Abstract

A new type of umbilical cable named “high-current composite umbilical cable” is composed of electronic cables, optical cables, steel tubes, and structural strengthening components. It can be regarded as a key piece of industrial equipment in subsea production systems that provide control functions, high electric current, and hydraulic remote transmission. When it is oriented at a power supply with a relatively high rated current, power transmission will produce a lot of heat. Then, the cross-sectional temperature increases, which affects the performances of its material and mechanical responses. Therefore, electro–thermal–mechanical coupled analysis is critical for the cross-sectional design of the high-current composite umbilical cable. Accordingly, a multi-physics coupled analysis was performed based on two typical umbilical cable cross sections. Finite element models were established and subjected to electro–thermal analysis to obtain a temperature distribution of the two sections at different current capacities. Based on results of temperature field analysis, the section models were subjected to thermo–mechanical analysis. The results of the two types of analyses are compared and differences are discussed, which illustrate the multi-physics coupled effect cannot be neglected. The armored layers will relatively reduce the heat dissipation performance, but compared with the umbilical cable model without the armored layers, the model with double-armored layers is less affected by temperature, so its capacity of resistance external pressure is relatively better. The proposed coupled analysis methodology provides a new guidance for the design of the high-current composite umbilical cables.

References

1.
Bai
,
Y.
, and
Bai
,
Q.
,
2005
,
Subsea Pipelines and Risers
,
Elsevier
,
Amsterdam
.
2.
Guo
,
H.
,
Qu
,
Y.
,
Li
,
B.
, and
Wang
,
J.
,
2012
, “
Research Situation on Domestic and Abroad Umbilical Cord Technology and Prospect of Application in China
,”
China Offshore Oil Gas
,
24
(
1
), pp.
74
78
.
3.
API R P
,
2008
,
1E Specification for Subsea Production Control Umbilical
,
American Petroleum Institute
,
Washington, D. C
.
4.
Tang
,
M. G.
,
Yan
,
J.
,
Wang
,
Y.
, and
Yue
,
Q. J.
,
2014
, “
Tensile Stiffness Analysis on Ocean Dynamic Power Umbilical
,”
China Ocean Eng.
,
28
(
2
), pp.
259
270
.
5.
Knapp
,
R. H.
,
1979
, “
Derivation of a New Stiffness Matrix for Helically Armoured Cables Considering Tension and Torsion
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
,
14
(
4
), pp.
515
529
.
6.
Knapp
,
R. H.
,
1981
, “
Torque and Stress Balanced Design of Helically Armoured Cables
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
103
(
1
), pp.
61
66
.
7.
Slotboom
,
O. F.
,
1995
, “
Simplified Estimation of Helically Steel Armored Cable Elongation, Diameter Reduction and Rotation
,”
Challenges of Our Changing Global Environment
,
San Diego, CA
,
Oct. 9–12
, pp.
126
137
.
8.
Costello
,
G. A.
,
1997
,
Theory of Wire Rope
,
Springer
,
New York
.
9.
Yue
,
Q. J.
,
Lu
,
Q. Z.
,
Yan
,
J.
,
Zheng
,
J. X.
, and
Palmer
,
A.
,
2013
, “
Tension Behavior Prediction of Flexible Pipelines in Shallow Water
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
58
(
2
), pp.
201
207
.
10.
IEC 60287-1-1
,
1994
,
Calculation of the Current Rating of Electric Cables—Part 1: Current Rating Equations (100% Load Factor) and Calculation of Losses Section 1: General
,
IEC Publication
,
Geneva
.
11.
IEC 60287-1-2
,
1993
,
Calculation of the Current Rating of Electric Cables—Part 1: Current Rating Equations (100% Load Factor) and Calculation of Losses Section 2: Sheath Eddy Current Loss Factor for two Circuits in Flat Formation
,
IEC Publication
,
Geneva
.
12.
IEC 60287-2-1
,
1994
,
