot welding process. Both experiments and finite element simulation were conducted to compare the weld size and energy consumption. The experiments were performed on two identical spot welding machines, one with a single phase ac and the other with a mid-frequency DC weld control. The machines were instrumented such that both the primary and secondary voltage and current signals could be collected for energy calculation. The finite element simulation model was developed to understand the underlying mechanisms of the difference between the ac and MFDC processes. The effect of the current waveform was investigated by using the actual process measurements as an input to the simulation model. It is shown that the MFDC process generally produces larger welds than the AC process with the same root-mean-square welding current. However, this difference is more prominent when the welding current is relatively low. Overall, the AC welding process consumes more energy to make a same sized weld than the MFDC process. The larger the welding current is used, the less efficient the AC welding process will become. The differences between the two welding processes are caused by the contact resistance behavior and the electrical inductance in the AC welding process.

1.
Brown
,
B. M.
, 1987, “
A Comparsion of AC and DC Current in the Resistance Spot Welding of Automotive Steels
,”
Weld. J. (Miami, FL, U. S.)
0043-2296,
66
(
1
), pp.
18
23
.
2.
DuCharme
,
R. C.
, 2002, “
An Overview of Welding in the Automotive Industry
,”
Sheet Metal Welding Conference X, American Welding Society, Detroit Section, Sterling Heights, MI, May 15–17, Paper 1-1
.
3.
Matsuyama
,
K.
, 2002, “
Polarity Effect in DC Resistance Spot Welding Coated Steels
,”
Sheet Metal Welding Conference X, American Welding Society, Detroit Section, Sterling Heights, MI, May 15–17, Paper 1-3
.
4.
Thornton
,
M. C.
,
Newton
,
C. J.
,
Keay
,
B. F. P.
,
Sheasby
,
P. G.
, and
Evans
,
J. T.
, 1997, “
Some Surface Factors that Affect the Spot Welding of Aluminium
,”
Trans. Inst. Met. Finish.
0020-2967,
75
, Part 4, pp.
165
170
.
5.
Hao
,
M.
,
Osman
,
K. A.
,
Boomer
,
D. R.
, and
Newton
,
C. J.
, 1996, “
Developments in Characterization of Resistance Spot Welding of Aluminum
,”
Weld. J. (Miami, FL, U. S.)
0043-2296,
75
(
1
), pp.
1s
7s
.
6.
Agashe
,
S.
and
Zhang
,
H.
, 2003, “
Selection of Schedules Based on Heat Balance in Resistance Spot Welding
,”
Weld. J. (Miami, FL, U. S.)
0043-2296,
82
(
7
), pp.
179s
183s
.
7.
Li
,
W.
,
Zhang
,
H.
, and
Hu
,
S. J.
, 2000, “
Signal Processing Issues in Resistance Spot Welding
,”
Sheet Metal Welding Conference IX, American Welding Society, Detroit Section, Paper 3-2, Sterling Heights, MI
.
8.
Auto/Steel Partnership
(A/SP), 1995,
Weld Quality Test Method Manual
,
Standardized Test Method Task Force
.
9.
Feng
,
Z.
,
Babu
,
S. S.
,
Riemer
,
B. W.
,
Santella
,
M. L.
,
Gould
,
J. E.
, and
Kimchi
,
M.
, 2003, “
Modeling of Resistance Spot Welds-Process and Performance
,”
Weld. Res. Abroad
0043-2318,
49
(
2
), pp.
29
35
.
10.
Sun
,
X.
and
Dong
,
P.
, 2000, “
Analysis of Aluminum Resistance Spot Welding Processes Using Coupled Finite Element Procedures
,”
Weld. J. (Miami, FL, U. S.)
0043-2296,
79
(
8
), pp.
215s
221s
.
11.
Chang
,
B. H.
and
Zhou
,
Y.
, 2003, “
Numerical Study on the Effect of Electrode Force in Small-scale Resistance Spot Welding
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
0924-0136,
139
, pp.
635
641
.
12.
Vogler
,
M. M.
and
Sheppard
,
S. D.
, 1993, “
Electrical Contact Resistance under High Loads and Elevated Temperatures
,”
Weld. J. (Miami, FL, U. S.)
0043-2296,
72
, pp.
231s
238s
.
13.
Tsai
,
C. L.
,
Dai
,
W. L.
,
Dickinson
,
D. W.
, and
Papritan
,
J. C.
, 1991, “
Analysis and Development of a Real-time Control Methodology in Resistance Spot Welding
,”
Weld. J. (Miami, FL, U. S.)
0043-2296,
70
(
12
), pp.
339s
351s
.
You do not currently have access to this content.