Lumbar arthrodesis or spinal fusion is usually performed to relieve back pain, and regain functionality from degenerative disc disease, trauma, etc. Fusion is determined from radiographic images (X-ray) or computed tomography scans, yet these inspection procedures are subjective methods of review. As a result, exploratory surgery is performed if the presence of fusion cannot be confirmed. Therefore, a need exists to provide objective data to determine the presence of fusion that could avoid the cost, pain, and risk of exploratory surgery. One method to achieve this objective is to observe bending strain from spinal rods implanted during surgery. A system has been developed that will attach to the spinal instrumentation rods, transmit strain information wirelessly, and without the use of batteries. Major components of the system include a strain transferring sensor housing, a microelectromechanical (MEMS)-based strain sensor, telemetry circuitry, and antennae. Only discussed herein are the design, testing, and results of the housing without a cover and its ability to transfer strain from the rod to an internal surface where a foil strain gage is attached to characterize strain transfer efficiency. Strain gauges rather than the MEMS sensor were employed for housing characterization due cost and limited availability. Design constraints for the housing are long-term implantation, small size, greater than 95% transfer of bending strain from the spinal rods to the internal strain sensor, and ease of installation. ABAQUS finite element modeling software was employed to develop a working model that was fabricated using polyetheretherkeytone. The housing underwent cycle testing in a material testing system to simulate long-term implantation along with static testing to determine if creep was present. Both series of tests showed that the housing’s response did not degrade over a period of time and there was no indication of creep. The experimental results also validated the results of the ABAQUS finite element model.

2.
Rohlmann
,
A.
,
Graichen
,
F.
,
Weber
,
U.
, and
Bergmann
,
G.
, 2000, “
Monitoring In Vivo Implant Loads With a Telemeterized Internal Spinal Fixation Device
,”
Spine
0362-2436,
25
(
23
), pp.
2981
2986
.
3.
Kanayama
,
M.
,
Cunningham
,
B.
,
Weis
,
J.
,
Parker
,
L.
,
Kaneda
,
K.
, and
McAfee
,
P.
, 1997, “
Maturation of the Posterolateral Spinal Fusion and Its Effect on Load-Sharing of Spinal Instrumentation: An In Vivo Sheep Model
,”
J. Bone Jt. Surg., Am. Vol.
0021-9355,
79
(
11
), pp.
1710
1720
.
4.
Rohlman
,
A.
,
Bergmann
,
G.
, and
Graichen
,
F.
, 1994, “
A Spinal Fixation Device for In Vivo Load Measurement
,”
J. Biomech.
0021-9290,
27
(
7
), pp.
961
967
.
5.
Graichen
,
F.
,
Bergmann
,
G.
, and
Rohlmann
,
A.
, 1996, “
Patient Monitoring System for Load Measurement With Spinal Fixation Devices
,”
Med. Eng. Phys.
1350-4533,
18
(
2
), pp.
167
174
.
6.
Rohlmann
,
A.
,
Bauer
,
L.
,
Zander
,
T.
,
Bergmann
,
G.
, and
Wilke
,
H.
, 2006, “
Determination of Trunk Muscle Forces for Flexion and Extension by Using a Validated Finite Element Model of the Lumbar Spine and Measured In Vivo Data
,”
J. Biomech.
0021-9290,
39
(
6
), pp.
981
989
.
7.
Rohlmann
,
A.
,
Bergmann
,
G.
, and
Graichen
,
F.
, 1997, “
Loads On An Internal Spinal Fixation Device During Walking
,”
J. Biomech.
0021-9290,
30
(
1
), pp.
41
47
.
8.
Rohlmann
,
A.
,
Claes
,
L.
,
Bergmann
,
G.
,
Graichen
,
F.
,
Neef
,
P.
, and
Wilke
,
H.
, 2001, “
Comparison of Intradiscal Pressures and Spinal Fixator Loads for Different Body Positions and Exercises
,”
Ergonomics
0014-0139,
44
(
8
), pp.
781
794
.
9.
Rohlmann
,
A.
,
Bergmann
,
G.
,
Graichen
,
F.
, and
Weber
,
U.
, 1997, “
Comparison of Loads on Internal Spinal Fixation Devices Measured In Vitro and In Vivo
,”
Med. Eng. Phys.
1350-4533,
19
(
6
), pp.
539
546
.
10.
Rohlmann
,
A.
,
Bergmann
,
G.
, and
Graichen
,
F.
, 1999, “
Loads on Internal Spinal Fixators Measured in Different Body Positions
,”
Eur. Spine J.
0940-6719,
8
, pp.
354
359
.
11.
Ledet
,
E.
,
Sachs
,
B.
,
Brunski
,
J.
,
Gatto
,
C.
, and
Donzelli
,
P.
, 2000,
Real Time In Vivo Loading in the Lumbar Spine. Part 1: Interbody Implant Load Cell Design and Preliminary Data
,
Spine
0362-2436,
25
(
20
), pp.
2595
2600
.
12.
Szivek
,
J.
,
Roberto
,
R.
,
Slack
,
J.
, and
Majeed
,
B.
, 2002, “
An Implantable Strain Measurement System Designed to Detect Spine Fusion: Preliminary Results From a Biomechanical In Vivo Study
,”
Spine
0362-2436,
27
(
5
), pp.
487
497
.
13.
Wilke
,
H.
,
Rohlmann
,
A.
,
Neller
,
S.
,
Schulthei
,
M.
,
Bergmann
,
G.
,
Graichen
,
F.
, and
Claes
,
L.
, 2001, “
Is It Possible to Simulate Physiologic Loading Conditions by Applying Pure Moments?: A Comparison of In Vivo and In Vitro Load Components in an Internal Fixator
,”
Spine
0362-2436,
26
(
6
), pp.
636
642
.
15.
Avallone
,
E.
, and
Baumeister
,
T.
, 1996,
Marks’ Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers
, 10th ed.,
McGraw–Hill
, New York, pp.
3
24
.
You do not currently have access to this content.