Abstract

Functional analysis aims to decompose the main functions of a product, which can be large and complex, into more manageable subfunctions. Recently, interest in explicitly considering users during functional modeling has grown to enhance analysis completeness, but how this addresses some commonly reported challenges for novice engineers is not clear. This research proposes and assesses a simple way to streamline user considerations in functional analysis as potential mitigation for some challenges (i.e., difficulty in identifying functions to explore design space and expressing the functions with expected syntax and solution neutrality) that novice designers frequently mention at the early design stage. Analysis of the results indicates that embedding requirements into a user workflow supports novice designers generate significantly more functions with correct syntax than starting with requirements only. In addition, the exploration space is prominently broader, especially at the higher levels measured by the geometry of the generated hierarchical models. These results suggest that strategically incorporating user considerations, even in a simple way, positively addresses the common challenges. This initial exploration and assessment could serve as an inspiration for future research on more efficient ways to streamline the functional decomposition process and, in turn, better support subsequent systematic conceptual design.

References

1.
Ulrich
,
K. T.
,
Eppinger
,
S. D.
, and
Yang
,
M. C.
,
2020
,
Product Design and Development
, 7th ed.,
McGraw Hill
.
2.
Pahl
,
G.
, and
Beitz
,
W.
,
1988
,
Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach
,
Design Council
,
London
.
3.
Le Masson
,
P.
, and
Weil
,
B.
,
2013
, “
Design Theories As Languages of the Unknown: Insights From the German Roots of Systematic Design (1840–1960)
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
,
24
(
2
), pp.
105
126
.
4.
Liu
,
A.
, and
Lu
,
S.
,
2020
, “
Functional Design Framework for Innovative Design Thinking in Product Development
,”
CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol.
,
30
, pp.
105
117
.
5.
Murphy
,
A. R.
,
Ingram
,
H. E.
,
Nelson
,
J. T.
,
Bohm
,
M. R.
,
Linsey
,
J. S.
, and
Nagel
,
R. L.
,
2019
, “
An Update to a Functional Modeling Scoring Rubric With Overall and Question-Level Inter-Rater Reliability
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
141
(
8
), p.
084501
.
6.
Summers
,
J. D.
,
Eckert
,
C.
, and
Goel
,
A. K.
,
2017
, “
Function in Engineering: Benchmarking Representations and Models
,”
Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf.
,
31
(
4
), pp.
401
412
.
7.
Björklund
,
T. A.
,
2013
, “
Initial Mental Representations of Design Problems: Differences Between Experts and Novices
,”
Des. Stud.
,
34
(
2
), pp.
135
160
.
8.
Stone
,
R. B.
, and
Wood
,
K. L.
,
2000
, “
Development of a Functional Basis for Design
,” ASME
J. Mech. Des.
,
122
(
4
), pp.
359
370
.
9.
Hirtz
,
J.
,
Stone
,
R. B.
,
McAdams
,
D. A.
,
Szykman
,
S.
, and
Wood
,
K. L.
,
2002
, “
A Functional Basis for Engineering Design: Reconciling and Evolving Previous Efforts
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
,
13
(
2
), pp.
65
82
.
10.
Nagel
,
R. L.
,
Bohm
,
M. R.
, and
Linsey
,
J. S.
,
2013
, “
An Investigation Into the Effectiveness of an Algorithmic Approach to Teaching Functional Modeling
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference
,
Portland, OR
,
Aug. 4-7
.
11.
Ciavola
,
B. T.
,
Wu
,
C.
, and
Gershenson
,
J. K.
,
2015
, “
Integrating Function- and Affordance-Based Design Representations
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
137
(
5
), p.
051101
.
12.
Caldwell
,
B. W.
,
Thomas
,
J. E.
,
Sen
,
C.
,
Mocko
,
G. M.
, and
Summers
,
J. D.
,
2012
, “
The Effects of Language and Pruning on Function Structure Interpretability
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
134
(
6
), p.
061001
.
13.
Sangelkar
,
S.
,
Cowen
,
N.
, and
McAdams
,
D.
,
2012
, “
User Activity—Product Function Association Based Design Rules for Universal Products
,”
Des. Stud.
