Since the vehicle program in the automotive industry gets more and more extensive, the costs related to inspection increase. Therefore, there are needs for more effective inspection preparation. In many situations, a large number of inspection points are measured, despite the fact that only a small subset of points is needed. A method, based on cluster analysis, for identifying redundant inspection points has earlier been successfully tested on industrial cases. Cluster analysis is used for grouping the variables into clusters, where the points in each cluster are highly correlated. From every cluster only one representing point is selected for inspection. In this paper the method is further developed, and multiple linear regression is used for evaluating how much of the information is lost when discarding an inspection point. The information loss can be quantified using an efficiency measure based on linear multiple regression, where the part of the variation in the discarded variables that can be explained by the remaining variables is calculated. This measure can be illustrated graphically and that helps to decide how many clusters that should be formed, i.e., how many inspection points that can be discarded.

1.
Wärmefjord
,
K.
,
Carlson
,
J. S.
, and
Söderberg
,
R.
, 2007, “
Geometrical Inspection Point Reduction for Rigid and Non-Rigid Parts Using Cluster Analysis—An Industrial Verification
,”
Tenth CIRP Conference on Computer Aided Tolerancing Specification and Verification for Assemblies
, Erlangen, Germany.
2.
Carlson
,
J. S.
,
Söderberg
,
R.
, and
Lindkvist
,
L.
, 2003, “
Geometrical Inspection Point Reduction Based on Combined Cluster and Sensitivity Analysis
,”
Proceedings of the International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition
, Washington, DC.
3.
Söderberg
,
R.
,
Lindkvist
,
L.
, and
Carlson
,
J.
, 2006, “
Virtual Geometry Assurance for Effective Product Realization
,”
First Nordic Conference on Product Lifecycle Management—NordPLM‘06
, Göteborg, Sweden.
4.
Lindkvist
,
L.
, and
Söderberg
,
R.
, 2003, “
Computer-Aided Tolerance Chain and Stability Analysis
,”
J. Eng. Des.
,
14
(
1
), pp.
17
39
. 0954-4828
5.
Jackson
,
J. E.
, 2003,
A User’s Guide to Principal Components
,
Wiley
,
Hoboken, NJ
.
6.
Everitt
,
B. S.
,
Landau
,
L.
, and
Leese
,
M.
, 2001,
Cluster Analysis
, 4th ed.,
Arnold
,
London
.
7.
Jolliffe
,
I. T.
, 1972, “
Discarding Variables in a Principle Component Analysis I: Artificial Data
,”
Appl. Stat.
0285-0370,
21
, pp.
160
173
.
8.
Al-Kandari
,
N. M.
, and
Jolliffe
,
I. T.
, 2005, “
Variable Selection and Interpretation in Correlation Principal Components
,”
Environmetrics
1180-4009,
16
, pp.
659
672
.
9.
Gordon
,
A. D.
, 1999,
Classification
, 2nd ed.,
Chapman and Hall
,
Boca Raton, FL
.
10.
Milligan
,
G. W.
, and
Cooper
,
M. C.
, 1985, “
An Examination of Procedures for Determining the Number of Clusters in a Data Set
,”
Psychometrika
0033-3123,
50
(
2
), pp.
159
179
.
11.
King
,
J. R.
, and
Jackson
,
D. A.
, 1999, “
Variable Selection in Large Environmental Data Sets Using Principal Components Analysis
,”
Environmetrics
1180-4009,
10
, pp.
67
77
.
12.
Montgomery
,
D. C.
, and
Runger
,
G. C.
, 2006,
Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers
, 4th ed.,
Wiley
,
New York
.
13.
Johnson
,
R.
, and
Wichern
,
D.
, 1998,
Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis
, 4th ed.,
Prentice-Hall
,
Upper Saddle River, NJ
.
14.
Rawlings
,
J. O.
,
Pantula
,
S. G.
, and
Dickey
,
D. A.
, 1998,
Applied Regression Analysis: A Research Tool
, 2nd ed.,
Springer-Verlag
,
New York
.
15.
Jolliffe
,
I. T.
, 1973, “
Discarding Variables in a Principle Component Analysis II: Real Data
,”
Appl. Stat.
0285-0370,
22
(
1
), pp.
21
31
.
16.
Carlson
,
J. S.
, 1999, “
Root Cause Analysis for Fixtures and Locating Schemes Using Variation Data
,”
Proceedings of the Sixth CIRP International Seminar on Computer-Aided Tolerancing
, pp.
111
120
.
17.
Montgomery
,
D. C.
, 2005,
Introduction to Statistical Quality Control
, 5th ed.,
Wiley
,
Hoboken, NJ
.
You do not currently have access to this content.