Ductile iron can acquire enhanced thermal and mechanical properties from austempering heat treatment. The present study aims to identify the function of different cutting parameters affecting machinability and to quantify its effects. Turning was performed to test machinability according to the ISO3685-1993 (E) standard. After austenitizing at 900 °C for 90 min, austempered ductile iron (ADI) specimens were quenched in a salt bath at 380 °C for 90 min. The cutting force signals along three directions were measured in real time, whereas flank wear and surface roughness were measured offline. For the cutting parameters, the cutting speed and depth of cut were varied, but the feed rate was kept constant. In the flank wear tests, machining length was corresponded to tool life. In addition, in order to find out the effect of cutting parameters on surface roughness (Ra), tangential force (Ft), and flank wear (VB) during turning, response surface methodology (RSM) was utilized by using experimental data. The effect of the depth of cut on the surface roughness was negligible but considerable in the cutting forces. The increased cutting speed produced a positive effect on surface roughness. It is found that the cutting speed was the dominant factor on the surface roughness, tangential force, and flank wear.

References

1.
Janowak
,
J. F.
, and
Gundlach
,
R. B.
, 1983, “
Development of a Ductile Iron for Commercial Austempering
,”
Trans. Am. Foundry Soc.
,
54
(
83
), pp.
377
388
.
2.
Shea
,
M. M.
, and
Ryntz
,
E. F.
, 1986, “
Austempering Nodular Iron for Optimum Toughness
,”
Trans. Am. Foundry Soc.
,
86
(
125
), pp.
683
688
.
3.
Ozel
,
A.
, 1994, “
Investigation of the Effect of Austempering Heat Treatment on the Impact Strength and Impact Transition Temperature in GGG 40-80 Class Ductile Irons
,” PhD thesis, ITU-Institute of Science and Technology, Istanbul, Turkey.
4.
Trudel
,
A.
, and
Gagne
,
M.
, 1997, “
Effect of Composition and Heat Treatment Parameters on the Characteristics of Austempered Ductile Irons
,”
Can. Metall. Q.
,
36
(
5
), pp.
289
298
.
5.
Putatunda
,
S. K.
, and
Gadicherla
,
K.
, 2000, “
Effect of Austempering Time on Mechanical Properties of a Low Manganese Austempered Ductile Iron
,”
J. Mater. Eng. Perform.
,
9
(
2
), pp.
193
203
.
6.
Rafaey
,
A.
, and
Fatahalla
,
N.
, 2003, “
Effect of Microstructure on Properties of ADI and Low Alloyed Ductile Iron
,”
J. Mater. Sci.
,
38
, pp.
351
362
.
7.
Delia
,
M.
,
Alaalam
,
M.
, and
Grech
,
M.
, 1998, “
Effect of Austenitizing Conditions on the Impact Properties of an Alloyed Austempered Ductile Iron of Initially Ferritic Matrix Structure
,”
J. Mater. Eng. Perform.
,
7
(
2
), pp.
265
272
.
8.
Gagne
,
M.
, 1985, “
The Influence of Manganese and Silicon on the Microstructure and Tensile Properties of Austempered Ductile Iron
,”
Trans. Am. Foundry Soc.
,
85
(
133
), pp.
801
812
.
9.
Bosnjak
,
B.
,
Radulovic
,
B.
,
Pop-Toner
,
K.
, and
Asanovic
,
V.
, 2001, “
Influence of Microalloying and Heat Treatment on the Kinetics of Bainitic Reaction in Austempered Ductile Iron
,”
J. Mater. Eng. Perform.
,
10
(
2
), pp.
203
211
.
10.
Degarmo
,
E. P.
,
Black
,
J. T.
, and
Kahser
,
R. A.
, 1997,
Materials and Process in Manufacturing
, 8th ed.,
Prentice-Hall
,
NJ
.
11.
Lerner
,
Y. S.
, and
Kingsbury
,
G. R.
, 1998, “
Wear Resistance Properties of Austempered Ductile Iron
,”
J. Mater. Eng. Perform.
,
7
(
1
), pp.
48
52
.
12.
Şeker
,
U.
, and
Hasirci
,
H.
, 2006, “
Evaluation of Machinability of Austempered Ductile Irons in Terms of Cutting Force and Surface Quality
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
,
173
(
3
), pp.
260
268
.
13.
