In engineering design optimization, evaluation of a single solution (design) often requires running one or more computationally expensive simulations. Surrogate assisted optimization (SAO) approaches have long been used for solving such problems, in which approximations/surrogates are used in lieu of computationally expensive simulations during the course of search. Existing SAO approaches often use the same type of approximation model to represent all objectives and constraints in all regions of the search space. The selection of a type of surrogate model over another is nontrivial and an a priori choice limits flexibility in representation. In this paper, we introduce a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (EA) with multiple adaptive spatially distributed surrogates. Instead of a single global surrogate, local surrogates of multiple types are constructed in the neighborhood of each offspring solution and a multi-objective search is conducted using the best surrogate for each objective and constraint function. The proposed approach offers flexibility of representation by capitalizing on the benefits offered by various types of surrogates in different regions of the search space. The approach is also immune to illvalidation since approximated and truly evaluated solutions are not ranked together. The performance of the proposed surrogate assisted multi-objective algorithm (SAMO) is compared with baseline nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) and NSGA-II embedded with global and local surrogates of various types. The performance of the proposed approach is quantitatively assessed using several engineering design optimization problems. The numerical experiments demonstrate competence and consistency of SAMO.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2016
Research-Article
Multi-Objective Optimization With Multiple Spatially Distributed Surrogates
Kalyan Shankar Bhattacharjee,
Kalyan Shankar Bhattacharjee
School of Engineering and IT,
The University of New South Wales,
Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
e-mail: k.bhattacharjee@student.adfa.edu.au
The University of New South Wales,
Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
e-mail: k.bhattacharjee@student.adfa.edu.au
Search for other works by this author on:
Hemant Kumar Singh,
Hemant Kumar Singh
School of Engineering and IT,
The University of New South Wales,
Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
e-mail: h.singh@adfa.edu.au
The University of New South Wales,
Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
e-mail: h.singh@adfa.edu.au
Search for other works by this author on:
Tapabrata Ray
Tapabrata Ray
School of Engineering and IT,
The University of New South Wales,
Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
e-mail: t.ray@adfa.edu.au
The University of New South Wales,
Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
e-mail: t.ray@adfa.edu.au
Search for other works by this author on:
Kalyan Shankar Bhattacharjee
School of Engineering and IT,
The University of New South Wales,
Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
e-mail: k.bhattacharjee@student.adfa.edu.au
The University of New South Wales,
Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
e-mail: k.bhattacharjee@student.adfa.edu.au
Hemant Kumar Singh
School of Engineering and IT,
The University of New South Wales,
Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
e-mail: h.singh@adfa.edu.au
The University of New South Wales,
Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
e-mail: h.singh@adfa.edu.au
Tapabrata Ray
School of Engineering and IT,
The University of New South Wales,
Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
e-mail: t.ray@adfa.edu.au
The University of New South Wales,
Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
e-mail: t.ray@adfa.edu.au
Contributed by the Design Automation Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received December 12, 2015; final manuscript received June 25, 2016; published online July 18, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Gary Wang.
J. Mech. Des. Sep 2016, 138(9): 091401 (10 pages)
Published Online: July 18, 2016
Article history
Received:
December 12, 2015
Revised:
June 25, 2016
Citation
Shankar Bhattacharjee, K., Kumar Singh, H., and Ray, T. (July 18, 2016). "Multi-Objective Optimization With Multiple Spatially Distributed Surrogates." ASME. J. Mech. Des. September 2016; 138(9): 091401. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034035
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
Multiple Surrogate-Assisted Many-Objective Optimization for Computationally Expensive Engineering Design
J. Mech. Des (May,2018)
Sequential Multi-Objective Optimization for Lubrication System of Gasoline Engines With Bilevel Optimization Structure
J. Mech. Des (February,2017)
An Adaptive Two-Stage Kriging-Based Infilling Strategy for Efficient Multi-Objective Global Optimization
J. Mech. Des (November,2022)
Multi-Objective Optimization for High-Dimensional Expensively Constrained Black-Box Problems
J. Mech. Des (November,2021)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
A Learning-Based Adaptive Routing for QoS-Aware Data Collection in Fixed Sensor Networks with Mobile Sinks
Intelligent Engineering Systems through Artificial Neural Networks, Volume 20
A Collaborative Framework for Distributed Multiobjective Combinatorial Optimization
International Conference on Computer and Computer Intelligence (ICCCI 2011)
Multi-Objective Optimization of Power Plant Maintenance Projects Based on NSGA-II
International Conference on Computer Technology and Development, 3rd (ICCTD 2011)