This paper addresses the issues of control and workspace determination of planar active tensegrity or tensegritylike structures. The motion of such structures is generally produced by actuated cables, which cannot tolerate compressive forces. Hence, a controller, which not only satisfies the system dynamic equations but also maintains positive tension in cables, is necessary. A null-space controller based on feedback linearization theory is developed for this purpose. This controller utilizes redundant active cables to overactuate the system. The concept of a “dynamic workspace” for these structures is then introduced. This workspace consists of all configurations that are achievable from a given initial configuration while maintaining positive tensions throughout the entire system motion, and it is a powerful tool in analyzing the performance of a variety of tensegrity structures. This idea extends the concept of the static workspace, which consists of statically maintainable configurations, by incorporating system motion and dynamics to guarantee positive tensions during transition between the states. A critical benefit of this procedure is that it may be used to find the dynamic workspace of a system regardless of whether actuator redundancy is utilized, and thus it can be used to objectively illustrate the degree to which overactuation improves mobility of a tensegrity structure. The effectiveness of the developed concepts is demonstrated through computer simulation and actual physical experimentation.

1.
Motro
,
R.
, 2003,
Tensegrity: Structural Systems for the Future
,
Kogan Page Science
,
London
.
2.
Pugh
,
A.
, 1976,
An Introduction to Tensegrity
,
University of California Press
,
Berkeley
.
3.
de Jager
,
B.
, and
Skelton
,
R. E.
, 2005, “
Input-Output Selection for Planar Tensegrity Models
,”
IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol.
1063-6536,
13
(
5
), pp.
778
785
.
4.
de Jager
,
B.
, and
Skelton
,
R. E.
, 2004, “
Symbolic Stiffness Optimization of Planar Tensegrity Structures
,”
J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct.
1045-389X,
15
, pp.
181
193
.
5.
van de Wijdeven
,
J.
, and
de Jager
,
B.
, 2005, “
Shape Change of Tensegrity Structures: Design and Control
,”
Proceedings of ACC 2005
, pp.
2522
2527
.
6.
Arsenault
,
M.
, and
Gosselin
,
C. M.
, 2005, “
Kinematic, Static, and Dynamic Analysis of a Planar One-Degree-of-Freedom Tensegrity Mechanism
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
127
(
6
), pp.
1152
1160
.
7.
Arsenault
,
M.
, and
Gosselin
,
C. M.
, 2006, “
Kinematic, Static, and Dynamic Analysis of a 2-DOF Tensegrity Mechanism
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
0094-114X,
41
(
9
), pp.
1072
1089
.
8.
Aldrich
,
J. B.
, and
Skelton
,
R. E.
, 2003, “
Control/Structure Optimization Approach for Minimum-Time Reconfiguration of Tensegrity Systems
,”
Smart Structures and Materials 2003: Modeling, Signal Processing and Control
,
Proceedings of SPIE
,
R. C.
Smith
, ed., Vol.
5049
, pp.
448
459
.
9.
Aldrich
,
J. B.
,
Skelton
,
R. E.
, and
Kreutz-Delgado
,
K.
, 2003, “
Control Synthesis for a Class of Light and Agile Robotic Tensegrity Structures
,”
Proceedings of ACC 2003
, pp.
5245
5251
.
10.
Pusey
,
J.
,
Fattah
,
A.
,
Agrawal
,
S.
, and
Messina
,
E.
, 2004, “
Design and Workspace Analysis of a 6-6 Cable-Suspended Parallel Robot
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
0094-114X,
39
, pp.
761
778
.
11.
Roberts
,
R. G.
,
Graham
,
T.
, and
Lippitt
,
T.
, 1998, “
On the Inverse Kinematics, Statics, and Fault Tolerance of Cable-Suspended Robots
,”
J. Rob. Syst.
0741-2223,
15
(
10
), pp.
581
597
.
12.
Verhoeven
,
R.
,
Hiller
,
M.
, and
Tadokoro
,
S.
, 1998, “
Workspace of Tendon-Driven Stewart Platforms: Basics, Classification, Details on the Planar 2-DOF Class
,”
Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Motion and Vibration Control
, Vol.
3
, pp.
871
876
.
13.
Verhoeven
,
R.
,
Hiller
,
M.
, and
Tadokoro
,
S.
, 1998, “
Workspace, Stiffness, Singularities and Classification of Tendon-driven Stewart Platforms
,”
Proceedings ARK 1998 Sixth International Symposium on Advances in Robot Kinematics
, pp.
105
114
.
14.
Williams
,
R. L.
, and
Gallina
,
P.
, 2001, “
Planar Cable-Direct-Driven Robots, Part 1: Kinematics and Statics
,”
Proceedings of the 2001 ASME Design Technical Conference, 27th Design Automation Conference
.
15.
Skelton
,
R. E.
,
Williamson
,
D.
, and
Han
,
J.
, 2002, “
Equilibrium Conditions of a Class 1 Tensegrity Structure
,”
Adv. Astronautical Sciences, Spaceflight Mechanics
,
112
, pp.
927
950
.
16.
Williamson
,
D.
,
Skelton
,
R. E.
, and
Han
,
J.
, 2002, “
Equilibrium Conditions of a Tensegrity Structure
,”
Proceedings of the Third World Conference on Structural Control
.
17.
Oh
,
S. R.
, and
Agrawal
,
S. K.
, 2006, “
The Feasible Workspace of a Set Point Controller for a Cable Suspended Robot With Input Constraints and Disturbances
,”
IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol.
1063-6536,
14
(
4
), pp.
735
742
.
18.
Oh
,
S. R.
, and
Agrawal
,
S. K.
, 2006, “
Generation of Feasible Set Points and Control of a Cable Robot
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob.
,
22
(
3
), pp.
551
558
.
19.
Oh
,
S. R.
, and
Agrawal
,
S. K.
, 2005, “
Cable Suspended Planar Robots With Redundant Cables: Controllers With Positive Tensions
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob.
,
21
(
3
), pp.
457
464
.
20.
Tibert
,
A. G.
, and
Pellegrino
,
S.
, 2003, “
Review of Form-Finding Methods for Tensegrity Structures
,”
Int. J. Space Struct.
0956-0599,
18
(
4
), pp.
209
223
.
You do not currently have access to this content.