Abstract

In recent years, academic researchers and engineers in the industry have widely recognized the necessity of integrating remanufacturing considerations into product design iterations to advance sustainability objectives. Acknowledging the importance of design for remanufacturing (DfRem), efforts were made to develop tools and guidelines that could be implemented in practice. However, such methods largely rely upon experiential insights and qualitative assessments, leaving a gap in the ability to quantitatively assess the economic and environmental impacts of design choices. To bridge this gap, we investigate existing efforts and present a framework for DfRem that integrates established design and remanufacturing practices into a cohesive workflow with quantitative assessments. To demonstrate its efficacy for making practical design changes for remanufacturing, we apply the framework to a hydraulic manifold in a transmission system for heavy-duty tractors. Through this industry-relevant case study, we focus on showcasing the practical utility of our framework. Based on the identified design modifications from remanufacturability analysis, we estimate the reductions in life cycle costs, energy consumption, and emissions. Afterward, the modifications are tested using physical experiments with plans for integration into future iterations of the hydraulic manifold design and production. We anticipate this framework can illustrate the process of remanufacturing that ensures improvements in sustainability while maintaining performance and reliability standards.

References

1.
Behtash
,
M.
,
Liu
,
X.
,
Davied
,
M.
,
Thompson
,
T.
,
Burjes
,
R.
,
Lee
,
M.
,
Wang
,
P.
, and
Hu
,
C.
,
2024
, “
Reman Co-Design: A Combined Design and Remanufacturing Optimization Framework for the Sustainable Design of High-Value Components
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
146
(
2
), p.
020901
.
2.
Hilton
,
B.
, and
Thurston
,
M.
,
2019
, “
Design for Remanufacturing
,”
Remanufacturing in the Circular Economy: Operations, Engineering and Logistics
, pp.
137
168
.
3.
Yang
,
S.
,
Ong
,
S.
, and
Nee
,
A.
,
2016
, “
A Decision Support Tool for Product Design for Remanufacturing
,”
Proc. CIRP
,
40
, pp.
144
149
.
4.
Ijomah
,
W. L.
,
2009
, “
Addressing Decision Making for Remanufacturing Operations and Design-for-Remanufacture
,”
Int. J. Sustainable Eng.
,
2
(
2
), pp.
91
102
.
5.
Liu
,
X.
,
Ghosh
,
S.
,
Liu
,
Y.
, and
Wang
,
P.
,
2022
, “
Towards Integrated Design and Operation of Complex Engineering Systems With Predictive Modeling: State-of-the-Art and Challenges
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
144
(
9
), p.
090801
.
6.
Liu
,
X.
, and
Wang
,
P.
,
2024
, “
Integrated Sustainable Product Design With Warranty and End-of-Use Considerations
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
146
(
5
), p.
051705
.
7.
Kim
,
J.
,
Park
,
S.
, and
Kim
,
H. M.
,
2022
, “
Optimal Modular Remanufactured Product Configuration and Harvesting Planning for End-of-Life Products
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
144
(
4
), p.
042001
.
8.
Kim
,
J.
,
Saidani
,
M.
, and
Kim
,
H. M.
,
2021
, “
Designing an Optimal Modular-Based Product Family Under Intellectual Property and Sustainability Considerations
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
143
(
11
), p.
112002
.
9.
Li
,
M.
,
Nemani
,
V. P.
,
Liu
,
J.
,
Lee
,
M. A.
,
Ahmed
,
N.
,
Kremer
,
G. E.
, and
Hu
,
C.
,
2021
, “
Reliability-Informed Life Cycle Warranty Cost and Life Cycle Analysis of Newly Manufactured and Remanufactured Units
