This is the first of four companion papers that present a comprehensive assessment of the effect of sea floor subsidence on the Valhall complex of platforms. The study has included an estimate of the increase in platform failure probability as a function of increased subsidence. Subsidence raises the effective mean still water level and increases the potential for inundation of the deck for extreme storm conditions. Deck wave slam forces generate significantly greater platform loading and lead to: (a) higher levels of structural inelastic response and increased risk of structural failure as well as (b) water reaching the cellar deck, and hence affecting operators as well as equipment. The paper focuses on addressing the first of these two issues. A structural assessment study was performed to address the significance of present and future levels of subsidence on the safety of three North Sea platforms. The study included a systematic assessment procedure that addressed each of the factors that impacted structural integrity issues and reliability concerns. Such factors included: ultimate strength analysis methodologies, tubular joint formulations, group pile effects, and soil-structure interaction, which are described in this paper, as well as deck impact force formulations (Pawsey et al., 1998, “Characterization of Environmental Loads on Subsiding Offshore Platforms,” 17th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, July) component and system reliability modeling (Jha et al., 2000, “Assessment of Offshore Platforms Under Subsidence—Part II: Analysis and Results,” ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 122, pp. 267–273), and acceptance criteria (Stahl et al., 1998, “Acceptance Criteria for Offshore Platforms,” 17th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, July). This paper presents the assessment procedure, as well as the modeling approach. The paper also discusses the consequence classification of the three platforms and state-of-the-art soil mechanics techniques that lead to a significant increase in the tensile capacity of the foundation. [S0892-7219(00)00204-1]

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
structural engineering, mechanical engineering, oceanic crust, soil, mechanical strength, failure analysis
Topics:
Failure, Modeling, Offshore platforms, Risk, Soil, Waves, Stress, Safety, Probability, Reliability, Storms
1.
API Recommended Practice 2A-WSD (RP 2A-WSD), 1997, Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms—Working Stress Design, 20th Edition, Supplement 1, February 1.
2.
Kallaby J., Lee, G., Crawford, C., Light, L., Dolan, D., and Chen, J.H., “Structural Assessment of Existing Platforms” OTC 7483, Offshore Technology Conference Proceedings, May 1994.
3.
Craig, M. J. K., and Digree, K.A., 1994, “Assessment of High Consequence Platforms: Issues and Applications,” OTC 7485. Offshore Technology Conference Proceedings, May.
4.
Broughton, P., and Horn, E., 1987, “Ekofisk Platform 2/4C: Re-analysis due to Subsidence,” Proc, Instn Civ Engrs, Part 1, Vol. 82 Oct.
5.
API RP 2A-WSD, 1997, 20th Edition Supplement 1, Dec., effective date: February 1.
6.
Draft ISO Standard for Fixed Offshore Structures Section C—Design, Section 0 “In-Service Inspection and Structural Integrity Management” and Section R “Assessment of Existing Structures” and Section X “Modeling for Structural Analyses.”
7.
Norwegian Petroleum Directorate, 1996, “Acts Regulations and Provisions for the Petroleum Activities—Volume 2,” Stavanger, Norway, March.
8.
PMB Engineering, Inc., 1996 “Hurricane Andrew—Effects on Offshore Platforms,” Phase 2 Final Report to Joint Industry Project, San Francisco, California, Jan.
9.
BOMEL, 1997, “Development of Best Practice Guidelines for Ultimate Strength Analysis Joint Industry Project, Ultiguide—Phase 1,” Final Report, Doc. No. C675/04/048R, Jan.
10.
MSL Engineering, 1996, “Assessment Criteria, Reliability and Reserve Strength of Tubular Joints, Part 1: Recommendations and Commentary,” Doc. Ref. C14200R011, Rev 3, Mar.
11.
Pawsey, S., Driver, D., Gebara, J., Bole J., and Westlake, H., 1998, “Characterization of Environmental Loads on Subsiding Offshore Platforms,” 17th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, July.
12.
Stahl, B., Aune, S., Gebara, J., and Cornell, C. A., 1998, “Acceptance Criteria for Offshore Platforms,” 17th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, July.
13.
Jha
,
A. K.
,
Kiciman
,
O. K.
,
Gebara
,
J.
,
Stahl
,
B.
, and
Dahl-Stamnes
,
K.
,
2000
, “
Assessment of Offshore Platforms under Subsidence—Part II: Analysis and Results
,”
ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
,
122
, Nov., pp.
267
–
273
.
14.
Bea, R. G., Litton, R. W., Nour-Omid, S., and Chang, J. Y., 1984, PMB Systems Engineering, Inc., “A Specialized Design and Research Tool for the Modeling of Near-Field Pile-Soil Interactions,” 16th Offshore Technology Conference, May.
15.
Jardine, R. J., and Chow, F. C., “New Design Methods for Offshore Piles,” MTD Publication 96/103.
16.
Fugro Limited, 1997, “Foundation Re-evaluation Report. Valhall Field. Block 2/8, Norwegian Sector, North Sea,” Report 65144-1 to Amoco Norway Oil Company, Mar.
17.
Kaplan, P., and Warier, S., 1997, “Analysis and Prediction of Wave Impact Forces on Valhall Field Offshore Platform Decks, Including Deck Equipment,” Report No. 97-104, prepared for Amoco Corporation.
Copyright © 2000
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.