When teaching sustainable design in industry or academia, we should teach design methods, activities, and mindsets that are most effective at driving real change in a industry. However, most studies of design practices are performed on students, not on professionals. How strongly do student perceptions of value predict those of industry teams designing real products? This study provided workshops on three sustainable design methods (The Natural Step, Whole System Mapping, and Biomimicry) for 172 professionals and 204 students, applying the methods to their actual products being developed. It surveyed both populations about which activities or mindsets within each design method provided sustainability value, innovation value, and overall value. Quantitatively, student results did not strongly predict professional opinions; professionals chose clearer favorites and valued more things. However, qualitatively, student results did predict the reasons why professionals would value the design activities and mindsets. Therefore, care should be taken to choose appropriate participants for the questions being asked in sustainable design research.
Issue Section:
Design Education
References
1.
Deutz
, P.
, McGuire
, M.
, and Neighbour
, G.
, 2013
, “Eco-Design Practice in the Context of a Structured Design Process: An Interdisciplinary Empirical Study of UK Manufacturers
,” J. Clean. Prod.
, 39
, pp. 117
–128
. 2.
Lofthouse
, V.
, 2003
, “Designing for Designers-Ecodesign Tools to Inform and Inspire
,” IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment
, pp. 377
–382
.3.
Vidal
, R.
, Mulet
, E.
, and Gómez-Senent
, E.
, 2004
, “Effectiveness of the Means of Expression in Creative Problem-Solving in Design Groups
,” J. Eng. Des.
, 15
(3
), pp. 285
–298
. 4.
Lu
, C.-C.
, 2015
, “The Relationship between Student Design Cognition Types and Creative Design Outcomes
,” Des. Stud.
, 36
, pp. 59
–76
. 5.
Tromp
, N.
, and Hekkert
, P.
, 2016
, “Assessing Methods for Effect-Driven Design: Evaluation of a Social Design Method
,” Des. Stud.
, 43
, pp. 24
–47
. 6.
Bierhals
, R.
, Schuster
, I.
, Kohler
, P.
, and Badke-Schaub
, P.
, 2007
, “Shared Mental Models—Linking Team Cognition and Performance
,” CoDesign
, 3
(1
), pp. 75
–94
. 7.
Radcliffe
, D. F.
, and Lee
, T. Y.
, 1989
, “Design Methods Used by Undergraduate Engineering Students
,” Des. Stud.
, 10
(4
), pp. 199
–207
. 8.
Daalhuizen
, J.
, Person
, O.
, and Gattol
, V.
, 2014
, “A Personal Matter? An Investigation of Students’ Design Process Experiences When Using a Heuristic or a Systematic Method
,” Des. Stud.
, 35
(2
), pp. 133
–159
. 9.
Ramani
, K.
, Ramanujan
, D.
, Bernstein
, W. Z.
, Zhao
, F.
, Sutherland
, J.
, Handwerker
, C.
, Choi
, J.-K.
, Kim
, H.
, and Thurston
, D.
, 2010
, “Integrated Sustainable Life Cycle Design: A Review
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 132
(9
), p. 15
. 10.
Smith
, R. P.
, and Leong
, A.
, 1998
, “An Observational Study of Design Team Process: A Comparison of Student and Professional Engineers
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 120
(4
), pp. 636
–642
. 11.
Cash
, P. J.
, Hicks
, B. J.
, and Culley
, S. J.
, 2013
, “A Comparison of Designer Activity Using Core Design Situations in the Laboratory and Practice
,” Des. Stud.
, 34
(5
), pp. 575
–611
. 12.
Gonçalves
, M.
, Cardoso
, C.
, and Badke-Schaub
, P.
, 2014
, “What Inspires Designers? Preferences on Inspirational Approaches during Idea Generation
,” Des. Stud.
, 35
(1
), pp. 29
–53
. 13.
Ahmed
, S.
, and Christensen
, B. T.
, 2009
, “An in Situ Study of Analogical Reasoning in Novice and Experienced Design Engineers
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 131
(11
), p. 111004
. 14.
Bailey
, R.
, 2007
, “Effects of Industrial Experience and Coursework During Sophomore and Junior Years on Student Learning of Engineering Design
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 129
(7
), pp. 662
–667
. 15.
Viswanathan
, V. K.
, and Linsey
, J. S.
, 2013
, “Design Fixation and Its Mitigation: A Study on the Role of Expertise
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 135
(5
), p. 051008
. 16.
Blessing
, L.
, and Seering
, W.
, 2016
, “Preparing for the Transfer of Research Results to Practice: Best Practice Heuristics
,” Impact of Design Research on Industrial Practice
, Springer
, New York
, pp. 3
–21
.17.
Rittel
, H. W. J.
, and Webber
, M. M.
, 1973
, “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning
,” Policy Sci.
, 4
(2
), pp. 155
–169
. 18.
Page
, S. E.