,
33
(
1
), pp.
85
110
.
14.
Soria Zurita
,
N. F.
,
Stone
,
R. B.
,
Onan Demirel
,
H.
, and
Tumer
,
I. Y.
,
2020
, “
Identification of Human–System Interaction Errors During Early Design Stages Using a Functional Basis Framework
,”
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part B Mech. Eng.
,
6
(
1
), p.
011005
.
15.
Knisely
,
B. M.
, and
Vaughn-Cooke
,
M.
,
2022
, “
Accessibility Versus Feasibility: Optimizing Function Allocation for Accommodation of Heterogeneous Populations
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
144
(
3
), p.
031405
.
16.
Beek
,
T. V.
, and
Tomiyama
,
T.
,
2010
, “Workflow Modelling of Intended System Use,”
Views on Evolvability of Embedded Systems
,
P.
van de Laar
and
T.
Punter
, eds.,
Springer
,
Dordrecht
, pp.
153
170
.
17.
Eisenbart
,
B.
,
Gericke
,
K.
,
Blessing
,
L. T. M.
, and
McAloone
,
T. C.
,
2017
, “
A DSM-Based Framework for Integrated Function Modelling: Concept, Application and Evaluation
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
,
28
(
1
), pp.
25
51
.
18.
Nagel
,
R. L.
, and
Bohm
,
M. R.
,
2011
, “
On Teaching Functionality and Functional Modeling in an Engineering Curriculum
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference
,
Washington, DC
,
Aug. 28–31
, pp.
625
636
.
19.
Booth
,
J. W.
,
Reid
,
T. N.
,
Eckert
,
C.
, and
Ramani
,
K.
,
2015
, “
Comparing Functional Analysis Methods for Product Dissection Tasks
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
137
(
8
), p.
081101
.
20.
Yildirim
,
U.
,
Campean
,
F.
, and
Williams
,
H.
,
2017
, “
Function Modeling Using the System State Flow Diagram
,”
AI EDAM
,
31
(
4
), pp.
413
435
.
21.
Van Eck
,
D.
, and
Weber
,
E.
,
2021
, “
Assessing Function Modeling Frameworks: Technical Advantage Predictions As a Conceptual Tool
,”
Eng. Stud.
,
13
(
3
), pp.
205
225
.
22.
Kirschman
,
C. F.
, and
Fadel
,
G. M.
,
1998
, “
Classifying Functions for Mechanical Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
120
(
3
), pp.
475
482
.
23.
Erden
,
M. S.
,
Komoto
,
H.
,
Van Beek
,
T. J.
,
D'Amelio
,
V.
,
Echavarria
,
E.
, and
Tomiyama
,
T.
,
2008
, “
A Review of Function Modeling: Approaches and Applications
,”
Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf.
,
22
(
2
), pp.
147
169
.
24.
Gericke
,
K.
, and
Eisenbart
,
B.
,
2017
, “
The Integrated Function Modeling Framework and Its Relation to Function Structures
,”
AI EDAM
,
31
(
4
), pp.
436
457
.
25.
Pahl
,
G.
,
Beitz
,
W.
,
Feldhusen
,
J.
, and
Grote
,
K. H.
,
2007
,
Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach
, 3rd ed.,
Springer
,
London
.
26.
Suh
,
N. P.
,
1990
,
The Principles of Design
,
Oxford University Press
,
New York
.
27.
Booth
,
J. W.
,
Bhasin
,
A. K.
,
Reid
,
T.
, and
Ramani
,
K.
,
2014
, “
Evaluating the Bottom-Up Method for Functional Decomposition in Product Dissection Tasks
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference
,
Buffalo, NY
,
Aug. 17–20
.
28.
Deng
,
Y.-M.
,
2002
, “
Function and Behavior Representation in Conceptual Mechanical Design
,”
AI EDAM
,
16
(
5
), pp.
343
362
.
29.
Babaeizadeh Malmiry
,
R.
,
Dantan
,
J.-Y.
,
Pailhes
,
J.
,
Antoine
,
J.-F.
, and
Pailhès
,
J.