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
143
(
11
), p.
112001
.
10.
Nemani
,
V. P.
,
Liu
,
J.
,
Ahmed
,
N.
,
Cartwright
,
A.
,
Kremer
,
G. E.
, and
Hu
,
C.
,
2022
, “
Reliability-Informed Economic and Energy Evaluation for Bi-Level Design for Remanufacturing: A Case Study of Transmission and Hydraulic Manifold
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
144
(
8
), p.
082001
.
11.
Zhang
,
X.
,
Zhang
,
S.
,
Zhang
,
L.
, and
Qiu
,
L.
,
2021
, “
Reverse Design for Remanufacture Based on Failure Feedback and Polychromatic Sets
,”
J. Clean. Prod.
,
295
, p.
126355
.
12.
Zhang
,
X.
,
Zhang
,
S.
,
Zhang
,
L.
,
Xue
,
J.
,
Sa
,
R.
, and
Liu
,
H.
,
2019
, “
Identification of Product’s Design Characteristics for Remanufacturing Using Failure Modes Feedback and Quality Function Deployment
,”
J. Clean. Prod.
,
239
, p.
117967
.
13.
Lindkvist Haziri
,
L.
, and
Sundin
,
E.
,
2020
, “
Supporting Design for Remanufacturing-A Framework for Implementing Information Feedback From Remanufacturing to Product Design
,”
J. Remanuf.
,
10
(
1
), pp.
57
76
.
14.
Moubray
,
J.
,
1997
,
Reliability-Centered Maintenance
,
Industrial Press Inc
,
New York
.
15.
Rausand
,
M.
, and
Hoyland
,
A.
,
2003
,
System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications
,
John Wiley & Sons
,
Hoboken, NJ
.
16.
Lam
,
A.
,
Sherwood
,
M.
, and
Shu
,
L.
,
2001
, “FMEA-Based Design for Remanufacture Using Automotive-Remanufacturer Data,” Technical Report, SAE Technical Paper.
17.
Kwak
,
M.
, and
Kim
,
H.
,
2017
, “
Green Profit Maximization Through Integrated Pricing and Production Planning for a Line of New and Remanufactured Products
,”
J. Clean. Prod.
,
142
, pp.
3454
3470
.
18.
Kim
,
J.
, and
Kim
,
H. M.
,
2020
, “
Impact of Generational Commonality of Short Life Cycle Products in Manufacturing and Remanufacturing Processes
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
142
(
12
), p.
122001
.
19.
Mishra
,
A. K.
,
Liu
,
X.
,
Hu
,
C.
, and
Wang
,
P.
,
2023
, “
Reliability-Informed End-of-Use Decision Making for Product Sustainability Using Two-Stage Stochastic Optimization
,”
Appl. Math. Model.
,
121
, pp.
364
385
.
20.
Maropoulos
,
P. G.
, and
Ceglarek
,
D.
,
2010
, “
Design Verification and Validation in Product Lifecycle
,”
CIRP Ann.
,
59
(
2
), pp.
740
759
.
21.
Harris
,
R.
,
Ijomah
,
W. L.
, and
Windmill
,
J.
,
2023
, “
Evaluation and Validation of Damage Assessment Tracking Criteria Models Within the Sector of UK Automotive Remanufacturing
,”
J. Clean. Prod.
,
414
, p.
137494
.
22.
Karkaria
,
V.
,
Chen
,
J.
,
Siuta
,
C.
,
Lim
,
D.
,
Radulescu
,
R.
, and
Chen
,
W.
,
2024
, “
A Machine Learning–Based Tire Life Prediction Framework for Increasing Life of Commercial Vehicle Tires
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
146
(
2
), p.
020902
.
23.
Irimescu
,
A.
,
Mihon
,
L.
, and
Pãdure
,
G.
,
2011
, “
Automotive Transmission Efficiency Measurement Using a Chassis Dynamometer
,”
Int. J. Automot. Technol.
,
12
(
4
), pp.
555
559
.
24.
Geller
,
B. M.
, and
Bradley
,
T. H.
,
2015
, “
Analyzing Drive Cycles for Hybrid Electric Vehicle Simulation and Optimization
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
137
(
4
), p.
041401
.
25.
Koller
,
T.
,
Tóth-Nagy
,
C.
, and
Perger
,
J.
,
2022
, “
Implementation of Vehicle Simulation Model in a Modern Dynamometer Test Environment
,”
Cognit. Sustainability
,
1
(
4
).
26.
REMADE Institute
,
2023
, “REMADE Impact Calculator,” https://remadeinstitute.org/project-impact-calculator .
You do not currently have access to this content.