Cakir
,
M. C.
, and
Isik
,
Y.
, 2008, “
Investigating the Machinability of Austempered Ductile Irons Having Different Austempering Temperatures and Times
,”
Mater. Des.
,
29
, pp.
937
942
.
14.
Seah
,
K. H. W.
, and
Sharma
,
S. C.
, 1995, “
Machinability of Alloyed Austempered Ductile Iron
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
,
35
(
10
), pp.
1475
1479
.
15.
Moncada
,
O. J.
,
Spicacci
,
R. H.
, and
Sikora
,
J. A.
, 1998, “
Machinability of Austempered Ductile Iron
,”
Trans. Am. Foundry Soc.
,
98
(
10
), pp.
39
45
.
16.
Ductile Iron Data for Design Engineer
, 2001,
Ductile Iron Society (DIS), Montreal, Canada
.
17.
Trent
,
E. M.
, 1984,
Metal Cutting
,
Tanner Ltd.
,
London
.
18.
Modern Metal Cutting—A Practical Handbook
, 1997,
Sandvik-Coromant Co. Inc.
,
Sweden
.
19.
Die and Mould Design Handbook
, 2000,
Sandvik-Coromant Co. Inc.
,
Sweden
.
20.
Şeker
,
U.
,
Çiftçi
,
İ.
, and
Hasirci
,
H.
, 2003, “
The Effect of Alloying Elements on Surface Roughness and Cutting Forces During Machining of Ductile Iron
,”
Mater. Des.
,
24
, pp.
47
51
.
21.
The Iron Casting Handbook
, 1981,
Iron Casting Society, Inc.
,
Ohio, USA
.
22.
Machining Ductile Irons
, 2001,
International Nickel Co. Inc.
,
New York
.
23.
ASM Handbook
, 1991, Heat Treating, 10th ed., Vol.
4
,
ASM International
,
Ohio, USA
.
24.
Saglam
,
H.
,
Unsacar
,
F.
, and
Yaldiz
,
S.
, 2006, “
Investigation of the Effect of Rake Angle and Approaching Angle on Main Cutting Force and Tool Tip Temperature
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
,
46
, pp.
132
141
.
25.
Saglam
,
H.
,
Yaldiz
,
S.
, and
Unsacar
,
F.
, 2007, “
The Effect of Tool Geometry and Cutting Speed on Main Cutting Force and Tool Tip Temperature
,”
Mater. Des.
,
28
, pp.
101
111
.
26.
Sorelm
, 1990,
Ductile Iron Data for Design Engineer
,
Ductile Iron Society
, pp.
84
155
.
27.
Özçatalbas
,
Y.
, and
Ercan
,
F.
, 2003, “
The Effects of Heat Treatment on the Machinability of Mild Steels
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
,
136
, pp.
227
238
.
28.
Yazman
,
S.
, 2006, “
The Effects of Cutting Parameters on Machining for Austempered Ferritic Ductile Iron
,” (in Turkish) MSc thesis, Selcuk University-Institute of Science and Technology, Konya, Turkey.
29.
Oraby
,
S. E.
, and
Hayhurst
D. R.
, 1991, “
Development of Models for Tool Wear Force Relationships in Metal Cutting
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
,
33
(
2
), pp.
125
138
.
30.
Dubensky
,
W. J.
, and
Rundman
,
K. B.
, 1985, “
An Electron Microscope Study of Carbide Formation in Austempered Ductile Iron
,”
Trans. Am. Foundry Soc.
,
64
(
85
), pp.
389
394
.
31.
Neseli
,
S.
,
Yaldız
,
S.
, and
Türkes
,
E.
, 2011, “
Optimization of Tool Geometry Parameters for Turning Operations Based on the Response Surface Methodology
,”
Measurement
,
44
, pp.
580
587
.
32.
Kwak
,
J. S.
, 2005, “
Application of Taguchi and Response Surface Methodologies for Geometric Error in Surface Grinding Process
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
,
45
, pp.
327
334
.
33.
Bouacha
,
K.
,
Yallese
,
M. A.
,
Mabrouki
,
T.
, and
Rigal
,
J. F.
, 2010, “
Statistical Analysis of Surface Roughness and Cutting Forces Using Response Surface Methodology in Hard Turning of AISI 52100 Bearing Steel With CBN Tool
,”
Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater.
,
28
, pp.
349
361
.
You do not currently have access to this content.