,
2016
, “
A Product Functional Modelling Approach Based on the Energy Flow by Using Characteristics-Properties Modelling
,”
J. Eng. Des.
,
27
(
12
), pp.
817
843
.
30.
Nagel
,
R. L.
,
Bohm
,
M. R.
,
Linsey
,
J. S.
, and
Riggs
,
M. K.
,
2015
, “
Improving Students’ Functional Modeling Skills: A Modeling Approach and a Scoring Rubric
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
137
(
5
), p.
051102
.
31.
Patel
,
A.
,
Kramer
,
W. S.
,
Flynn
,
M.
,
Summers
,
J. D.
, and
Shuffler
,
M. L.
,
2020
, “
Function Modeling: A Modeling Behavior Analysis of Pause Patterns
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
142
(
11
), p.
111402
.
32.
Patel
,
A.
, and
Summers
,
J. D.
,
2021
, “
Exploring the Effects of Individual Differences in Function Structure Modeling Behaviors
,”
ASME 2021 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Virtual
,
Aug. 17–19
.
33.
Eisenbart
,
B.
,
Gericke
,
K.
, and
Blessing
,
L. T. M.
,
2016
, “
Taking a Look at the Utilisation of Function Models in Interdisciplinary Design: Insights From Ten Engineering Companies
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
,
28
(
3
), pp.
299
331
.
34.
Tomiyama
,
T.
,
Van Beek
,
T. J.
,
Cabrera
,
A. A. A.
,
Komoto
,
H.
, and
D’Amelio
,
V.
,
2013
, “
Making Function Modeling Practically Usable
,”
AI EDAM
,
27
(
3
), pp.
301
309
.
35.
Fiorineschi
,
L.
,
Frillici
,
F. S.
, and
Rotini
,
F.
,
2018
, “
Enhancing Functional Decomposition and Morphology With TRIZ: Literature Review
,”
Comput. Ind.
,
94
, pp.
1
15
.
36.
Jansson
,
D. G.
, and
Smith
,
S. M.
,
1991
, “
Design Fixation
,”
Des. Stud.
,
12
(
1
), pp.
3
11
.
37.
Atilola
,
O.
,
Tomko
,
M.
, and
Linsey
,
J. S.
,
2016
, “
The Effects of Representation on Idea Generation and Design Fixation: A Study Comparing Sketches and Function Trees
,”
Des. Stud.
,
42
, pp.
110
136
.
38.
Eckert
,
C.
,
Alink
,
T.
,
Ruckpaul
,
A.
, and
Albers
,
A.
,
2011
, “
Different Notions of Function: Results From an Experiment on the Analysis of an Existing Product
,”
J. Eng. Des.
,
22
(
11–12
), pp.
811
837
.
39.
Leenders
,
R. T. A. J.
,
Van Engelen
,
J. M. L.
, and
Kratzer
,
J.
,
2007
, “
Systematic Design Methods and the Creative Performance of New Product Teams: Do They Contradict or Complement Each Other?
,”
J. Prod. Innov. Manage.
,
24
(
2
), pp.
166
179
.
40.
Eckert
,
C.
,
Ruckpaul
,
A.
,
Alink
,
T.
, and
Albers
,
A.
,
2012
, “
Variations in Functional Decomposition for an Existing Product: Experimental Results
,”
AI EDAM
,
26
(
2
), pp.
107
128
.
41.
Harte
,
R.
,
Quinlan
,
L. R.
,
Glynn
,
L.
,
Rodríguez-Molinero
,
A.
,
Baker
,
P. M. A.
,
Scharf
,
T.
, and
Ólaighin
,
G.
,
2017
, “
Human-Centered Design Study: Enhancing the Usability of a Mobile Phone App in an Integrated Falls Risk Detection System for Use by Older Adult Users
,”
JMIR mHealth uHealth
,
5
(
5
), p.
e71
.
42.
Chammas
,
A.
,
Quaresma
,
M.
, and
Mont’Alvão
,
C.
,
2015
, “
A Closer Look on the User Centred Design
,”
Procedia Manuf.
,
3
, pp.
5397
5404
.
43.
Eisenbart
,
B.
