Consideration set formation using noncompensatory screening rules is a vital component of real purchasing decisions with decades of experimental validation. Marketers have recently developed statistical methods that can estimate quantitative choice models that include consideration set formation via noncompensatory screening rules. But is capturing consideration within models of choice important for design? This paper reports on a simulation study of a vehicle portfolio design when households screen over vehicle body style built to explore the importance of capturing consideration rules for optimal designers. We generate synthetic market share data, fit a variety of discrete choice models to the data, and then optimize design decisions using the estimated models. Model predictive power and design profitability relative to ideal profits are compared as the amount of market data available increases. We find that even when estimated compensatory models provide relatively good predictive accuracy, they can lead to suboptimal design decisions when the population uses consideration behavior; convergence of compensatory models to noncompensatory behavior is likely to require unrealistic amounts of data; and modeling heterogeneity in noncompensatory screening is more valuable than heterogeneity in compensatory tradeoffs. This supports the claim that designers should carefully identify consideration behaviors before optimizing product portfolios. We also find that higher model predictive power does not necessarily imply more profitable design decisions; different model forms can provide “descriptive” rather than “predictive” information that is useful for design.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
July 2015
Research-Article
Should Optimal Designers Worry About Consideration?
W. Ross Morrow
W. Ross Morrow
Analytics Scientist
e-mail: wmorro13@ford.com
Ford Research and Innovation Center Palo Alto
,Palo Alto, CA 94304
e-mail: wmorro13@ford.com
Search for other works by this author on:
Minhua Long
W. Ross Morrow
Analytics Scientist
e-mail: wmorro13@ford.com
Ford Research and Innovation Center Palo Alto
,Palo Alto, CA 94304
e-mail: wmorro13@ford.com
Contributed by the Design Automation Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received April 18, 2014; final manuscript received March 19, 2015; published online May 19, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Wei Chen.
J. Mech. Des. Jul 2015, 137(7): 071411 (9 pages)
Published Online: July 1, 2015
Article history
Received:
April 18, 2014
Revision Received:
March 19, 2015
Online:
May 19, 2015
Citation
Long, M., and Ross Morrow, W. (July 1, 2015). "Should Optimal Designers Worry About Consideration?." ASME. J. Mech. Des. July 2015; 137(7): 071411. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030178
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
DeepJEB: 3D Deep Learning-Based Synthetic Jet Engine Bracket Dataset
J. Mech. Des (April 2025)
Design and Justice: A Scoping Review in Engineering Design
J. Mech. Des (May 2025)
Related Articles
Exploring Product Solution Differences Due to Choice Model Selection in the Presence of Noncompensatory Decisions With Conjunctive Screening Rules
J. Mech. Des (February,2017)
Engineering Product Design Optimization for Retail Channel Acceptance
J. Mech. Des (June,2008)
Latent Customer Needs Elicitation by Use Case Analogical Reasoning From Sentiment Analysis of Online Product Reviews
J. Mech. Des (July,2015)
Implications of Context Effects in Consumer Utility Models for Optimal Product Design and Differentiation
J. Mech. Des (September,2024)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Digital Human in Engineering and Bioengineering Applications
Advances in Computers and Information in Engineering Research, Volume 1
QRAS Approach to Phased Mission Analysis (PSAM-0444)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Utility Function Fundamentals
Decision Making in Engineering Design