Abstract

This paper proposes several schemes for optimal scheduling of power producers in a shipboard power system for a typical offshore supply vessel, having a multiple number of possibly varying capacity gensets. The proposed scheduling methods are illustrated using four alternative power system configurations, ranging from a few large gensets to many gensets of smaller ratings. Mixed integer linear programming is used to formulate the optimization problems. Three formulations are presented: one for minimizing online capacity without further objectives, one that includes a redundancy constraint for loosing a group of gensets (to account for a worst-case failure scenario), and one to also balance running hours and minimizing connect/disconnect of the gensets. These different objectives can be combined and weighted based on importance, with or without redundancy constraints. Simulations are carried out to demonstrate the properties of the three different scheduling methods. The first method, minimizing online capacity only, is also used to illustrate the differences between the four genset configurations. This shows, for instance, that using more small gensets ensures generally a lower online available power (the connected capacity matches better the prevailing load) and near optimal loading of each genset around 80% (assuming equal loadsharing), at the same time as resilience to genset failures is preserved.

References

1.
International Maritime Organization (IMO)
,
1994
, “
MSC/Circular.645—Guidelines for Vessels With Dynamic Positioning Systems
.”
2.
Ådnanes
,
A. K.
,
2003
,
Maritime Electrical Installations and Diesel Electric Propulsion
,
ABB AS
,
Norway
.
3.
IMO
,
2005
, “
Amendments to the Annex of the Protocol of 1997 to Amend the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution From Ships (Regulations on Air Pollution for Ships in MARPOL Annex VI)
.”
4.
Thorat
,
L.
, and
Skjetne
,
R.
,
2017
, “
Load-Dependent Start–Stop of Gensets Modeled as a Hybrid Dynamical System
,”
IFAC-PapersOnLine
,
50
(
1
), pp.
9321
9328
.
5.
Liu
,
Y.
,
Qu
,
Z.
,
Xin
,
H.
, and
Gan
,
D.
,
2017
, “
Distributed Real-Time Optimal Power Flow Control in Smart Grid
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
,
32
(
5
), pp.
3403
3414
.
6.
Wu
,
W.
,
Wang
,
D.
,
Arapostathis
,
A.
, and
Davey
,
K
,
2007
, “
Optimal Power Generation Scheduling of Shipboard Power System
,”
IEEE Electric Ship Technologies Symposium
,
Arlington, VA
,
May 21–23
, pp.
519
522
.
7.
Skjong
,
E.
,
Volden
,
R.
,
Rødskar
,
E.
,
Molinas
,
M.
,
Johansen
,
T. A.
, and
Cunningham
,
J.
,
2016
, “
Past Present and Future Challenges of the Marine Vessel’s Electrical Power System
,”
IEEE Trans. Trans. Electr.
,
1
(
4
), pp.
522
537
.
8.
Satpathi
,
K.
,
Balijepalli
,
V.
, and
Ukil
,
A.
,
2017
, “
Modeling and Real-Time Scheduling of DC Platform Supply Vessel for Fuel Efficient Operation
,”
IEEE Trans. Trans. Electr.
,
3
(
3
), pp.
762
778
.
9.
Garver
,
L. L.
,
1963
, “
Power Generation Scheduling by Integer Programming Development of Theory
,”
AIEE Trans.
,
81
(
2
), pp.
730
735
.
10.
Skjong
,
E.
,
Johansen
,
T. A.
,
Molinas
,
M.
, and
Sørensen
,
A. J.
,
2017
, “
Approaches to Economic Energy Management in Diesel-Electric Marine Vessels
,”
IEEE Trans. Trans. Electr.
,
3
(
1
), pp.
22
35
.
11.
DNV-GL
,
2011
, “
Rules for Classification of Ships/High Speed, Light Craft and Naval Surface Craft, Part 4, ch. 2, Section 4
.”
12.
,
T. I.
,
2012
, “
Dynamic Model Predictive Control for Load Sharing in Electric Power Plants for Ships
,” MS thesis,
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
,
Trondheim
.
13.
Krause
,
P. C.
,
Wasynczuk
,
O.
, and
Sudhoff
,
S. D.
,
1994
,
Analysis of Electric Machinery and Drive Systems
, 2nd ed.,
IEEE Press Power Engineering Series
,
John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
,
Piscataway, NJ
.
14.
Osen
,
O.
,
2016
, “
Optimizing Electric Energy Production On-Board Offshore Vessels: Vessel Power Consumption Profile and Production Strategies Using Genetic Algorithms
,”
OCEANS 2016—Shanghai
,
China
,
Apr. 10–13
, pp.
1
10
.
You do not currently have access to this content.