Calculation of the Current Rating of Electric Cables—Part 2: Thermal Resistance Section 1: Calculation of Thermal Resistance
,
IEC Publication
,
Geneva
.
13.
Gela
,
G.
, and
Dai
,
J. J.
,
1988
, “
Calculation of Thermal Fields of Underground Cable Using the Boundary Element Method
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Delivery
,
3
(
4
), pp.
1341
1347
.
14.
Hanna
,
M. A.
,
Chikhani
,
A. Y.
, and
Salama
,
M. A. A.
,
1993
, “
Thermal Analysis of Power Cables in Multi-Layered Soil
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Delivery
,
8
(
3
), pp.
761
771
.
15.
Chen
,
C.
,
Niu
,
H. Q.
,
You
,
Y.
,
Zhang
,
Y.
,
Zhao
,
J. G.
, and
Zhang
,
Q. F.
,
2012
, “
Experimental Revision of the Multi-Circuit Ampacity Correction Factor of Direct Buried 10kV Three-Core Cables
,”
Proceedings of the 2012 Third International Conference on Mechanic Automation and Control Engineering
,
Baotou, China
,
July 27–30
.
16.
Hu
,
Q. N.
,
Liu
,
G.
,
Ye
,
X. J.
, and
Yan
,
L. F.
,
2013
, “
Three Core Cable Hot Field Distribution and Coaxial Heat Road Model Feasibility Study
,”
Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PES)
,
Vancouver, Canada
,
July 21–25
.
17.
Henriksen
,
T.
,
Lervik
,
K. J.
, and
Normann
,
T.
,
2007
, “
Thermal and Electromagnetic Modelling of Power Umbilicals
,”
8th International Conference on Insulated Power Cables
,
Prysmian
,
June 24–28
.
18.
Sævik
,
S.
,
2010
, “
Comparison Between Theoretical and Experiment Flexible Pipe Bending Stresses
,”
ASME 2010 29th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
,
Shanghai, China
,
June 6–11
, pp.
395
402
.
19.
Neto
,
A. G.
, and
Wriggers
,
P.
,
2020
, “
Master-Master Frictional Contact and Applications for Beam-Shell Interaction
,”
Comput. Mech.
,
66
(
6
), pp.
1213
1235
.
20.
Shackleton
,
D.
,
Abib
,
L.
, and
Balena
,
R.
,
2007
, “
Electrical and thermal design of umbilical cable
,”
8th International Conference on Insulated Power Cables
,
Prysmian
,
June 24–28
, Vol.
5
, pp.
50
57
.
21.
Guo
,
H.
, and
Gao
,
H.
,
2013
, “
The Finite Element Method of Temperature Field and Ampacity Analysis of Umbilical Cable
,”
Electric Wire Cable
,
3
, pp.
04
05
.
22.
Krieger
,
G. C.
, and
Yanagihara
,
J. I.
,
2012
, “
Prediction of the Temperature Distribution of Partially Submersed Umbilical Cables
,”
J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng.
,
34
(
2
), pp.
205
212
.
23.
Lu
,
Q. Z.
,
Yang
,
Z. X.
,
Yan
,
J.
, and
Yue
,
Q. J.
,
2014
, “
Design of Cross-Sectional Layout of Steel Tube Umbilical
,”
ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
,
136
(
4
), p.
041401
.
24.
Yang
,
Z. X.
,
Lu
,
Q. Z.
,
Yan
,
J.
,
Chen
,
J. L.
, and
Yue
,
Q. J.
,
2018
, “
Multidisciplinary Optimization Design for the Section Layout of Umbilicals Based on Intelligent Algorithm
,”
ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
,
140
(
3
), p.
031702
.
25.
Yan
,
J.
,
Hu
,
H. T.
,
Su
,
Q.
,
Lu
,
Q. Z.
,
Yang
,
Z. X.
, and
Yue
,
Q. J.
,
2019
, “
Coupled Thermo-Elastic Analysis on Cross-Section of Umbilical Cables
,”
ASME 2019 38th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
,
Glasgow, UK
,
June 9–14
.
26.
ANSYS® Academic Research Mechanical
,
Release 18.0, Help System, Coupled Field Analysis Guide, ANSYS, Inc
.
27.
Bejan
,
A.
,
2013
,
Convection Heat Transfer
,
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
,
Hoboken, NJ
.
28.
Li
,
L. Z.
,
Zhong
,
L. S.
,
Zhang
,
K.
,
Gao
,
J. H.
, and
Xu
,
M.
,
2018
, “
Temperature Dependence of Mechanical, Electrical Properties and Crystal Structure of Polyethylene Blends for Cable Insulation
,”
Materials
,
11
(
10
), p.
1922
.
29.
Amjadi
,
M.
, and
Fatemi
,
A.
,
2020
, “
Tensile Behavior of High-Density Polyethylene Including the Effects of Processing Technique, Thickness, Temperature, and Strain Rate
,”
Polymers
,
12
(
9
), p.
1857
.
You do not currently have access to this content.