All areas of engineering have a need to find appropriate aggregated outcomes for systems. Issues range from decision problems, “divide-and-conquer” approaches that include aspects of multidisciplinary design optimization and the effects of a division of labor for, perhaps, a design project, the inefficiencies that can accompany multidisciplinary projects involving, say, design, manufacturing, and sales, to the complexities of multiscale design, analysis, and even nanotechnology. But as shown, if the adopted approach (e.g., management choices, divide-and-conquer methodology, modeling of the biology/physics, decision rule, etc.) satisfies particular accepted practices, then certain complexities and inefficiencies must be anticipated. A disturbing corollary is that even should “success” appear to have been achieved with an approach that satisfies these conditions, it need not be as firm as expected. Ways to improve methodologies must avoid the specified conditions.

1.
Weinan
,
E.
,
Li
,
X.
, and
Vanden-Eijnden
,
E.
, 2004, “
Some Recent Progress in Multiscale Modeling
,”
Notes in Computational Science and Engineering
,
39
, pp.
3
22
.
2.
Arrow
,
K.
, 1951,
Social Choice and Individual Values
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
3.
Hazelrigg
,
G.
, 1996, “
The Implication of Arrow’s Impossibility Theory on Approaches to Optimal Engineering Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
118
, pp.
161
164
.
4.
Franssen
,
M.
, 2005, “
Arrow’s Theorem, Multi-Criteria Decision Problems and Multi-Attribute Preferences in Engineering
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
0934-9839,
16
, pp.
42
56
.
5.
van de Poel
,
I.
, 2007, “
Methodological Problems in QFD and Directions for Future Development
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
0934-9839,
18
, pp.
21
36
.
6.
Wassenaar
,
H.
, and
Chen
,
W.
, 2003, “
An approach to Decision-Based Design With Discrete Choice Analysis for Demand Modeling
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
125
, pp.
490
497
.
7.
Scott
,
M.
, and
Antonsson
,
E.
, 1999, “
Arrow’s Theorem and Engineering Design Decision Making
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
0934-9839,
11
, pp.
218
228
.
8.
Saari
,
D. G.
, 2001,
Decisions and Elections; Expect the Unexpected
,
Cambridge University Press
,
New York
.
9.
Saari
,
D. G.
, 2008,
Disposing Dictators; Demystifying Voting Paradoxes
,
Cambridge University
,
New York
.
10.
Zwicky
,
F.
, 1937, “
On the Masses of Nebulae and of Clusters of Nebulae
,”
Astrophys. J.
0004-637X,
86
, pp.
217
246
.
11.
Li
,
M.
, and
S.
Azarm
, 2008. “
Multiobjective Collaborative Robust Optimization With Interval Uncertainty and Interdisciplinary Uncertainty Propagation
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
130
, p.
081402
.
12.
Sen
,
A.
, 1970, “
The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal
,”
J. Polit. Econ.
0022-3808,
78
(
1
), pp.
152
57
.
13.
Alyaqout
,
S. F.
,
Papalambros
,
P. P.
, and
Ulsoy
,
A. G.
, 2005. “
Quantification and Use of System Coupling in Decomposed Design Optimization Problems
,”
Proceedings of IMECE2005
.
14.
Saari
,
D. G.
, and
Sieberg
,
K.
, 2004, “
Are Part Wise Comparisons Reliable?
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
0934-9839,
15
, pp.
62
71
.
15.
Saari
,
D. G.
, 2010, “
Mathematical Snapshots Motivated by “Dark Matter”
,”
Mathematics and Astronomy: A Joint Long Journey
,
M.
de Leon
, ed.,
American Institute of Physics
,
Melville, NY
.
You do not currently have access to this content.