This paper presents a comparative study of the AC and MFDC resistance spot welding process. Both experiments and finite element simulation were conducted to compare the weld size and energy consumption. The experiments were performed on two identical spot welding machines, one with a single phase ac and the other with a mid-frequency DC weld control. The machines were instrumented such that both the primary and secondary voltage and current signals could be collected for energy calculation. The finite element simulation model was developed to understand the underlying mechanisms of the difference between the ac and MFDC processes. The effect of the current waveform was investigated by using the actual process measurements as an input to the simulation model. It is shown that the MFDC process generally produces larger welds than the AC process with the same root-mean-square welding current. However, this difference is more prominent when the welding current is relatively low. Overall, the AC welding process consumes more energy to make a same sized weld than the MFDC process. The larger the welding current is used, the less efficient the AC welding process will become. The differences between the two welding processes are caused by the contact resistance behavior and the electrical inductance in the AC welding process.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
August 2005
Technical Papers
A Comparative Study of Single-Phase AC and Multiphase DC Resistance Spot Welding
Wei Li,
Wei Li
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Washington
, Seattle, WA 98195
Search for other works by this author on:
Daniel Cerjanec,
Daniel Cerjanec
Advanced Mnufacturing Engineering,
DaimlerChrysler Corporation
, Auburn Hills, MI 48326
Search for other works by this author on:
Gerald A. Grzadzinski
Gerald A. Grzadzinski
Advanced Mnufacturing Engineering,
DaimlerChrysler Corporation
, Auburn Hills, MI 48326
Search for other works by this author on:
Wei Li
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Washington
, Seattle, WA 98195
Daniel Cerjanec
Advanced Mnufacturing Engineering,
DaimlerChrysler Corporation
, Auburn Hills, MI 48326
Gerald A. Grzadzinski
Advanced Mnufacturing Engineering,
DaimlerChrysler Corporation
, Auburn Hills, MI 48326J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Aug 2005, 127(3): 583-589 (7 pages)
Published Online: November 11, 2004
Article history
Received:
January 15, 2004
Revised:
November 11, 2004
Citation
Li, W., Cerjanec, D., and Grzadzinski, G. A. (November 11, 2004). "A Comparative Study of Single-Phase AC and Multiphase DC Resistance Spot Welding." ASME. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. August 2005; 127(3): 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1949621
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
A Study on the Influence of Polypropylene Melt Flow Index on Nonwoven Fibers Produced Through Hot Melt Centrifugal Spinning
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (April 2025)
Arc Characteristics of Aluminum Alloy Double-Wire High-Frequency Pulsed GMAW
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (April 2025)
Related Articles
A Microscopic Approach to Determine Electrothermal Contact Conditions During Resistance Spot Welding Process
J. Heat Transfer (February,2009)
Modeling Dynamic Electrical Resistance During Resistance Spot Welding
J. Heat Transfer (June,2001)
Effect of Compressive Pressure on the Contact Behavior Between Bipolar Plate and Gas Diffusion Layer in a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell
J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol (August,2014)
Effect of Forging Force on Fatigue Behavior of Spot Welded Joints of Aluminum Alloy 5182
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (February,2007)
Related Chapters
STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT OF PIPELINE GIRTH WELDS USING GAUSSIAN PROCESS REGRESSION
Pipeline Integrity Management Under Geohazard Conditions (PIMG)
LOW STRAIN CAPACITY GIRTH WELDS OF NEWLY CONSTRUCTED PIPELINES AND MITIGATIVE APPROACHES
Pipeline Integrity Management Under Geohazard Conditions (PIMG)
Subsection NE—Class MC Components
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes, Volume 1 Sixth Edition