This paper presents the forward position analysis of two planar three degree-of-freedom robots, with all revolute joints, manipulating a single degree-of-freedom closed-loop linkage payload. Kinematic constraint relations are developed which provide geometric insight into the cooperating robot-payload system and are important in the control of the two robots. For illustrative purposes, the payload that is considered here is a planar four-bar linkage. The paper shows that the orientation of a specified link in the payload can be described by a sixth-order polynomial. This polynomial is an important contribution, not only to the kinematics of the cooperating robots, but to the multiple-input closed-loop nine-bar linkage formed by the two robots and the payload. The polynomial contains important information regarding the assembly configurations and the stationary configurations of the system. The paper shows that zero, two, four, or six assembly configurations are possible and that each configuration corresponds to a different circuit of the system. Graphical methods are utilized to provide geometric insight into the assembly and stationary configurations and to check the results obtained from the sixth-order polynomial. A numerical example is included which demonstrates the importance of the polynomial in solving the forward position problem, and in determining the number of assembly configurations.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Linkages, Robots, Polynomials, Manufacturing, Degrees of freedom, Kinematics, Circuits
1.
Angeles, J., and Zanganeh, K. E., 1993, “A Symbolic Approach to the Input-Output Analysis of the Stephenson Six-Bar Linkage,” Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual ASME Design Automation Conference, Albuquerque, NM, Sept. 19–22, DE-Vol. 65-2, pp. 67–72.
2.
Chase
 
T. R.
, and
Mirth
 
J. A.
,
1993
, “
Circuits and Branches of Single-Degree-of-Freedom Planar Linkages
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN
, Vol.
115
, No.
2
, June, pp.
223
–
230
.
3.
Duffy, J., 1994, “Comments on Imaginary Polynomial Roots and the Circle Points at Infinity,” Personal Communication, Sept. 26.
4.
Foulds, R., ed., 1986, Interactive Robotic Aids—One Option for Independent Living: An International Perspective, International Exchange of Experts and Information Rehabilitation, No. 37, World Rehabilitation Fund, Inc., New York, NY.
5.
Hunt, K. H., 1978, Kinematic Geometry of Mechanisms, Clarendon Press, Oxford University, England, pp. 35, 108–110, 194–205, and 384–385.
6.
Koga
 
M.
,
Kosage
 
K.
,
Furata
 
K.
, and
Nosaki
 
K.
,
1992
, “
Coordinated Motion Control of Robot Arms Based on the Virtual Internal Model
,”
IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation
, Vol.
8
, No.
1
, Feb., pp.
77
–
85
.
7.
Laroussi
 
K.
,
Hooshang
 
H.
, and
Goddard
 
R. E.
,
1988
, “
Coordination of Two Planar Robots in Lifting
,”
IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation
, Vol.
4
, No.
1
, Feb., pp.
61
–
70
.
8.
Lin, C. S., and Jia, B. P., 1993, “Application of Linkage Polynomials for Limit Position Determination and Circuit/Branch Rectification,” Proceedings of the Third National Applied Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, Cincinnati, OH, Nov. 7–10, Vol. 1, AMR-93-046, pp. 1–9.
9.
Luh, J. Y. S., and Zheng, Y. F., 1987, “Constrained Relations Between Two Industrial Robots for Motion Control,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, The MIT Press, Vol. 6, No. 3, Fall, pp. 60–70.
10.
Merlet, J-P., 1991, “Symbolic Computation for the Determination of the Minimal Direct Kinematics Polynomial and the Singular Configurations of Parallel Manipulators,” Advances in Robot Kinematics With Emphasis on Symbolic Computation, Stifter, S., and Lenarcic, J., eds., Springer-Verlag Wien, New York, pp. 465–475.
11.
Pennock, G. R., and Sissom, B. J., 1987, “Two Cooperating Planar Robots,” Proceedings of the Tenth OSU Applied Mechanisms Conference, New Orleans, LA, Dec. 6–9, pp. VI.1–VI.4.
12.
Pennock, G. R., and Ryuh, B. S., 1988, “A Dynamic Formulation for Multiple Cooperating Robots Forming Closed Kinematic Chains,” Proceedings of the Eleventh IASTED International Symposium, ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, Santa Barbara, CA, May 25–27, pp. 64–68.
13.
Pennock
 
G. R.
, and
Kassner
 
D. J.
,
1992
, “
Kinematic Analysis of a Planar Eight-Bar Linkage: Application to a Platform-Type Robot
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN
, Vol.
114
, No.
1
, March, pp.
87
–
95
.
14.
Pennock, G. R., and Mattson, K. G., 1994, “A Kinematic Analysis of Two 3-R Robots Manipulating a Planar Linkage Payload,” Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Biennial Mechanisms Conference, Minneapolis, MN, Trans. ASME, DE-Vol. 72, Sept. 11–14, pp. 11–17.
15.
Saltire Software, Inc., 1993, Analytix, Version 3.0 β, Saltire Software, Inc., Beaverton, OR.
16.
Unseren, M. A., 1992, “A Rigid Body Model and Decoupled Control Architecture for Two Manipulators Holding a Complex Object,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Vol. 10, Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 115–131.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1995
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.