Modular product design can facilitate the diversification of product variety at a low cost. Reconfigurable manufacturing, if planned properly, is able to deliver high productivity and quick responsiveness to market changes. Together, the two could provide an unprecedented competitive edge to a manufacturing company. The production of a family of modular products in a reconfigurable manufacturing system often requires reorganizing the manufacturing system in such a way that each configuration corresponds to one product variant in the same family. The successful implementation of this strategy lies in proper scheduling of the modular product operations and optimal selection of a configuration for producing each product variant. These two issues are closely related and have a strong impact on each other. Nevertheless, they have often been treated separately, rendering inefficient, infeasible, and conflicting decisions. As such, an integrated model is developed to address the two problems simultaneously. The objective is to minimize the sum of the manufacturing cost components that are affected by the two planning decisions. These include reconfiguration cost, machine idle cost, material handling cost, and work-in-process cost incurred in producing a batch of product variants. Due to the combinatorial nature of the problem, a genetic algorithm (GA) is proposed to provide quick and near-optimal solutions. A case study is conducted using a steering column to illustrate the application of the integrated approach. Our computational experience shows that the proposed GA substantially outperforms a popular optimization software package, LINGO, in terms of both solution quality and computing efficiency.

1.
Mehrabi
,
M. G.
,
Ulsoy
,
A. G.
,
Koren
,
Y.
, and
Heytler
,
P.
, 2002, “
Trends and Perspectives in Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
,”
J. Intell. Manuf.
0956-5515,
13
, pp.
135
146
.
2.
Mehrabi
,
M. G.
,
Ulsoy
,
A. G.
, and
Koren
,
Y.
, 2000, “
Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems: Key to Future Manufacturing
,”
J. Intell. Manuf.
0956-5515,
11
, pp.
403
419
.
3.
Yigit
,
A. S.
,
Ulsoy
,
A. G.
, and
Allahverdi
,
A.
, 2002, “
Optimizing Modular Product Design for Reconfigurable Manufacturing
,”
J. Intell. Manuf.
0956-5515,
13
, pp.
309
316
.
4.
Yigit
,
A. S.
, and
Allahverdi
,
A.
, 2003, “
Optimal Selection of Module Instances for Modular Products in Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
0020-7543,
41
(
17
), pp.
4063
4074
.
5.
Lee
,
G. H.
, 1997, “
Reconfigurability Consideration Design of Components and Manufacturing Systems
,”
Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.
0268-3768,
13
, pp.
376
386
.
6.
Abdi
,
M. R.
, and
Labib
,
A. W.
, 2004, “
Grouping and Selecting Products: The Design Key of Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems (RMSs)
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
0020-7543,
42
(
3
), pp.
521
546
.
7.
Stafford
,
E. F.
, Jr.
, and
Tseng
,
F. T.
, 2002, “
Two General Models for a Family of Flowshop Sequencing Problems
,”
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
0377-2217,
142
(
2
), pp.
282
293
.
8.
Kolonko
,
M.
, 1999, “
Some New Results on Simulated Annealing Applied to the Job Shop Scheduling Problem
,”
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
0377-2217,
113
(
1
), pp.
123
136
.
9.
Xia
,
W.
, and
Wu
,
Z.
, 2005, “
An Effective Hybrid Optimization Approach for Multi-Objective Flexible Job-Shop Scheduling Problems
,”
Comput. Ind. Eng.
0360-8352,
48
, pp.
409
425
.
10.
Yang
,
T.
, and
Peters
,
B. A.
, 1998, “
Flexible Machine Layout Design for Dynamic and Uncertain Production Environments
,”
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
0377-2217,
108
, pp.
49
64
.
11.
Travaini
,
E.
,
Pedrazzoli
,
P.
,
Rinaldi
,
R.
, and
Boer
,
C. R.
, 2002, “
Methodological Approach and Reconfiguration Tool for Assembly Systems
,”
CIRP Annals
,
51
, pp.
117
120
.
12.
Khoo
,
L. P.
, and
Situmdrang
,
T. D.
, 2003, “
Solving the Assembly Configuration Problem for Modular Products Using an Immune Algorithm Approach
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
0020-7543,
41
(
15
), pp.
3419
3434
.
13.
Yu
,
J.
,
Yin
,
Y.
,
Sheng
,
X.
, and
Chen
,
Z.
, 2003, “
Modelling Strategies for Reconfigurable Assembly Systems
,”
Assembly Automation
,
23
(
3
), pp.
266
272
.
14.
He
,
D. W.
, and
Kusiak
,
A.
, 1997, “
Design of Assembly System for Modular Products
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
1042-296X,
13
, pp.
646
655
.
15.
He
,
D. W.
, and
Kusiak
,
A.
, 1998, “
Designing an Assembly Line for Modular Products
,”
Comput. Ind. Eng.
0360-8352,
34
(
1
), pp.
37
52
.
16.
Holland
,
J. H.
, 1975,
Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems
,
University of Michigan Press
,
Ann Arbor
.
17.
Kim
,
Y. K.
,
Park
,
K.
, and
Ko
,
J.
, 2003, “
A Symbiotic Evolutionary Algorithm for the Integration of Process Planning and Job Shop Scheduling
,”
Comput. Oper. Res.
0305-0548,
30
, pp.
1151
1171
.
18.
Yeo
,
K. K.
,
Young
,
J. K.
, and
Yeo
,
K.
, 1996, “
Genetic Algorithms for Assembly Line Balancing With Various Objectives
,”
Comput. Ind. Eng.
0360-8352,
30
(
3
), pp.
397
409
.
19.
Pirlot
,
M.
, 1996, “
General Local Search Methods
,”
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
0377-2217,
92
, pp.
493
511
.
20.
Rekiek
,
B.
,
Falkenauer
,
E.
, and
Delchambre
,
A.
, 1997, “
Multi-Product Resource Planning
,”
Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning
, Marina del Rey, CA, pp.
115
121
.
You do not currently have access to this content.