Recent rapid advances in developing mesh-insensitive structural stress methods are summarized in this paper. The new structural stress methods have been demonstrated to be effective in reliably calculating structural stresses that can be correlated with fatigue behavior from simple weld details to complex structures. As a result, a master S–N curve approach has been developed and validated by a large amount of weld S–N data in the literature. The applications of the present structural stress methods in a number of joint types in offshore/marine structures will be illustrated in this paper. The implications on future applications in drastically simplifying fatigue design and evaluation for offshore/marine structures will also be discussed, particularly for using very coarse finite element mesh designs in ship structures.

1.
Fricke W., 2001, “Recommended Hot-Spot Analysis Procedure for Structural Details of FPSO’s and Ships Based on Round-Robin FE Analysis,” ISOPE Proceedings, Stavanger, Norway, June.
2.
Dong, P., Hong, J. K., Cao, Z., 2000, “A Mesh-Insensitive Structural Stress Procedure for Fatigue Evaluation of Welded Structures,” International Institute of Welding, IIW Doc. XIII-1902-01/XV-1089-01, July.
3.
Dong
,
P.
,
2001
, “
A Structural Stress Definition and Numerical Implementation for Fatigue Evaluation of Welded Joints
,”
Int. J. Fatigue
,
23/10
, pp.
865
876
.
4.
Dong, P. and Hong, J. K., 2002, “A Structural Stress Based Master S-N Curve Approach for Welded Joints,” 55th International Institute of Welding (IIW) Annual Assembly, Document No. IIW Doc. XIII-1930-02/XV-1119-02, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 23–27.
5.
Dong, P., Hong, J. K, Osage, D., and Prager, M., “Assessment of ASME’s FSRF Rules for Pipe and Vessel Welds Using A New Structural Stress Method,” Welding In the World, Vol. 47, No. 1/2, 2003, pp. 31–43.
6.
Dong, P., Hong, J. K., Osage, D., Prager, M., 2002, “Master S-N Curve Method for Fatigue Evaluation of Welded Components,” WRC Bulletin, No. 474, August.
7.
Healy, B, “A Case Study Comparison of Surface Extrapolation and Baltelle Structural Stress Methodologies,” Paper No. OMAE 2004-51228, Proceedings of the 23rd OMAE International Conference, Vancouver, Canada, June 2004.
8.
Dong
,
P.
,
Hong
,
J. K.
, and
Cao
,
Z.
,
2003
, “
Stress and Stress Intensities at Notches: ‘Anomalous Short Crack Growth’ Revisited
,”
Int. J. Fatigue
25
, pp.
811
825
.
9.
Zerbst
,
U.
,
Heerens
,
J.
, and
Schwalbe
,
K.-H.
,
2002
, “
The fracture behavior of a welded tubular joint—an ESIS TC1.3 round-robin on failure assessment methods Part I: experimental data base and brief summary of the results
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
,
69
, pp.
1093
1100
.
10.
Dong, P. and Hong, J. K., 2002, “Analysis of Hot Spot Stress and Alternative Structural Stress Methods,” Paper No. OMAE 2003-37315, Proceedings of the 22nd OMAE International Conference, June 8–13, Cancun, Mexico.
11.
Connolly
,
M. P.
,
Helier
,
A. K.
, and
Sutomo
,
J.
,
1990
, “
A parametric study of the ratio of bending to membrane stress in tubular Y- and T-joints
,”
Int. J. Fatigue
,
12
, No.
1
, pp.
3
11
.
12.
Kim, W. S., Kim, D. H., Lee, S. G., and Lee, Y. K., “Fatigue strength of load-carrying box fillet weldment in ship structures,” Proc. of 8th International Symposium on Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures (PRADS 2001), Shanghai, China.
13.
Hobbacher, A., “Fatigue Design of Welded Joints and Components,” Recommendations of IIW Joint Working Group XIII-XV, Abington Publishing, Abington, Cambridge, 1996.
You do not currently have access to this content.