Role of mini tension leg platforms (TLP) in oil exploration and production in marginal deepwater fields is becoming increasingly important. Mini TLP combines the simplicity of a spar and favorable response features of a TLP. In this paper, the results of a detailed experimental and numerical investigation of the coupled dynamic behavior of a mini TLP are reported with special attention to hull-tether coupling. The experimental study has been carried out using a scaled model in wave flume with specially designed tethers whose first two “string” natural frequencies are excited by waves, thus achieving strong hull-tether coupling. The numerical study has been carried out using a nonlinear time domain finite element method specifically addressed to compliant offshore platforms using a combination of potential theory based wave loading and Morison-type wave loading. Extensive comparisons between numerical and experimental results have been made both for platform motions and deflected shapes of the tethers and conclusions drawn.

1.
Hudson, W. L., and Vasseur, J. C., 1996, “Small Tension Leg Platform for Marginal Deepwater Fields,” Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 8046, pp. 149–158.
2.
Logan, B. L., and Naylor, S., 1996, “Atlantic Alliance: The Next Generation Tension Leg Platform,” Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 8264, pp. 933–947.
3.
Muren, J., Flugstad, P., Greiner, B., D’Souza, R., and Solberg, I. C., 1996, “The 3 Column TLP—A Cost Efficient Deepwater Production and Drilling Platform,” Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 8045, pp. 137–147.
4.
Teigen, P., and Niedzwecki, J. M., 1998, “Experimental and Numerical Assessment of Mini TLP for Benign Environment,” International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers Conference (ISOPE ’98), pp. 162–167.
5.
Kibbee
,
S.
,
1996
, “
SeaStar Minimal Platform for Small Deepwater Reserves
,”
Offshore
,
56
(
6
), pp.
46
73
.
6.
Anonymous, 1999, “
Mono-Hull TLP Makes Smaller Deepwater Projects Practical,” World Oil, July issue, pp. 34–36.
7.
Cottrill, A., 1998, “Monocolumn TLP Helps Morpeth Fly,” Offshore Eng., July issue, pp. 20–23.
8.
Kibbee, S., Leverette, S. J., Davies, K. B., and Matten, R. B., 1999, “Morpeth SeaStar Mini-TLP,” Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 10855.
9.
Capanoglu, C. C., 1997, “Comparative Assessment of New Generation Deep Water Marginal Field Structures,” Japan National Oil Corp. (JNOC) Workshop on Challenging offshore field development, Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Conference (OMAE ’97), pp. 207–215.
10.
Leonard
,
J. W.
, and
Young
,
R. A.
,
1985
, “
Coupled Response of Compliant Offshore Platforms
,”
Eng. Struct.
,
7
, pp.
73
84
.
11.
Jain
,
A. K.
,
1997
, “
Nonlinear Coupled Response of Offshore Tension Leg Platforms to Regular Wave Forces
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
24
, pp.
577
592
.
12.
Ran, Z., Kim, M. H., and Zheng, W., 1998, “Coupled Dynamic Analysis of a Moored Spar in Random Waves and Currents (Time Domain vs Freq Domain Analysis),” Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Conference (OMAE ’98), 0604.
13.
Chatterjee
,
P. C.
,
Das
,
P. K.
, and
Faulkner
,
D.
,
1997
, “
Hydro-Structural Analysis Program for TLPs
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
24, 4
, pp.
313
334
.
14.
Kim, C. H., Kim, M. H., Liu, Y. H., and Zhao, C. T., 1994, “Time Domain Simulation of Nonlinear Response of d Coupled TLP System in Random Seas,” International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers Conference (ISOPE ’94), pp. 68–77.
15.
Natvig, B. J., and Johnsen, O., 2000, “Coupled Dynamics of Tether and Platform for a North Sea Wellhead TLP,” International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers Conference (ISOPE 2000), pp. 295–301.
16.
Bhattacharyya
,
S. K.
,
Sreekumar
,
S.
, and
Idichandy
,
V. G.
,
2003
, “
Coupled Dynamics of Seastar Mini Tension Leg Platform
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
30, 6
, pp.
709
737
.
17.
Chakrabarti, S. K., and Grinius, V., 1998, “Role of Physical Simulation of Deepwater Floating Offshore Structures,” OMAE98-0345.
18.
Sreekumar, S., Bhattacharyya, S. K., and Idichandy, V. G., 2001, “Coupled Dynamics of SeaStar Mini Tension Leg Platform Using Linear Diffraction-Radiation Theory,” Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Conference (OMAE ’01) 1074.
19.
Chakrabarti, S. K., 1987, Hydrodynamics of Offshore Structures, Computational Mechanics Limited and Springer-Verlag, New York.
20.
Berteaux, H. O., 1991, Coastal and Oceanic Buoy Engineering, Berteaux.
21.
Sathyapal, S., 2001, “Finite Element Procedures for Second Order Steady and Low Frequency Wave Forces on Elongated Bodies With Forward Speed,” Ph.D. thesis, IIT Madras.
22.
Sreekumar, S., 2001, “Analytical and Experimental Investigations on the Dynamics of Deepwater Mini Tension Leg Platforms,” Ph.D. thesis, IIT Madras.
23.
Bhattacharyya
,
S. K.
,
Sathyapal
,
S.
, and
Vendhan
,
C. P.
,
2001
, “
Absorbing Boundary Conditions on Elliptic Boundary for Finite Element Analysis of Water Wave Diffraction by Large Elongated Bodies
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
,
37
, pp.
249
277
.
24.
Kim, M. H., Ran, Z., and Zheng, W., 2001, “Hull/Mooring Coupled Dynamic Analysis of a Truss Spar in Time Domain,” ISOPE, pp. 42–54.
25.
Chakrabarti, S. K., 1994, Physical Modeling of Offshore Structures, World Scientific, Singapore.
26.
Niedzwecki, J. M., Liagre, P. F., Roesset, J. M., and Kim, M. H., 2001, “An Experimental Research Study of a Mini-TLP,” Proceedings of the Eleventh International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, pp. 631–634.
27.
Ward, E. G., Haring, R. E., and Devlin, P. V., 1999, “Deep Water Mooring and Riser Analysis for Depths to 10 000 Feet,” OTC 10808.
You do not currently have access to this content.