There is a very large need for prosthetic components in developing countries, where such devices are imported and prohibitively expensive. This work explores the possibility of developing and manufacturing prosthetic components locally in Venezuela while preserving high quality and function. We aimed at developing a kit of plastic modular adaptors for external transtibial prostheses. The project covers design, stress analyses, and function assessment of the components. Design criteria were established from the state-of-the-art of prosthetic adaptors in commercial models and international patents. The resulting kit comprises four adaptors of simple design. Their response was studied with stress analysis, using the finite element method, applying static loads for different instants of gait during the stance phase. The simulation of the adaptors shows that the stresses presented for a person weighing up to 980 N (100 kg) do not reach the yield strength of nylon 6.6. Then, five kits of adaptors were manufactured with this thermoplastic material using conventional metal-working machines. The resulting components are lighter and cheaper than equivalent imported metallic ones. The kits were adapted to four patients and assessed via gait analysis and questionnaire. A very good function is observed, with neither significant difference in most of spatiotemporal gait parameters compared to normal values (p<0.05) nor significant asymmetries between prosthetic and sound sides. From the questionnaire, stiffness, maneuverability, and comfort ability of the manufactured kits was found high by all the patients. A 3 months adaptation period was also completed by the patients prior to performing the gait analyses. This period is considered a first field trial of the adaptors; however, these results will be complemented in the future, as the kits were not tested to structural fatigue.

1.
ISPO
, 2000, “
Report of ISPO Consensus Conference on Appropriate Orthopaedic Technology for Low-Income Countries
,” Moshi, Tanzania, Sept. 18–22.
2.
Word Health Organization
, 2005, “
Guidelines for Training Personnel in Developing Countries for Prosthetics and Orthotics Services
,” see also URL http://www.who.int/disabilities/publications/technology/en/http://www.who.int/disabilities/publications/technology/en/
3.
International Committee of the Red Cross
, 2007, “
Polypropylene Technology
,” see also URL http://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/p0913http://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/p0913
4.
Nummelin
,
L.
, and
Lfstedt
,
T.
, 1995, “
Finnish Red Cross Multiprosthesis System
,”
Proceedings of the ISPO Consensus Conference on Appropriate Orthopaedic Technology for Low-Income Countries
, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, pp.
160
163
.
5.
Pearlman
,
J.
,
Cooper
,
R. A.
,
Krizack
,
M.
,
Lindsley
,
A.
,
Wu
,
Y.
,
Reisinger
,
K. D.
,
Armstrong
,
W.
,
Casanova
,
H.
,
Chhabra
,
H. S.
, and
Noon
,
J.
, 2008, “
Lower-Limb Prostheses and Wheelchairs in Low-Income Countries: An Overview
,”
IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag.
0739-5175,
27
(
2
), pp.
12
22
.
6.
Jensen
,
J. S.
,
Craig
,
J. G.
,
Mtalo
,
L. B.
, and
Zelaya
,
C. M.
, 2004, “
Clinical Field Follow-Up of High Density Polyethylene (HDPE)-Jaipur Prosthetic Technology for Transfemoral-Amputees
,”
Prosthet. Orthot. Int.
0309-3646,
28
(
2
), pp.
152
166
.
7.
Boone
,
D. A.
, 1995, “
Prosthetic Outreach Foundation Programme Evaluation of Automated Fabrication of Limb Prostheses in Vietnam
,”
Proceedings of the ISPO Consensus Conference on Appropriate Orthopaedic Technology for Low-Income Countries
, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, pp.
95
105
.
8.
TiMed
, 2009, “
TiMed Prosthetic Components
,” on the WWW, URL http://www.ti-med.com/alum.htmlhttp://www.ti-med.com/alum.html
9.
Fillauer
, 2008, “
Fillauer Advertising Literature
,” on the WWW, http://www.fillauer.com/advertising/index.htmlhttp://www.fillauer.com/advertising/index.html
10.
Össur
, 2008, “
Ossur Standard Adapters Rated to 100 kg/220 lbs
,” on the WWW, URL http://www.ossur.com/?pageid=3564#Socket%20Adaptershttp://www.ossur.com/?pageid=3564#Socket%20Adapters
11.
Arbogast
,
R. E.
,
Bartkus
,
E. K.
,
Colvin
,
J.
, and
Arbogast
,
J.
, 1995, “
Adjustable Lower Limb Prosthesis Having Conical Support
,” U.S. Patent No. 5,405,410.
12.
Voisin
,
J. P.
, 2001, “
Prosthetic Adaptor and Prosthetic Limb Using Same
,” U.S. Patent No. 6,312,475.
13.
Steinbarger
,
S.
, and
Johncour
,
D.
, 2006, “
Prosthetic Annular Coupling Socket Adaptor With Adjustable Clamp
,” U.S. Patent No. 6,994,732.
14.
Nordin
,
M.
, and
Frankel
,
V. H.
, 2001,
Basic Biomechanics of the Musculoskeletal System
,
Lippincott
,
Philadelphia
.
15.
Kadaba
,
M. P.
,
Ramakrishnan
,
H. K.
, and
Wooten
,
M. E.
, 1990, “
Measurement of Lower Extremity Kinematics During Level Walking
,”
J. Orthop. Res.
0736-0266,
8
, pp.
383
392
.
16.
Viosca
,
E.
,
Soler-Gracia
,
C.
,
Prat
,
J.
, and
Cortés
,
A.
, 2005, “
Gait Analysis in Lower-Limb Prostheses
,”
Biomechanics of Normal and Pathological Human Gait
,
J.
Prat
, ed.,
Instituto de Biomecánica de Valencia
,
Valencia
, pp.
262
310
.
17.
Bateni
,
H.
, and
Olney
,
S. J.
, 2002, “
Kinematic and Kinetic Variations of Below-Knee Amputee Gait
,”
J. Prosthet. Orthot.
,
14
(
1
), pp.
2
12
.
18.
Perry
,
J.
, 1992,
Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function
,
SLACK Incorporated
,
Thorofare
.
19.
Winter
,
D. A.
, and
Sienko
,
S. E.
, 1988, “
Biomechanics of Below-Knee Amputee Gait
,”
J. Biomech.
0021-9290,
21
, pp.
361
367
.
You do not currently have access to this content.