,
Gericke
,
K.
, and
Blessing
,
L.
,
2013
, “
An Analysis of Functional Modeling Approaches Across Disciplines
,”
Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf.
,
27
(
3
), pp.
281
289
.
44.
Fahl
,
J.
,
Hirschter
,
T.
,
Haag
,
S.
,
Staiger
,
T.
, and
Albers
,
A.
,
2020
, “
Functions in the Early Phase of Product Development: A Systematic Literature Review
,”
Sixth IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (IEEE ISSE)
,
Virtual
,
Oct. 12–Nov. 12
.
45.
Chakrabarti
,
A.
, and
Blessing
,
L.
,
1996
, “
Special Issue: Representing Functionality in Design
,”
AI EDAM
,
10
(
4
), pp.
251
253
.
46.
van Eck
,
D.
,
2010
, “
On the Conversion of Functional Models: Bridging Differences Between Functional Taxonomies in the Modeling of User Actions
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
,
21
(
2
), pp.
99
111
.
47.
Ramachandran
,
R.
,
2011
,
Understanding the Role of Functions and Interaction in the Product Design
,
Clemson University
,
Clemson, SC
.
48.
Caldwell
,
B. W.
,
Ramachandran
,
R.
, and
Mocko
,
G. M.
,
2013
, “
Assessing the Use of Function Models and Interaction Models Through Concept Sketching
,”
International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Chicago, IL
,
Aug. 12–15
, Vol. 7, pp.
633
646
.
49.
Yildirim
,
U.
, and
Campean
,
F.
,
2020
, “
Functional Modelling of Complex Multi-Disciplinary Systems Using the Enhanced Sequence Diagram
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
,
31
(
4
), pp.
429
448
.
50.
Cohen
,
J.
,
1988
,
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
,
L. Erlbaum Associates
,
Hillsdale, NJ.
51.
Faul
,
F.
,
Erdfelder
,
E.
,
Lang
,
A. G.
, and
Buchner
,
A.
,
2007
, “
G*Power 3: A Flexible Statistical Power Analysis Program for the Social, Behavioral, and Biomedical Sciences
,”
Behav. Res. Methods
,
39
(
2
), pp.
175
191
.
52.
Lakens
,
D.
,
2022
, “
Sample Size Justification
,”
Collabra Psychol.
,
8
(
1
), p.
33267
.
53.
Thomas
,
D. R.
,
2006
, “
A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data
,”
Am. J. Eval.
,
27
(
2
), pp.
237
246
.
54.
Belanger
,
E.
,
Bartels
,
C.
, and
She
,
J.
,
2021
, “
Challenges and Strategies in Remote Design Collaboration During Pandemic: A Case Study in Engineering Education
,”
ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conference
,
Virtual
,
Aug. 17–19
, pp.
1
12
.
55.
Booth
,
J. W.
,
Bhasin
,
A. K.
,
Reid
,
T. N.
, and
Ramani
,
K.
,
2015
, “
Empirical Studies of Functional Decomposition in Early Design
,”
ASME 2015 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Boston, MA
,
Aug. 2–5
.
56.
Guo
,
X.
,
Liu
,
Y.
,
Zhao
,
W.
,
Wang
,
J.
, and
Chen
,
L.
,
2021
, “
Supporting Resilient Conceptual Design Using Functional Decomposition and Conflict Resolution
,”
Adv. Eng. Inf.
,
48
, p.
101262
.
57.
Seshadri
,
P.
,
Reid
,
T. N.
, and
Booth
,
J. W.
,
2014
, “
A Framework for Fostering Compassionate Design Thinking During the Design Process
,”
ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
,
Indianapolis, IN
,
June 15–18
.
58.
Booth
,
J. W.
,
Reid
,
T.
, and
Ramani
,
K.
,
2013
, “
Understanding Abstraction in Design: A Comparison of Three Functional Analysis Methods for Product Dissection
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference
,
Portland, OR
,
Aug. 4–7
.
59.
Cross
,
N.
,
2004
, “
Expertise in Design: An Overview
,”
Des. Stud.
,
25
(
5
), pp.
427
441
.
You do not currently have access to this content.