, 2014
, “Where Diversity Comes from and Why It Matters?
,” Eur. J. Soc. Psychol.
, 44
(4
), pp. 267
–279
. 19.
Santolaria
, M.
, Oliver-Solà
, J.
, Gasol
, C. M.
, Morales-Pinzón
, T.
, and Rieradevall
, J.
, 2011
, “Eco-Design in Innovation Driven Companies: Perception, Predictions and the Main Drivers of Integration. The Spanish Example
,” J. Clean. Prod.
, 19
(12
), pp. 1315
–1323
. 20.
Häggman
, A.
, Tsai
, G.
, Elsen
, C.
, Honda
, T.
, and Yang
, M. C.
, 2015
, “Connections Between the Design Tool, Design Attributes, and User Preferences in Early Stage Design
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 137
(7
), p. 071408
. 21.
Jensen
, T. E.
, and Andreasen
, M. M.
, 2010
, “Design Methods In Practice—Beyond The ‘Systematic Approach’ of Pahl & Beitz
,” DS 60: Proceedings of the 11th International Design Conference DESIGN 2010
, Dubrovnik, Croatia
.22.
Homans
, G. C.
, 1949
, “The Strategy of Industrial Sociology
,” Am. J. Sociol.
, 54
(4
), pp. 330
–337
. 23.
Robèrt
, K.-H.
, 1991
, “Educating A Nation: The Natural Step
,” Context 28, pp. 10
–15
.24.
Baxter
, K.
, Boisvert
, A.
, Lindberg
, C.
, and Mackrael
, K.
, 2009
, “Sustainability Primer: Step By Natural Step
,” The Natural Step Canada
.25.
Faludi
, J.
, and Danby
, D.
, 2010
, “Introduction to Whole Systems Design Companion to the Video: Script and Illustrations
,” Autodesk Sustainability Workshop
. Accessed July 21, 2016. http://sustainabilityworkshop.autodesk.com/sites/default/files/core-chapter-files/wholesystemsdesign_videoscript.pdf26.
Faludi
, J.
, 2015
, “A Sustainable Design Method Acting as an Innovation Tool,” ICoRD’15–Research into Design Across Boundaries
, Vol. 2
, Springer
, New York
, pp. 201
–212
.27.
Benyus
, J. M.
, 1997
, Biomimicry
, William Morrow
, New York
.28.
Baumeister
, D.
, Tocke
, R.
, Dwyer
, J.
, Ritter
, S.
, and Benyus
, J.
, 2013
, Biomimicry Resource Handbook: A Seed Bank of Best Practices, 2013 ed.
, Biomimicry 3.8
, Missoula, MT
.29.
Baumeister
, D.
, Tocke
, R.
, Dwyer
, J.
, Ritter
, S.
, and Benyus
, J.
, 2008
, Biomimicry Resource Handbook: A Seed Bank of Best Practices, 2008 ed.
, Biomimicry 3.8
, Missoula, MT
.30.
Faludi
, J.
, and Menter
, A.
, 2011
, “Doing Biomimicry: Finding Mentors in Nature
,” Autodesk Sustainability Workshop
. http://sustainabilityworkshop.autodesk.com/sites/default/files/core-chapter-files/wholesystemsdesign_videoscript.pdfAccessed July 21, 2016.31.
Hawken
, P.
, Lovins
, A. B.
, and Lovins
, L. H.
, 2013
, Natural Capitalism: The next Industrial Revolution
, Routledge
, Boston
.32.
Faludi
, J.
, 2017
, “Recommending Sustainable Design Methods And Combinations By Characterizing Activities And Mindsets
,” Int. J. Sustain. Des.
, 3
(2
), pp. 100
–136
. 33.
Faludi
, J.
, 2017
, “What Green Design Activities and Mindsets Drive Innovation and Sustainability In Student Teams?
,” 21st International Conference on Engineering Design
, Vancouver, Canada,
Aug. 21–25
.34.
Faludi
, J.
, 2017
, “Golden Tools in Green Design: What Drives Sustainability, Innovation, and Value in Green Design Methods?
,” Ph.D. thesis, UC Berkeley
, Berkeley
.35.
Creswell
, J. W.
, 2013
, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches
, Sage Publications
, Thousand Oaks, CA
.36.
Blessing
, L. T.
, and Chakrabarti
, A.
, 2009
, DRM: A Design Research Methodology
, Springer
, Berlin
.37.
Agresti
, A.
, and Coull
, B. A.
, 1998
, “Approximate Is Better than ‘Exact’ for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions
,” Am. Stat.
, 52
(2
), pp. 119
–126
. 38.
Bonett
, D. G.
, and Price
, R. M.
, 2012
, “Adjusted Wald Confidence Interval for a Difference of Binomial Proportions Based on Paired Data
,” J. Educ. Behav. Stat.
, 37
(4
), pp. 479
–488
. Copyright © 2019 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.
